Standardization of ileoanal J-pouch surgery technique: Quality assessment of minimally invasive ileoanal J-pouch surgery videos.

BACKGROUND: Ileal pouch anal anastomosis is a complex procedure associated with significant morbidity, with several complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery leading to pouch failure. The aim of the study is to evaluate the heterogeneity surrounding the technique of ileoanal J-pouch surgery by assessing the safety and quality of published online peer-reviewed surgical videos. METHODS: Ileal pouch anal anastomosis videos published on peer-reviewed surgical journals and video channels were edited and anonymized to demonstrate specific steps of the surgical procedure: mobilization and division of the rectum, formation of the ileoanal J-pouch reservoir, anastomosis, and lengthening techniques. The anonymized videos were presented to a group of reviewers with expertise in ileal pouch anal anastomosis blinded to the names and affiliations of the surgeons performing the procedure. Primary outcome was the rate of interobserver variability in the assessment of specific technical steps of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery procedure. Secondary outcome was the appropriateness of the use of surgical videos review as an assessment tool for ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery, measured as rate of reviewers being unable to answer for poor video quality. RESULTS: In total, 29 video fragments were distributed, and 13 assessors completed a 60-item survey, organized in 7 major domains. The survey completion rate was 93.4%. Out of a total 729 answers, in 23 (3.2%) the reviewers indicated they were unable to comment due to poor video image, and in 48 (6.5%) were unable to comment due to the particular step not being shown in the procedure. The proportion of assessors rating rectal mobilization technically appropriate ranged from 30.7% to 92.3% and from 7.7% to 69.2% for safety. The level of rectal division was considered appropriate in 0 to 53.8% of the videos, whereas the stapling technique used for rectal division was appropriate in 0 to 70% of the videos. CONCLUSION: Our study assessed published peer-reviewed videos on ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery and reported heterogeneity in the safety of the demonstrated techniques. Blind assessment of published peer-reviewed ileal pouch anal anastomosis videos reported a high rate of unsafe or inappropriate technique for rectal mobilization and transection in the reviewed videos, with fair interobserver agreement among reviewers. There is a need for consensus on what is considered safe and appropriate in ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. Peer review of ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery videos could facilitate training and accreditation in this complex procedure.

Healthcare use, work loss and total costs in incident and prevalent Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: results from a nationwide study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on population-wide assessment of cost in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). AIM: To estimate the societal cost of actively treated CD and UC in Sweden. METHODS: We identified 10 117 prevalent CD and 19 762 prevalent UC patients, aged ≥18 years on 1 January 2014 and 4028 adult incident CD cases and 8659 adult incident UC cases (2010-2013) from Swedish Patient Register. Each case was matched to five population comparators. Healthcare costs were calculated from medications, outpatient visits, hospitalisations and surgery. Cost of productivity losses was derived from disability pension and sick leave. RESULTS: The mean annual societal costs per working-age patient (18-64 years) with CD and UC were $22 813 (vs $7533 per comparator) and $14 136 (vs $7351 per comparator), respectively. In patients aged ≥65 years, the mean annual costs of CD and UC were $9726 and $8072 vs $3875 and $4016 per comparator, respectively. The majority of cost for both CD (56%) and UC (59%) patients originated from productivity losses. Higher societal cost of working-age CD patients as compared to UC patients was related to greater utilisation of anti-TNF (22.2% vs 7.4%) and increased annual disability pension (44 days vs 25 days). Among incident CD and UC patients, the mean total cost over the first year per patient was over three times higher than comparators. CONCLUSION: In Sweden, the societal cost of incident and prevalent CD and UC patients was consistently two to three times higher than the general population.

Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus IPAA for the Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Markov Decision Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ileorectal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis results in decreased postoperative morbidity and better functional outcome but leads to increased risk for rectal cancer compared with IPAA. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare ileorectal anastomosis with IPAA in ulcerative colitis by using a decision model. DESIGN: A Markov simulation model was designed to simulate clinical events of ileorectal anastomosis and IPAA over a time horizon of 40 years with time cycles of 1 year. All probabilities and utilities were derived from observational studies, identified after a systematic literature search using MEDLINE. Primary outcomes were life-years and quality-adjusted life-years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. SETTINGS: A decision model using Markov simulation was designed. PATIENTS: The base case was a 35-year-old patient with ulcerative colitis and a relatively preserved rectum. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were (quality-adjusted) life-years. RESULTS: The model resulted in lower life-years (36.22 vs 37.02) and higher quality-adjusted life-years (33.42 vs 31.57) for ileorectal anastomosis. This was confirmed after probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The model was sensitive to the utility of ileorectal anastomosis, IPAA, and end-ileostomy. A higher proportion of patients with ileorectal anastomosis will develop rectal cancer (7.6% vs 3.2%) and 43.5% of all patients with ileorectal anastomosis will end with an ileostomy as opposed to 23.0% of all patients with IPAA. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by characteristics inherent to modeling studies, including assumptions necessary to build the model, data input based on best available but often limited evidence, and unavoidable extra- and interpolation of data. CONCLUSIONS: Ileorectal anastomosis was the preferred treatment option when quality-adjusted life-years were the outcome, with higher life-years for IPAA. This model highlights that both surgical strategies are useful in patients who have ulcerative colitis with a relatively spared rectum. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B249. ANASTOMOSIS ILEORRECTAL VERSUS ANASTOMOSIS ANAL CON RESERVORIO ILEAL EN EL TRATAMIENTO QUIRÚRGICO DE LA COLITIS ULCEROSA: ANÁLISIS DE DECISIÓN DE MARKOV: Las anastomosis ileorrectales en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa se encuentran asociadas con la disminución de la morbilidad postoperatoria y un mejor resultado funcional, pero conducen a un mayor riesgo de cáncer de recto cuando se las compara con casos de confección de un reservorio íleo-anal.Comparar las anastomosis ileorrectales con la anastomosis de un reservorio íleo-anal en casos de colitis ulcerosa, utilizando un modelo de procesos de decisión.Se diseñó un modelo de proceso de Markov para simular eventos clínicos en casos de anastomosis ileorrectales y anastomosis de reservorios íleo-anales en un horizonte temporal de 40 años comprendiendo ciclos temporales de 1 año. Todas las probabilidades y utilidades se derivaron de estudios observacionales, identificados después de una búsqueda sistemática de literatura usando MEDLINE. Los resultados primarios fueron años de vida y los años ajustados a la calidad de vida. Se realizaron los análisis de sensibilidad determinada y de probabilística.Se diseñó un modelo de decisión utilizando el proceso de simulación de Markov.El caso base fue el de un paciente de 35 años con colitis ulcerosa y con un recto relativamente sano.El resultado principal fué la medida de los años de vida (con ajuste en la calidad de vida).El modelo resultó en menos años de vida (36.22 frente a 37.02) y años de vida de menor calidad (33.42 frente a 31.57) para los casos de anastomosis ileorrectales. Esto se confirmó después del análisis de sensibilidad probabilística. El modelo era sensible a la utilidad de la anastomosis ileorrectal, la anastomosis del reservorio íleo-anal y la ileostomía terminal. Una mayor proporción de pacientes con anastomosis ileorectales desarrollarán cáncer de recto (7,6% frente a 3,2%) y el 43,5% de todos los pacientes con anastomosis ileorrectales terminarán con una ileostomía en comparación con el 23,0% de todos los pacientes con un reservorio íleo-anal.El analisis estuvo limitado por las características inherentes a los estudios de modelado, incluidas las suposiciones necesarias para construir el modelo, la entrada de datos basada en la mejor evidencia disponible pero a menudo limitada y la extrapolación e interpolación inevitable de datos.Las anastomosis ileorrectales fueron la opción de tratamiento preferida cuando el resultado fue ajustado en años con calidad de vida, con años de vida más larga para la anastomosis de reservorios íleo-anales. Este modelo destaca que ambas estrategias quirúrgicas son útiles en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa con rectos relativamente sanos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B249.

Sick Leave and Disability Pension in Prevalent Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Crohn's disease may affect the ability to work and lead to permanent disability. We aimed to investigate work loss in prevalent patients. METHODS: We identified patients with Crohn's disease and general population comparators matched by sex, birth year, healthcare region and education. We assessed days of sick leave and disability pension retrieved from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency and estimated the absolute and relative risk of receiving disability pension [minimum 25% work impairment]. RESULTS: In 2014, the 20638 Crohn's disease patients [median age 44 years] had more than twice as many mean lost workdays [disability pension: 44; sick leave: 19] as the 102038 comparators [disability pension: 20; sick leave: 8], mean difference 35 days [95% confidence interval 33-37]. However, the majority had no lost workdays [68% of patients and 85% of comparators]. The proportion of patients receiving disability pension was 15% (6.5% in the comparators, risk ratio 2.34 [2.25-2.43]) and was higher in all subgroups, especially in female patients [28% vs 13% in the comparators], in those with ≤9 years of education [41% vs 23%] and in ages 60-64 years [46% vs 25%]. The relative risk of disability pension within the patient cohort [adjusted for age, sex, region and education] was higher in patients with complicated disease behaviour, extraintestinal manifestations, need of surgery or treatment with biologics. The differences between patients and comparators remained when comparing other calendar years [2006-2013]. CONCLUSION: Work loss was found in approximately one-third of patients. The mean number of lost workdays was twice as high as in the comparators.