Health-related quality of life and estimation of the minimally important difference in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptom score in postmenopausal ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with low sensitivity to endocrine therapy.

BACKGROUND: The HORSE-BC study previously demonstrated that second-line endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with acquired endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) still provided a clinically meaningful benefit. Herein, we investigated the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the HORSE-BC study. METHODS: Patients with acquired endocrine-resistant MBC who were scheduled for second-line ET were recruited. The HRQOL was assessed at baseline, and 1 and 3 months after second-line ET initiation. To investigate the minimally important difference (MID) in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES), we evaluated the means and standard deviations for the distribution-based method, and differences in the change in HRQOL for the anchor-based method. We also investigated the association between FACT-ES total scores and clinical benefit. RESULTS: Overall, 56 patients were enrolled. Of these, 47 were analyzed. When defined as 1/3 standard deviation estimates based on the distribution method, the calculated MID was 5.9. The MIDs of the FACT-ES total scores based on the anchor method were 7.7 for decline and 4.1 for improvement. The MID decline proportions were 6.1% and 14.7% lower in patients who experienced clinical benefits than in those who did not at 1 and 3 months, respectively. The ratios of MID improvement in patients who experienced clinical benefits were 18.3% and 3.2% higher, respectively; the mean change in the FACT-ES total score from baseline improved in patients who experienced clinical benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining the HRQOL as determined by FACT-ES may be associated with clinical benefits in patients with acquired endocrine-resistant MBC treated with ET.

Cost-Effectiveness of Trastuzumab With or Without Chemotherapy as Adjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial, the RESPECT Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trastuzumab is a standard care as adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjCT) for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive primary breast cancer (BC) in Japan. However, no reports have evaluated its economics for patients with HER2-positive BC over 70 years of age. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HER2-targeted trastuzumab + chemotherapy in Japan, comparing it with trastuzumab monotherapy. METHODS: A three-state-partitioned survival model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab + chemotherapy versus trastuzumab monotherapy for AdjCT in elderly patients with HER2-positive BC. We derived the efficacy data, utilities, and costs of both arms from individual patient data in the RESPECT trial (NCT01104935) and published studies. The costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 2% per annum using a payer perspective. The respective cost estimates were reported in 2019 Japanese Yen (JPY) or US dollars (US$). The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We assured robustness with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The cost per patient for trastuzumab + chemotherapy was JPY 14.6 million (US$137,000), and their QALYs were 9.308, compared with JPY 14.2 million (US$131,000) and 9.101, respectively, for trastuzumab monotherapy. The ICER of trastuzumab + chemotherapy versus trastuzumab monotherapy was JPY 2.7 milllion/QALY (US$17,200/QALY). The ICER for trastuzumab with chemotherapy varied from "Dominant" to "Dominated" in one-way sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The base-case analysis suggests that AdjCT with trastuzumab + chemotherapy is likely to be a cost-effective choice for patients with HER2-positive BC aged 70 years or older. However, the sensitivity analysis suggested uncertainty regarding the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab + chemotherapy.

Oral care and oral assessment guide in breast cancer patients receiving everolimus and exemestane: subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial (Oral Care-BC).

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis is a clinically significant adverse event linked to cancer therapy; it reduces the quality of life of patients and may result in the discontinuation of treatment and a poorer prognosis. Based on level 3 evidence, the Mucositis Study Group of Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society of Oral Oncology recommend oral care for all patients receiving cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy, although no data from large-scaled randomized controlled trials support the efficacy of oral care in preventing oral mucositis. Therefore, this randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, phase III study sought to determine whether professional oral care reduces oral mucositis in everolimus and exemestane-treated estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Altogether, 169 patients were randomized into the professional oral care (n=82) and control (n=87) groups. The professional oral care group received oral health instruction, professional mechanical tooth and tongue cleaning, gargling with a benzethonium chloride mouthwash, and dexamethasone ointment when grade 1 mucositis manifested. The control group received oral health instruction and gargling. Eight weeks after the everolimus and exemestane administration, the oral status (Oral Assessment Guide criteria) and oral mucositis status (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events functional and clinical examinations) were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of oral mucositis of any grade and grade 2 severe mucositis was significantly lower in the professional oral care group, based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events functional and clinical examinations. The total Oral Assessment Guide score, total Oral Assessment Guide grade, and Oral Assessment Guide score of teeth/dentures and mucous membranes were significantly different between the two groups. The Oral Assessment Guide grade for swallow, lip, teeth/dentures, mucous membrane, tongue, and saliva significantly correlated to oral mucositis severity. CONCLUSIONS: Professional oral care may prevent oral mucositis and improve teeth/denture conditions in patients receiving everolimus and exemestane.

Hormonal Therapy Resistant Estrogen-receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Cohort (HORSE-BC) Study : Current Status of Treatment Selection in Japan.

The Hormonal therapy resistant estrogen-receptor positive metastatic breast cancer cohort (HORSE-BC) study is a multicenter observational study evaluating the efficacy and safety of secondary endocrine therapy (ET) for postmenopausal cases of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with poor response to primary ET. In this initial report we analyze the HORSE-BC baseline data to clarify the current status of treatment selection for MBC in Japan. Baseline data for the 50 patients enrolled in HORSE-BC were analyzed, including patient characteristics, types of secondary ET, and reasons for selecting secondary ET. Postoperative recurrence was detected in 84% of patients (42/50) and de novo stage IV breast cancer in 16% (8/50). Forty-one patients (41/50; 82%) received fulvestrant, 5 patients (10%) received selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), 3 patients (6%) received ET plus a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, and 1 patient received an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as the secondary ET. Forty-five patients selected their secondary ET based on its therapeutic effect, while 14 patients selected it based on side effects. Most patients with progression after primary ET selected fulvestrant as the secondary ET based on its therapeutic and side effects. We await the final results from the HORSE-BC study.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of S-1 therapy for first-line metastatic breast cancer treatment in Japan: results from the randomized phase III SELECT BC trial.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of replacing standard intravenous therapy (taxane) with oral S-1 therapy for first-line metastatic breast cancer treatment. METHODS: This cost-effectiveness analysis was based on data from a randomized phase III trial (SELECT BC). As cost-effectiveness was a secondary endpoint of the SELECT BC trial, some of the randomized patients participated in an EQ-5D survey (N = 391) and health economic survey (N = 146). The EQ-5D responses, claims, and prescription data were collected for as long as possible until death. The expected quality-adjusted life years (QALY) obtained from each treatment were calculated using patient-level EQ-5D data, and the expected cost was calculated using patient-level claim data. The analysis was performed from the perspective of public healthcare payers. RESULTS: The estimated EQ-5D least-square means and 95% CI up to 48 months were 0.764 (95% CI, 0.741-0.782) and 0.742 (95% CI, 0.720-0.764) in the S-1 and taxane arms, respectively. The expected QALY was 2.11 for the S-1 arm and 2.04 for the taxane arm, with expected costs of JPY 5.13 million (USD 46,600) and JPY 5.56 million (USD 50,500), respectively. These results show that S-1 is cost-saving. According to probabilistic sensitivity analysis, S-1 was dominant with a probability of 63%. When the willingness to pay (WTP) value was JPY 5 million (USD 45,500) per QALY, the probability of being cost-effective was 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the introduction of oral S-1 therapy for metastatic breast cancer is highly likely to be cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN CTR C000000416 . Registered on May 10, 2006.

Randomized study of taxane versus TS-1 in women with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer (SELECT BC).

This randomized controlled trial will compare oral 5-fluorouracil derivatives, TS-1, with intravenous standard chemotherapy such as taxanes in women with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. Patients with hormone-resistant breast cancer are assigned to either TS-1 (40-60 mg twice daily for 28 consecutive days, followed by a 14-day rest period) or standard chemotherapy (docetaxel 60-75 mg/m(2) at 3- or 4-week intervals, paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) at 3- or 4-week intervals or paclitaxel 80-100 mg/m(2) weekly, followed by a 1-week rest period). Treatment will be repeated until tumor progression or > or =4 courses for TS-1 and > or =6 courses for taxanes. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, adverse events, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness. A threshold hazard ratio of 1.333 will be used to determine whether overall survival in the TS-1 group is equivalent (not inferior) to that in the taxane group. The target number of registered patients is 600.

Assessment of different criteria for the pathological complete response (pCR) to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer: standardization is needed.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin in breast cancer patients. Evaluation and comparison of the pathological complete response (pCR) to this regimen according to various definitions in different clinical trials. Utilize the data to propose standardization of definitions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2001, 141 patients with stage II (tumor size >3.0 cm) or III breast cancer were treated with doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) followed by docetaxel 60 mg/m(2 )(AT) on day 1. A total of 4 courses of AT were administered as primary chemotherapy with intervals of 3 weeks. Additionally, 2 cycles of the same regimen were administered after surgery when clinical CR or PR was achieved; otherwise, 4 cycles of CMF were added postoperatively. RESULTS: 141 patients were enrolled in this trial. A clinical response rate was 86%. Seven patients (5%) achieved pCR according to the Japanese Breast Cancer Society classification, 14 patients (10%) fulfilled the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center trial's pCR criteria, and 19 patients (14%) met the NSABP trial pCR definition. NCI CTC version 2 grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (26%), neutropenia (85%) and febrile neutropenia (12%). CONCLUSION: Primary chemotherapy with AT induced modest tumor responses with tolerable toxicity. Differences in the definition of pCR among clinical trials caused substantial confusion in interpreting the trial results. Therefore, standardization of the pCR definition after primary chemotherapy is needed.

The outpatient management of low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia: risk assessment over the telephone.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the feasibility of the risk assessment over the telephone in the outpatient management of low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Febrile patients with neutropenia were eligible for outpatient management with oral ciprofloxacin if they demonstrated the following characteristics: resolution of neutropenia expected in <10 days, good performance status, controlled cancer, no symptoms or signs suggesting systemic infection other than fever, and no comorbidity requiring hospitalization. Eligible patients received oral ciprofloxacin (400 mg, three times daily) and were monitored as far as possible by telephone. Risk assessment concerning general condition was carried out over the telephone. RESULTS: Of the 60 consecutive patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a phase II trial of docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) and doxorubicin (50 mg/m(2)) for primary breast cancer, 30 low-risk febrile patients received oral ciprofloxacin. Twenty-seven of these patients (90%) recovered uneventfully without hospitalization and the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Treatment was considered to have failed in the remaining three (10%) on the account of the need to modify or change their regimens. CONCLUSIONS: For carefully selected low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia, risk assessment over the telephone may be convenient, and close daily medical scrutiny may be not routinely required in the outpatient.

Unknown primary carcinoma: a feasibility assessment of combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (Taxotere) and cisplatin are two of the most active single agents used in the treatment of solid tumors. We examined the feasibility of using a combination of docetaxel and cisplatin for the treatment of unknown primary carcinoma in order to prepare a larger scale prospective study. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less and a life expectancy of 8 weeks or more, and had been diagnosed as having unknown primary carcinoma by the required examinations. Patients were not permitted to have received prior chemotherapy and had to have measurable lesions. Docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously over a 1-h period immediately before cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)), which was given intravenously over a 2-h period, every 3 weeks. Premedication included dexamethasone, granisetron, and standard hyperhydration. RESULTS: Twenty-six treatment courses in five patients were tested according to the protocol and feasibility was assessed. Adverse events observed included grade 4 neutropenia, leukopenia, grade 3 nausea/vomiting, grade 2 diarrhea, and mucositis. These adverse events were well tolerated, reversible, and manageable. Doses were not reduced and all injections were given or their due date without any delay in all patients. Four patients achieved a partial response and one had stable disease. CONCLUSION: Treatment of patients with unknown primary carcinoma with a combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is feasible. Conduct of a phase II trial of this regimen is warranted.