Isolated Polyethylene Exchange With Increased Constraint Is Comparable to Component Revision TKA for Instability in Properly Selected Patients.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic instability following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a leading cause of early failure. Most reports recommend component revision as the preferred treatment because of poor outcomes and high failure rates with isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange (ITPIE). However, these ideas have not been tested in modern implant systems that allow insert constraint to be increased. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 90 consecutive patients with minimum 2-year (mean 3.7 years) follow-up who underwent revision TKA for instability at a single institution. Mean age was 62.0 years (range, 41 to 83 years), and 73% of patients were women. Forty percent of patients were treated with ITPIE when standardized preoperative and intraoperative criteria were met; 60% underwent revision of one or both components when these criteria were not met. RESULTS: Patients experienced significant improvements in Knee Society (KS) knee (48.4 to 82.6; P < .001) and function (49.0 to 81.0; P < .001) scores. There were no significant differences in improvements in KS knee scores (38.1 vs 33.1; P = .18), KS function scores (36.0 vs 34.0; P = .63), or arc of motion (5° vs 6°; P = .88) between those treated with ITPIE and component revision. Failure rates were 19.4% in the ITPIE group vs 18.5% in the component revision group (odds ratio, 1.06; P = .91). Re-revision rates were significantly lower (6.3% vs 30.8%; odds ratio, 0.15; P = .004) when polyethylene insert constraint was increased. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, ITPIE is not inferior to component revision at addressing symptomatic instability following TKA. Degree of constraint should be increased whenever possible during revision surgery for instability.

Surgical induced models of joint degeneration in the ovine stifle: Magnetic resonance imaging and histological assessment.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to (1) validate and assess the reliability of a modified magnetic resonance semi-quantitative score (sheep Magnetic Resonance osteoarthritis Knee Score (sMOAKS)) to evaluate joint degeneration in the ovine knee and to (2) investigate whether the transection of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), isolated or in combination with meniscal injuries, reproduce the degenerative changes described in the meniscectomized sheep. METHODS: Twenty sheep were randomly subjected to one of the following injuries to induce osteoarthritis (OA): ACL transection (ACLt), mid-body transection of the medial meniscus, ACLt combined with complete medial meniscectomy and complete medial meniscectomy. OA assessment was performed eight weeks postoperatively with sMOAKS, Mankin and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histological scores. RESULTS: sMOAKS showed very good to excellent reliability (kappa=0.61 to 1.0) for the majority of features evaluated. sMOAKS revealed small differences between groups (p<0.05) being the ACLt group the most affected. We observed a strong positive correlation between the three scales in the evaluation of femoro-tibial articular cartilage (AC) (r=0.829, r=0.917, r=0.879). CONCLUSIONS: sMOAKS is a reliable semi-quantitative Magnetic Resonance (MR) scale to evaluate and quantify the effect of different OA induction lesions in the ovine knee and presents a high correlation with Mankin and OARSI scales in the evaluation of femoro-tibial AC. Although minor differences were observed between the different surgical procedures for the induction of OA, ACLt proved to be the intervention that produced the highest amount of degeneration eight weeks postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.