Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 43(4): 20130332, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24645965

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability and accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) images obtained at different fields of view in detecting and quantifying simulated buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects. METHODS: Simulated buccal defects were prepared in 69 implants inserted into cadaver mandibles. CBCT images at three different fields of view were acquired: 40 × 40, 60 × 60 and 100 × 100 mm. The presence or absence of defects was assessed on three sets of images using a five-point scale by three observers. Observers also measured the depth, width and volume of defects on CBCT images, which were compared with physical measurements. The kappa value was calculated to assess intra- and interobserver agreement. Six-way repeated analysis of variance was used to evaluate treatment effects on the diagnosis. Pairwise comparisons of median true-positive and true-negative rates were calculated by the χ² test. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between measurements. Significance level was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: All observers had excellent intra-observer agreement. Defect status (p < 0.001) and defect size (p < 0.001) factors were statistically significant. Pairwise interactions were found between defect status and defect size (p = 0.001). No differences between median true-positive or true-negative values were found between CBCT field of views (p > 0.05). Significant correlations were found between physical and CBCT measurements (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: All CBCT images performed similarly for the detection of simulated buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects. Depth, width and volume measurements of the defects from various CBCT images correlated highly with physical measurements.


Assuntos
Processo Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/normas , Implantes Dentários , Doenças Mandibulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Perda do Osso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Perda do Osso Alveolar/patologia , Processo Alveolar/patologia , Cadáver , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Doenças Mandibulares/patologia , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 42(8): 20130176, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23956236

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) images obtained with and without artefact reduction (AR) in detecting simulated buccal peri-implant and buccal periodontal defects. METHODS: 42 implants inserted into edentulous mandibles, and 38 teeth present in dry mandibles were used. Simulated buccal peri-implant defects (n = 22) and buccal periodontal defects (n = 22) were prepared. 20 implants and 18 teeth without simulated defects were the control group. Images of the mandibles were obtained using a Planmeca ProMax(®) 3D Max CBCT unit (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Image reconstructions were prepared without and with low, medium and high AR modes. Images were viewed randomly by six observers twice for the presence of defects. Kappa coefficient was calculated. F2_LD_F1 design for non-parametric analysis of longitudinal data was used. Area under curves (AUCs) were calculated for each observer. Significance level was taken as α = 0.05. RESULTS: Intraobserver kappa ranged from 0.140 to 0.792 for peri-implant and from 0.189 to 1.0 for periodontal defects. All factors were statistically significant (p < 0.001), except for image mode and implant brand. Pairwise interactions were found between periodontal defects and peri-implant defects (p < 0.001), observers (p < 0.001), observer and image mode (p < 0.001), defect model and observer (p < 0.001) and defect model, image mode and observer (p = 0.04). AUC values ranged from 0.39 to 0.52 for peri-implant and from 0.45 to 0.71 for periodontal defects. Higher AUC values were found for periodontal defects than for peri-implant defects. CONCLUSIONS: Buccal peri-implant defects were more difficult to detect than buccal periodontal defects. No difference was found among CBCT images obtained with and without AR modes.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Artefatos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Ligas Dentárias , Implantes Dentários , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Processo Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Anatomia Transversal , Área Sob a Curva , Dente Pré-Molar/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Arcada Edêntula/diagnóstico por imagem , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagem , Dente Molar/diagnóstico por imagem , Variações Dependentes do Observador
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA