Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 292, 2022 Mar 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35303812

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Detection of the ROS1 rearrangement is mandatory in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to allow targeted therapy with specific inhibitors. However, in Spanish clinical practice ROS1 determination is not yet fully widespread. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical and economic impact of sequentially testing ROS1 in addition to EGFR and ALK in Spain. METHODS: A joint model (decision-tree and Markov model) was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of testing ROS1 strategy versus a no-ROS1 testing strategy in Spain. Distribution of ROS1 techniques, rates of testing, positivity, and invalidity of biomarkers included in the analysis (EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1) were based on expert opinion and Lungpath real-world database. Treatment allocation depending on the molecular testing results was defined by expert opinion. For each treatment, a 3-states Markov model was developed, where progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were parameterized using exponential extrapolations to model transition of patients among health states. Only medical direct costs were included (€ 2021). A lifetime horizon was considered and a discount rate of 3% was applied for both costs and effects. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to address uncertainty. RESULTS: A target population of 8755 patients with advanced NSCLC (non-squamous or never smokers squamous) entered the model. Over a lifetime horizon, the ROS1 testing scenario produced additional 157.5 life years and 121.3 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with no-ROS1 testing scenario. Total direct costs were increased up to € 2,244,737 for ROS1 testing scenario. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was 18,514 €/QALY. Robustness of the base-case results were confirmed by the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that ROS1 testing in addition to EGFR and ALK is a cost-effective strategy compared to no-ROS1 testing, and it generates more than 120 QALYs in Spain over a lifetime horizon. Despite the low prevalence of ROS1 rearrangements in NSCLC patients, the clinical and economic consequences of ROS1 testing should encourage centers to test all advanced or metastatic NSCLC (non-squamous and never-smoker squamous) patients.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Rearranjo Gênico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Proteínas Tirosina Quinases/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/metabolismo , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Biópsia/economia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economia , Masculino , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Espanha
2.
J Clin Med ; 10(13)2021 Jul 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34279469

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) diagnosis lays on histological assessment through a kidney biopsy, given the absence of accurate non-invasive biomarkers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different urinary inflammation-related cytokines for the diagnostic of ATIN and its distinction from acute tubular necrosis (ATN). METHODS: We included 33 patients (ATIN (n = 21), ATN (n = 12)), and 6 healthy controls (HC). We determined the urinary levels of 10 inflammation-related cytokines using a multiplex bead-based Luminex assay at the time of biopsy and after therapy, and registered main clinical, analytical and histological data. RESULTS: At the time of biopsy, urinary levels of I-TAC/CXCL11, CXCL10, IL-6, TNFα and MCP-1 were significantly higher in ATIN compared to HC. A positive correlation between the extent of the tubulointerstitial cellular infiltrates in kidney biopsies and the urinary concentration of I-TAC/CXCL11, MIG/CXCL9, CXCL10, IL17, IFNα, MCP1 and EGF was observed. Notably, I-TAC/CXCL11, IL-6 and MCP-1 were significantly higher in ATIN than in ATN, with I-TAC/CXCL11 as the best discriminative classifier AUC (0.77, 95% CI 0.57-0.95, p = 0.02). A combinatory model of these three urinary cytokines increased the accuracy in the distinction of ATIN/ATN compared to the individual biomarkers. The best model resulted when combining the three cytokines with blood eosinophil and urinary leukocyte counts (LR = 9.76). Follow-up samples from 11ATIN patients showed a significant decrease in I-TAC/CXCL11, MIG/CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary I-TAC/CXCL11, CXCL10, IL6 and MCP-1 levels accurately distinguish patients developing ATIN from ATN and healthy individuals and may serve as novel non-invasive biomarkers in this disease.

3.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 689, 2021 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34112097

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Currently biomarkers play an essential role in diagnosis, treatment, and management of cancer. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) determination of biomarkers such as ALK, EGFR, ROS1 or PD-L1 is mandatory for an adequate treatment decision. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical and economic impact of current anaplastic lymphoma kinase testing scenario in Spain. METHODS: A joint model, composed by decision-tree and Markov models, was developed to estimate the long-term health outcomes and costs of NSCLC patients, by comparing the current testing scenario for ALK in Spain vs a hypothetical no-testing. The current distribution of testing strategies for ALK determination and their sensitivity and specificity data were obtained from the literature. Treatment allocation based on the molecular testing result were defined by a panel of Spanish experts. To assess long-term effects of each treatment, 3-states Markov models were developed, where progression-free survival and overall survival curves were extrapolated using exponential models. Medical direct costs (expressed in €, 2019) were included. A lifetime horizon was used and a discount rate of 3% was applied for both costs and health effects. Several sensitivity analyses, both deterministic and probabilistic, were performed in order test the robustness of the analysis. RESULTS: We estimated a target population of 7628 NSCLC patients, including those with non-squamous histology and those with squamous carcinomas who were never smokers. Over the lifetime horizon, the current ALK testing scenario produced additional 5060 and 3906 life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), respectively, compared with the no-testing scenario. Total direct costs were increased up to € 51,319,053 for testing scenario. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 10,142 €/QALY. The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of the base-case results, being the treatment allocation and the test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity data) the key drivers of the model. CONCLUSIONS: ALK testing in advanced NSCLC patients, non-squamous and never-smoker squamous, provides more than 3000 QALYs in Spain over a lifetime horizon. Comparing this gain in health outcomes with the incremental costs, the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio reinforces that testing non-squamous and never-smoker squamous NSCLC is a cost-effective strategy in Spain.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Testes Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Quinase do Linfoma Anaplásico/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Simulação por Computador , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Testes Genéticos/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/genética , Medicina de Precisão/economia , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Medicina de Precisão/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Espanha/epidemiologia
4.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 44(9): 1419-1424, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685760

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As nutritional status plays an important role in outcomes after surgery, this study evaluated the association between preoperative nutritional status (NS) and postoperative outcomes after major resection for lung cancer. METHODS: We identified 219 patients with a diagnosis of cancer who underwent pulmonary resection from 2010 to 2012. Preoperative NS was assessed by anthropometric and biological parameters, body mass index (BMI), and the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI). We stratified this population into 4 BMI groups: underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese and 4 NRI groups: well-nourished; mildly malnourished; moderately malnourished and severely malnourished. The outcomes measured were postoperative complications; 30-day postoperative mortality; hospital length of stay (LOS), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We performed both unadjusted analysis and adjusted multivariable analysis, controlling for statistically significant variables. RESULTS: Mean BMI and NRI were, respectively, 26.5 ± 4.3 and 112.4 ± 3.3. There were no significant differences between BMI categories and resection type, pathological stage, or overall postoperative complications. By contrast, significant differences (p < 0.05) in postoperative complications were observed among the NRI groups. LOS was longer in underweight and/or malnourished patients. In terms of OS, we found no significant differences according to NRI and BMI; however, patients with underweight had significantly shorter DFS compared with patients with overweight and obesity (log-rank p-value = 0.001). CONCLUSION: NS as measured by the NRI is an independent predictor of the risk of postsurgical complications, regardless of clinicopathologic characteristics. NRI might therefore be an useful tool for identifying early-stage lung cancer patients at risk for postoperative complications.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Avaliação Nutricional , Estado Nutricional , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Pulmonares/métodos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Br J Cancer ; 118(5): 639-647, 2018 03 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29381689

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) increases survival in patients with inoperable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is no consensus on the treatment of elderly patients. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and its ability to predict toxicity in this setting. METHODS: We enrolled 85 consecutive elderly (⩾75 years) participants, who underwent CGA and the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13). Those classified as fit and medium-fit by CGA were deemed candidates for cCRT (platinum-based chemotherapy concurrent with thoracic radiation therapy), while unfit patients received best supportive care. RESULTS: Fit (37%) and medium-fit (48%) patients had significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) (23.9 and 16.9 months, respectively) than unfit patients (15%) (9.3 months, log-rank P=0.01). In multivariate analysis, CGA groups and VES-13 were independent prognostic factors. Fit and medium-fit patients receiving cCRT (n=54) had mOS of 21.1 months (95% confidence interval: 16.2, 26.0). In those patients, higher VES-13 (⩾3) was associated with shorter mOS (16.33 vs 24.3 months, P=0.027) and higher risk of G3-4 toxicity (65 vs 32%, P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive geriatric assessment and VES-13 showed independent prognostic value. Comprehensive geriatric assessment may help to identify elderly patients fit enough to be treated with cCRT.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Consenso , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Platina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA