Discontinuation of biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: analysis from multicenter cohort study.

Despite of the availability of several effective bDMARDs, a significant proportion of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients discontinued bDMARDs. The aims of this study were to analyze causes of bDMARDs discontinuation in RA and AS included in the Moroccan registry RBSMR. A historical prospective multicenter cohort study based on the RBSMR database at 12 months of follow-up, which included 225 RA and 170 AS. Using T student, Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared or Fischer exact tests, baseline demographic and clinical features were compared between patients discontinuing bDMARDs and patients remaining on initiated bDMARDs or switching bDMARDs. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with drugs discontinuation. 61 RA discontinued bDMARDs and 47 AS interrupted anti-TNF. The most common reasons for drugs discontinuation were adverse events (7.5%) in RA patients and social security reimbursement problems (16.8%) in AS. RA patients discontinuing bDMARDs were more frequently first-line biological drugs users, more frequently female and had more comorbidities and lower DAS28 CRP than RA patients remaining on initiated bDMARDs or switching bDMARDs (p < 0.001, p = 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). Female sex and comorbidities were the significant predictors of bDMARDs discontinuation in RA patients. Higher baseline BASDAI had a protective role on anti-TNF interruption in AS patients. Adverse events and social security reimbursement problems were the main reasons for drugs discontinuation in RA and AS patients respectively. Female sex and comorbidities in RA patients, baseline BASDAI in AS patients impacted bDMARDs discontinuation in real-life settings.

Systematic vertebral fracture assessment in asymptomatic postmenopausal women.

INTRODUCTION: Recognition of vertebral fractures (VFs) changes the patient's diagnostic classification, estimation of fracture risk, and threshold for pharmacological intervention. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) enables the detection of VFs in the same session as bone mineral density (BMD) testing. OBJECTIVE: To study prevalence and risk factors of VFs using VFA in asymptomatic women and measure its effect on treatment recommendations. METHODS: We enrolled 908 postmenopausal women (mean age, weight and BMI of 60.9 ± 7.7 (50-91) years, 73.2 ± 13.2 (35-150) kg and 29.8 ± 5.3 (14.5-50.8) kg/m(2), respectively. Lateral VFA images and scans of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were obtained using a GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy densitometer. VFs were defined using a combination of Genant semiquantitative (SQ) approach and morphometry. RESULTS: VFs were identified in 382 patients (42.0%): 203 (22.3%) had grade 1 and 179 (19.7%) had grade 2 or 3. The prevalence of VFA-detected fractures globally increased significantly with age and as BMI and BMD declined. A fracture was identified on VFA in 63 (28.3%) women with normal BMD (8.5% had grade 2/3 VFs) and in 145 (38.5%) with osteopenia (15.7% had grade 2/3 VFs). Stepwise regression analysis showed that presence of VFs was independently related to age, BMI, number of parity, history of peripheral fracture and lumbar spine BMD. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of women with asymptomatic VFs would not receive treatment if screening were based only on BMD evaluation. Our results support the recommendation to enlarge the indications of VFA in the presence of risk factors such as age over 60, multiparity, history of peripheral traumatic fractures and low BMI.

Vertebral fracture assessment in asymptomatic men and its impact on management.

INTRODUCTION: Recognition of vertebral fractures (VFs) change the patient's diagnostic classification, estimation of fracture risk, and threshold for pharmacological intervention. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) enables the detection of VFs in the same session as bone mineral density (BMD) testing. OBJECTIVE: To study prevalence and risk factors of VFs using VFA in asymptomatic men and measure its impact on patients' management. METHODS: We enrolled 791 men aged between 45 and 89 (mean age, weight and BMI of 62.4±8.6) (45 to 89) years, 74.9±12.7 (40 to 163) and 26.3±4.0 (16.6 to 43.8) kg/m(2), respectively. Lateral VFA images and scans of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were obtained using a GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy densitometer. VFs were defined using a combination of Genant semiquantitative (SQ) approach and morphometry. RESULTS: VFs were identified in 318 (40.3%): 206 (26.0%) had grade 1 and 112 (14.2%) had grade 2 or 3. As would be expected, the prevalence of VFA-detected fractures globally increased significantly with age and as BMI and BMD declined. A fracture was identified on VFA in 85 (32.4%) of men with normal BMD (6.9% had grade 2/3 VFs) and in 144 (35.8%) with osteopenia (11.7% had grade 2/3 VFs). Stepwise regression analysis showed that presence of VFs was independently related to the osteoporotic status (OR=4.761, 95%CI [2.956-7.668]; p<0.0001) and current smoking (OR=1.717, 95%CI [1.268-2.323]; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Our results support the recommendation to enlarge the indications of VFA to all the men referred for DXA measurement.

Vertebral fracture assessment in healthy men: prevalence and risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is a technology that can reliably and accurately diagnose vertebral fractures with greater patient convenience, less radiation exposure, and lower cost than standard spine radiography. OBJECTIVE: To study prevalence and risk factors of vertebral fractures using VFA in healthy men. METHODS: The study cohort consists of a population of 216 healthy men aged between 50 and 79 (mean age, weight and BMI of 63.8 years, 73.3 kg and 25.7 kg/m2, respectively). Lateral VFA images and scans of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were obtained by two technologists using a GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy densitometer. Vertebral fractures were defined using a combination of Genant semiquantitative (SQ) approach and morphometry. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of vertebrae from T4-L4 and 98% from T8-L4 were adequately visualized on VFA. Vertebral fractures were detected in 29.6% (64/216) of these men: 34/216 (15.7%) had grade 1 and 30/216 (13.8%) had grades 2 or 3. Twenty one of men with VFA-identified fracture (32.8%) had only a single vertebral fracture, while the other 67.2% had two or more. Fractures were most common in the mid-thoracic spine and at the thoraco-lumbar junction. As would be expected, the prevalence of VFA-detected fractures increased with age and as BMD declined. This group of men had a statistically significant lower weight, height, calcium consumption and T-score than those without a VFA-identified vertebral fracture. Regression analysis showed that presence of vertebral fracture was mainly related to the osteoporotic status (OR: 9.0; 95% CI: 3.5-22.8). CONCLUSION: VFA allows evaluation of the majority of vertebral bodies in men. Vertebral fractures are common in healthy men and are related to low BMD.