Response Process Validity Evidence for Video Commentary Assessment in Surgery: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVES: Well-developed mental representations of a task are fundamental to proficient performance. 'Video Commentary' (VC) is a novel assessment intended to measure mental representations of surgical tasks that would reflect an important aspect of task proficiency. Whether examinees' actual response processes align with this intent remains unknown. As part of ongoing validation of the assessment, we sought to understand examinees' response processes in VC. DESIGN: Grounded theory qualitative study. In 2019, residents were interviewed about their understanding of and approach to VC. Using grounded theory, we created a theoretical model explaining relationships among factors that influence residents' response processes and performance. Residents' perceived purpose of VC was also explored using Likert-type questions. SETTING: Academic surgical residency program. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight surgical residents (PGY-1 to PGY-5). RESULTS: Analysis of narrative comments indicated that residents' perceived purposes of VC generally align with the educator's intent. Resident response processes are influenced by test characteristics, residents' perception and understanding of VC, and residents' personal characteristics. Four strategies seem to guide how residents respond, namely a focus on speed, points, logic, and relevance. Quantitative results indicated residents believe VC scores reflect their ability to speak quickly, ability to think quickly, and knowledge of anatomy (mean = 5.0, 4.5, and 4.4 respectively [1 = strongly disagree, 6 = strongly agree]). PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents tend to focus on naming facts whereas PGY-4 and PGY-5 residents focus on providing comprehensive descriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Residents generally have an accurate understanding of the purpose of VC. However, their use of different approaches could represent a threat to validity. The response strategies of speed, points, logic, and relevance may inform other clinical skills assessments.

Video Commentary: Rapid-Fire Assessment of Surgical Cognitive Skills.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the use of "Video Commentary", an assessment using a set of operative videos, to assess trainees' surgical cognitive skills (operative knowledge, spatial awareness, and surgical insight). DESIGN & SETTING: The Video Commentary assessment has been routinely administered to Postgraduate Year (PGY) 1-5 general surgery residents since 2014 as part of a biannual multistation, OSCE-type exam at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Video Commentary is a rapid-fire, 6-minute assessment, where trainees watch a series of 20 to 30 second operative video clips and comment on them as they play. Each clip varies in procedure, approach, difficulty, and complexity. The combination of video clips differs according to trainees' PGY level except for a few videos that overlap among PGY groups. The name of the procedure is provided at the beginning of each clip with a countdown timer showing in the corner of the screen. A comprehensive checklist is used to score trainees' performance in real-time. DISCUSSION: Assessment of trainees of different levels and staff surgeons show a positive correlation with the experience level (p = 0.0001). The assessment provides a safe alternative to assess trainees in the operating room and encourages them to become more effective communicators. With the use of technology, large video databases can be created to provide just-in-time tailored feedback to the trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Video Commentary can serve as a time and resource-efficient assessment of trainees' surgical cognitive skills and insight. The use and demand of real-time commentary on operative videos may provide a viable approach to help surgeon educators determine trainees' baseline, progression, and readiness to advance.

Inspiring Young Learners Toward a Career in Healthcare Using Simulation.

STATEMENT: To inspire young learners toward a career in healthcare and provide them opportunities to learn lifesaving skills, a hospital-based simulation center collaborated with a local middle school to develop a 88-minute simulation-based educational activity. The activity consisted of eight 10-minute stations on lifesaving and basic medical skills. One hundred fifty students participated. Evaluation surveys showed students favored stations with extensive hands-on activities and valued the opportunity to interact with health professionals. Students also reported more interest in science careers after the visit. This collaborative effort is time-efficient and low-budget simulation-based learning experience that had an immediate impact on middle school students.

Towards Development of an Open Surgery Competency Assessment for Residents (OSCAR) Tool - A Systematic Review of the Literature and Delphi Consensus.

OBJECTIVE: Competency-based education has mandated accurate intra-operative assessment tools. We aimed to define consensus-based open surgical skills perceived by experts as critical for assessment. DESIGN: A mixed-method design was employed: systematic review and e-Delphi methodology. SETTING: The study was performed at McGill University-affiliated large tertiary academic centers in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Per PRISMA guidelines, a peer-reviewed search strategy was employed. Studies published in English and those describing technical skill assessment of open abdominal surgery were included; subspecialty-specific skills, conference abstracts, academic memoirs were excluded. Most-cited skills were subjected to e-Delphi methodology to identify those deemed essential by experts, based a 3-point Likert scale. Eighteen McGill University-affiliated general surgeons, representing a variety of subspecialties of General Surgery, were invited to answer the questionnaire. RESULTS: Around 120 of 4285 references were retained for analysis. The 12 most cited skills included suturing, tissue and instrument handling, movement economy, instrument knowledge, knot tying, flow, knowledge of procedure, completion time, dissection technique, knowledge of anatomy and sterile technique; 6 of these achieved high or perfect scores and agreement after 2 rounds of survey: suturing, sterile technique, knot tying, knowledge of anatomy, knowledge of procedure, and tissue handling. Median standard deviation decreased (0.495 to 0.450) from first to second round, indicating improvement in consensus. CONCLUSION: These results will help develop and validate the OSCAR (objective structured clinical assessment rubric) assessment tool for immediate intra-operative feedback of open technical skills for surgical trainees.