Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 67(3): 506-30, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24161465

RESUMO

Tests with vertebrates are an integral part of environmental hazard identification and risk assessment of chemicals, plant protection products, pharmaceuticals, biocides, feed additives and effluents. These tests raise ethical and economic concerns and are considered as inappropriate for assessing all of the substances and effluents that require regulatory testing. Hence, there is a strong demand for replacement, reduction and refinement strategies and methods. However, until now alternative approaches have only rarely been used in regulatory settings. This review provides an overview on current regulations of chemicals and the requirements for animal tests in environmental hazard and risk assessment. It aims to highlight the potential areas for alternative approaches in environmental hazard identification and risk assessment. Perspectives and limitations of alternative approaches to animal tests using vertebrates in environmental toxicology, i.e. mainly fish and amphibians, are discussed. Free access to existing (proprietary) animal test data, availability of validated alternative methods and a practical implementation of conceptual approaches such as the Adverse Outcome Pathways and Integrated Testing Strategies were identified as major requirements towards the successful development and implementation of alternative approaches. Although this article focusses on European regulations, its considerations and conclusions are of global relevance.


Assuntos
Alternativas aos Testes com Animais , Poluentes Ambientais/toxicidade , Substâncias Perigosas/toxicidade , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/legislação & jurisprudência , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/métodos , Alternativas aos Testes com Animais/tendências , Animais , Poluentes Ambientais/química , União Europeia , Regulamentação Governamental , Guias como Assunto , Substâncias Perigosas/química , Projetos de Pesquisa , Medição de Risco
2.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 73(2): 516-23, 2013 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23850125

RESUMO

The environmental impact of elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) levels has become of more interest in recent years. This, in relation to globally rising CO2 levels and related considerations of geological CO2 storage as a mitigating measure. In the present study effect data from literature were collected in order to conduct a marine ecological risk assessment of elevated CO2 levels, using a Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD). It became evident that information currently available from the literature is mostly insufficient for such a quantitative approach. Most studies focus on effects of expected future CO2 levels, testing only one or two elevated concentrations. A full dose-response relationship, a uniform measure of exposure, and standardized test protocols are essential for conducting a proper quantitative risk assessment of elevated CO2 levels. Improvements are proposed to make future tests more valuable and usable for quantitative risk assessment.


Assuntos
Dióxido de Carbono/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Água do Mar/química , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Animais , Organismos Aquáticos/fisiologia , Biologia Marinha , Medição de Risco
3.
Environ Health ; 11 Suppl 1: S6, 2012 Jun 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22759506

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The EU 6th Framework Program (FP)-funded Health and Environment Network (HENVINET) aimed to support informed policy making by facilitating the availability of relevant knowledge on different environmental health issues. An approach was developed by which scientific agreement, disagreement, and knowledge gaps could be efficiently identified, and expert advice prepared in a way that is usable for policy makers. There were two aims of the project: 1) to apply the tool to a relevant issue; the potential health impacts of the widely used plasticizers, phthalates, and 2) to evaluate the method and the tool by asking both scientific experts and the target audience, namely policy makers and stakeholders, for their opinions. METHODS: The tool consisted of an expert consultation in several steps on the issue of phthalates in environmental health. A diagram depicting the cause-effect chain, from the production and use of phthalates to potential health impacts, was prepared based on existing reviews. This was used as a basis for an online questionnaire, through which experts in the field were consulted. The results of this first round of consultation laid the foundation for a new questionnaire answered by an expert panel that, subsequently, also discussed approaches and results in a workshop. One major task of the expert panel was to pinpoint priorities from the cause-effect chain according to their impact on the extent of potential health risks and their relevance for reducing uncertainty. The results were condensed into a policy brief that was sent to policy makers and stakeholders for their evaluation. RESULTS: The experts agreed about the substantial knowledge gaps within the field of phthalates. The top three priorities for further research and policy action were: 1) intrauterine exposure, 2) reproductive toxicology, and 3) exposure from medical devices. Although not all relevant information from the cause-effect chain is known for phthalates, most experts thought that there are enough indications to justify a precautionary approach and to restrict their general use. Although some of the experts expressed some scepticism about such a tool, most felt that important issues were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: The approach used was an efficient way at summarising priority knowledge gaps as a starting point for health risk assessment of compounds, based on their relevance for the risk assessment outcome. We conclude that this approach is useful for supporting policy makers with state-of-the-art scientific knowledge weighed by experts. The method can assist future evidence-based policy making.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental , Saúde Ambiental/métodos , Política Ambiental , Poluentes Ambientais/toxicidade , Prova Pericial , Ácidos Ftálicos/toxicidade , Animais , Poluentes Ambientais/farmacocinética , Humanos , Ácidos Ftálicos/farmacocinética , Formulação de Políticas , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Environ Health ; 11 Suppl 1: S7, 2012 Jun 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22759507

RESUMO

AIM: Apply a recently developed expert elicitation procedure to evaluate the state of the current knowledge of the two brominated flame retardants (BFRs) most commonly used today; decabromo-diphenyl ether (decaBDE) and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) and their potential impact on human health in order to support policy considerations. This expert elicitation was organized by the HENVINET (Health and Environment Network) Consortium. METHOD: The HENVINET expert elicitation procedure that was used in the evaluations of decaBDE and HBCD is a rapid assessment tool aimed at highlighting areas of agreement and areas of disagreement on knowledge-related key issues for environment and health policy decision making. RESULTS: The outcome of the expert consultation on BFRs was concrete expert advice for policy makers with specific priorities for further action made clear for both stakeholders and policy makers. The experts were not in agreement whether or not the knowledge currently available on decaBDE or HBCD is sufficient to justify policy actions, but most experts considered that enough data already exists to support a ban or restriction on the use of these compounds. All experts agreed on the necessity of more research on the compounds. Priority issues for further research were, among others:• more studies on the extent of human exposure to the compounds.• more studies on the fate and concentration in the human body of the compounds.


Assuntos
Prova Pericial , Retardadores de Chama/toxicidade , Éteres Difenil Halogenados/toxicidade , Política de Saúde , Hidrocarbonetos Bromados/toxicidade , Saúde Ambiental , Humanos , Formulação de Políticas , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Environ Sci Technol ; 46(3): 1572-80, 2012 Feb 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22257214

RESUMO

Recent studies have indicated that in addition to narcosis certain chemicals in crude oils and refined petroleum products may induce specific modes of action, such as aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonism. The risks these toxic compounds pose to organisms depend on internal exposure levels, as driven by the chemicals' bioaccumulation potential. Information on this potential however is lacking, as the chemicals' identity mostly is unknown. This study showed that AhR agonists bioaccumulate from oil-spiked sediments into aquatic worms and persist in the worms for at least several weeks. Chemical fractionations of eight pure oils into saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA), followed by effect-directed analyses using in vitro reporter gene assays revealed that the agonists predominantly are aromatic and resin-like chemicals. Some of the compounds were easily metabolized in vitro, while others were resistant to biotransformation. HPLC-assisted hydrophobicity profiling subsequently indicated that the AhR-active chemicals had a high to extremely high bioaccumulation potential, considering their estimated logK(ow) values of 4 to >10. Most of the AhR agonism, however, was assigned to compounds with logK(ow) of 5-8. These compounds were present mainly in the mid to high boiling point fractions of the oils (C(14)-C(32) alkane range), which are usually not being considered (the most) toxic in current risk assessment. The fractionations further revealed considerable oil and fraction-dependent antagonism in pure oils and SARA fractions. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that crude oils and refined petroleum products contain numerous compounds that can activate the AhR and which because of their likely persistence and extremely high bioaccumulation potential could be potential PBT (persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic) or vPvB (very persistent and very bioaccumulative) substance candidates. Many chemicals were identified by GC-MS, but the responsible individual compounds could not be exactly identified in the complex mixtures of thousands of compounds. Because this obstructs a classical PBT risk assessment, our results advocate an adapted risk assessment approach for complex mixtures in which low concentrations of very potent compounds are responsible for mixture effects.


Assuntos
Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Hidrocarbonetos/farmacocinética , Hidrocarbonetos/toxicidade , Oligoquetos/metabolismo , Petróleo/análise , Receptores de Hidrocarboneto Arílico/agonistas , Animais , Fracionamento Químico , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Fluorescência , Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Hidrocarbonetos/química , Interações Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Oligoquetos/efeitos dos fármacos , Petróleo/toxicidade , Medição de Risco/métodos
6.
Environ Pollut ; 144(2): 581-95, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16530312

RESUMO

A risk assessment was made for a carnivorous and a herbivorous food chain in a heavily polluted natural estuary (Biesbosch), by determining the most critical pollutants and the food chain most at risk. Exposure of food chains to metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) was assessed by analyzing dietary concentrations, internal concentrations, and biomarkers of exposure. Common shrew (Sorex araneus) and bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) were selected as representative small mammal species for the carnivorous and herbivorous food chain, respectively, and earthworms (Lumbricus rubellus) and snails (Cepaea nemoralis) as representative prey species for the carnivorous food chain. Metals contributed most to the total risk for small mammals and earthworms. PCBs, but not PAHs, contributed to the overall risk for S. araneus at regularly flooded locations. The carnivorous food chain appeared most at risk given the higher exposure levels and bioaccumulating potency found for contaminants in S. araneus.


Assuntos
Desastres , Cadeia Alimentar , Substâncias Perigosas , Mamíferos/fisiologia , Metais/toxicidade , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/toxicidade , Animais , Ecossistema , Exposição Ambiental , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Países Baixos , Comportamento Predatório , Medição de Risco/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA