Higher odds of meniscectomy compared with meniscus repair in a young patient population with increased neighbourhood disadvantage.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on the management of isolated meniscus tears in young patients and to identify trends in surgical management of meniscus tears based on surgeon volume. METHODS: Data from a large healthcare system on patients aged 14-44 years who underwent isolated meniscus surgery between 2016 and 2022 were analysed. Patient demographics, socioeconomic factors and surgeon volume were recorded. Patient age was categorised as 14-29 years and 30-44 years old. Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a measure of neighbourhood disadvantage with increased ADI corresponding to more disadvantage, was grouped as <25th, 25-75th and >75th percentile. Multivariate comparisons were made between procedure groups while univariate comparisons were made between surgeon groups. RESULTS: The study included 1552 patients treated by 84 orthopaedic surgeons. Older age and higher ADI were associated with higher odds of undergoing meniscectomy. Patients of older age and with non-private insurance were more likely to undergo treatment by a lower-volume knee surgeon. Apart from the year 2022, higher-volume knee surgeons performed significantly higher rates of meniscus repair compared with lower-volume knee surgeons. When controlling for surgeon volume, higher ADI remained a significant predictor of undergoing meniscectomy over meniscus repair. CONCLUSION: Significant associations exist between patient factors and surgical choices for isolated meniscus tears in younger patients. Patients of older age and with increased neighbourhood disadvantage were more likely to undergo meniscectomy versus meniscus repair. While higher-volume knee surgeons favoured meniscus repair, a growing trend of meniscus repair rates was observed among lower-volume knee surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, level III.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis may be more cost-effective than independent anterolateral ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and economic analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Anterolateral augmentation during primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) may lower rates of ACL graft failure. However, differences in costs between two techniques, lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR), are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis comparing LET versus ALLR in the setting of primary ACLR. The hypothesis was that LET is more cost-effective than ALLR. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review was conducted on studies in which patients underwent primary ACLR with a concomitant LET or ALLR with minimum 24 months follow-up published between January 2013 and July 2023. Primary outcomes included ACL graft failure rates and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey-Quality of Life (KOOS-QoL) subscale scores, which were used to determine health utilities measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. A decision tree model with one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses compared the cost of primary ACLR with a concomitant LET, independent autograft ALLR, or independent allograft ALLR. Costs were estimated using a combination of QALYs, institution prices, literature references, and a survey sent to 49 internationally recognized high-volume knee surgeons. FINDINGS: A total of 2505 knees undergoing primary ACLR with concomitant LET (n=1162) or ALLR (n=1343) were identified from 22 studies. There were 77 total ACL graft failures with comparable failure rates between patients receiving LET versus ALLR (2.9% vs. 3.2%, P=0.690). The average QALYs gained was slightly higher for those who received LET (0.77) compared to ALLR (0.75). Survey results revealed a 5 minute longer median self-reported operative time for ALLR (20 â€‹min) than LET (15 â€‹min). The estimated costs for LET, autograft ALLR, and allograft ALLR were $1,015, $1,295, and $3,068, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Anterolateral augmentation during primary ACLR with LET is more cost-effective than independent autograft and allograft ALLR given the lower costs and comparable clinical outcomes. Surgeons may utilize this information when determining the optimal approach to anterolateral augmentation during primary ACLR, although differences in preferred technique and health care systems may influence operative efficiency and material costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review; Level of evidence, IV.

Optimal assessment for anterior talofibular ligament injury utilizing stress ultrasound entails internal rotation during plantarflexion.

OBJECTIVES: An optimal load and ankle position for stress ultrasound of the injured anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) are unknown. The objectives of this study were to compare stress ultrasound and ankle kinematics from a 6 degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) robotic testing system as a reference standard for the evaluation of injured ATFL and suggest cut-off values for ultrasound diagnosis. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric ankles were used. Loads and ankle positions examined by the 6-DOF robotic testing system were: 40 N anterior load, 1.7 Nm inversion, and 1.7 Nm internal rotation torques at 30° plantarflexion, 15° plantarflexion, and 0° plantarflexion. Bony translations were measured by ultrasound and a robotic testing system under the above conditions. After measuring the intact ankle, ATFL was transected at its fibular attachment under arthroscopy. Correlations between ultrasound and robotic testing systems were calculated with Pearson correlation coefficients. Paired t-tests were performed for comparison of ultrasound measurements of translation between intact and transected ATFL and unloaded and loaded conditions in transected ATFL. RESULTS: Good agreement between ultrasound measurement and that of the robotic testing system was found only in internal rotation at 30° plantarflexion (ICC â€‹= â€‹0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.94). At 30° plantarflexion, significant differences in ultrasound measurements of translation between intact and transected ATFL (p â€‹< â€‹0.01) were found in response to 1.7 Nm internal rotation torque and nonstress and stress with internal rotation (p â€‹< â€‹0.01) with mean differences of 2.4 â€‹mm and 1.9 â€‹mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the data of this study, moderate internal rotation and plantarflexion are optimal to evaluate the effects of ATFL injury when clinicians utilize stress ultrasound in patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.