Assessment of Pembrolizumab Therapy for the Treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Among Patients in the KEYNOTE-059, KEYNOTE-061, and KEYNOTE-062 Clinical Trials.

IMPORTANCE: Immunotherapy has been associated with improved outcomes among patients who have received previous treatment for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antitumor activity of pembrolizumab therapy vs chemotherapy among patients with MSI-H advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer regardless of the line of therapy in which it was received. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This post hoc analysis of the phase 2 KEYNOTE-059 (third-line treatment or higher) single-arm trial and the phase 3 KEYNOTE-061 (second-line treatment) and KEYNOTE-062 (first-line treatment) randomized trials included patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer from 52 sites in 16 countries enrolled in KEYNOTE-059, 148 sites in 30 countries enrolled in KEYNOTE-061, and 200 sites in 29 countries enrolled in KEYNOTE-062. Patients were enrolled from March 2, 2015, to March 26, 2016, in KEYNOTE-059; from June 4, 2015, to July 26, 2016, in KEYNOTE-061; and from September 18, 2015, to May 26, 2017, in KEYNOTE-062, with data cutoff dates of August 8, 2018; October 26, 2017; and March 26, 2019; respectively. INTERVENTIONS: Pembrolizumab monotherapy in KEYNOTE-059, pembrolizumab monotherapy or chemotherapy (paclitaxel) in KEYNOTE-061, and pembrolizumab monotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine), or chemotherapy alone in KEYNOTE-062. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Response was assessed centrally using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), version 1.1; MSI-H status was determined centrally by polymerase chain reaction testing. RESULTS: At data cutoff, 7 of 174 patients (4.0%) in KEYNOTE-059, 27 of 514 patients (5.3%) in KEYNOTE-061, and 50 of 682 patients (7.3%) in KEYNOTE-062 had MSI-H tumors. Among those with MSI-H tumors, the median overall survival was not reached (NR) for pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-059, KEYNOTE-061, and KEYNOTE-062 or for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in KEYNOTE-062. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for pembrolizumab was NR (95% CI, 1.1 months to NR) in KEYNOTE-059 and 17.8 months (95% CI, 2.7 months to NR) in KEYNOTE-061 (vs 3.5 months [95% CI, 2.0-9.8 months] for chemotherapy). In KEYNOTE-062, the median PFS was 11.2 months (95% CI, 1.5 months to NR) for pembrolizumab, NR (95% CI, 3.6 months to NR) for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, and 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.4-8.3 months) for chemotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) for pembrolizumab was 57.1% in KEYNOTE-059 and 46.7% (vs 16.7% for chemotherapy) in KEYNOTE-061. In KEYNOTE-062, the ORR was 57.1% for pembrolizumab , 64.7% for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, and 36.8% for chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Findings from this study indicate that MSI-H status may be a biomarker for pembrolizumab therapy among patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer regardless of the line of therapy in which it was received. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02335411, NCT02370498, and NCT02494583.

Prospective Survey of Financial Toxicity Measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity in Japanese Patients With Cancer.

PURPOSE: We previously reported on the pilot study assessing the feasibility of using the Japanese translation of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool to measure financial toxicity (FT) among Japanese patients with cancer. In this study, we report the results of the prospective survey assessing FT in Japanese patients with cancer using the same tool. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were receiving chemotherapy for a solid tumor for at least 2 months. In addition to the COST survey, socioeconomic characteristics were collected by using a questionnaire and medical records. RESULTS: Of the 191 patients approached, 156 (82%) responded to the questionnaire. Primary tumor sites were colorectal (n = 77; 49%), gastric (n = 39; 25%), esophageal (n = 16; 10%), thyroid (n = 9; 6%), head and neck (n = 4; 3%), and other (n = 11; 7%). Median COST score was 21 (range, 0 to 41; mean ± standard deviation, 12.1 ± 8.45), with lower COST scores indicating more severe FT. On multivariable analyses using linear regression, older age (ß, 0.15 per year; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28; P = .02) and higher household savings (ß, 8.24 per ¥15 million; 95% CI, 4.06 to 12.42; P < .001) were positively associated with COST score; nonregular employment (ß, -5.37; 95% CI, -10.16 to -0.57; P = .03), retirement because of cancer (ß, -5.42; 95% CI, -8.62 to -1.37; P = .009), and use of strategies to cope with the cost of cancer care (ß, -5.09; 95% CI, -7.87 to -2.30; P < .001) were negatively associated with COST score. CONCLUSION: Using the Japanese version of the COST tool, we identified various factors associated with FT in Japanese patients with cancer. These findings will have important implications for cancer policy planning in Japan.

A prospective survey of comprehensive score for financial toxicity in Japanese cancer patients: report on a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Financial toxicity (FT) has a negative impact on the quality of life and survival of patients with cancer. The comprehensive score for FT (COST) questionnaire is a tool to measure FT which has already been validated in patients with cancer in the United States. However, the feasibility and validity of assessing FT using the COST questionnaire have not been established in non-US healthcare settings, including that in Japan. METHODS: This is a prospective pilot survey to ascertain the feasibility of using the COST questionnaire to evaluate FT in Japanese patients with advanced solid cancer who had been receiving chemotherapy for at least 2 months. The COST questionnaire was translated into Japanese using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy methodology. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients approached, 11 (92%) responded to the questionnaire. The median COST score was 22 (range, 6-29; mean ± SD, 20.18 ± 8.17). Five (45%) and two (18%) patients suffered grade 1 (COST score 14-25) and grade 2 (COST score 1-13) FT, respectively. The COST measure demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach α of 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: The COST measure demonstrated good feasibility in measuring FT in the Japanese healthcare setting. Despite the existing universal health insurance system and ceiling amount for high-cost medical expenses, some Japanese patients experienced meaningful FT during chemotherapy. A prospective study is already underway to confirm the preliminary results (UMIN: 000025043).

Pharmacokinetic assessment of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38-glucuronide: a substudy of the FIRIS study.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its metabolites in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving the combination of CPT-11/S-1 (IRIS) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/l-leucovorin (LV)/CPT-11 (FOLFIRI) regimens in the FIRIS trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum CPT-11, SN-38 (an active metabolite of CPT-11), and SN-38-glucuronide concentrations were compared between the IRIS and FOLFIRI regimens, and between days 1 and 15 of administration. Correlations between pharmacokinetic data and incidence of neutropenia and diarrhea were also assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 or its metabolites between days 1 and 15. SN-38 concentrations were correlated with the occurrence of neutropenia, which was significantly more frequent in the FOLFIRI group than in the IRIS group. CONCLUSION: No alterations in CPT-11 pharmacokinetics after repeated IRIS or FOLFIRI administration were observed. Neutropenia was more frequent in the FOLFIRI group than in the IRIS group because exposure to SN-38 was greater in the former group.

[Investigating the incidence of injection-site reactions associated with administration of oxaliplatin into a peripheral vein and management local adverse reactions].

In Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, we investigated the incidence of injection-site reactions associated with the administration of Oxaliplatin into a peripheral vein. We evaluated the frequency and severity of symptoms, and studied ways to manage its adverse reactions from September 2009 through March 2010. Oxaliplatin was injected into a peripheral vein in more than 90% of patients, suggesting that there would be a high risk of injection-site reactions. About 60% of patients had a numeric rating score of 5 or higher in this study, and more than 60% of injection-site reactions were improved by warming the injection site. Our results suggest that warming the injection site is one effective way to manage local adverse reactions when Oxaliplatin is administered into a peripheral vein.