Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0241056, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33125395

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: As Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) are conceived to mimic the effects of common illicit drugs, they represent a serious public health challenge due to the spike in intoxications and fatalities that have been linked to their use. This study aims to provide epidemiological data on NPS use in the USA, determining lifetime prevalence of use and defining demographic, socioeconomic, drug use patterns and mental health correlates. METHODS: This study uses secondary data from the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), which is a large cross-sectional population-based survey carried out annually in the USA. We analysed data from 2007-14 (N = 307,935) using bivariate descriptive analysis and binary logistic regression to calculate prevalence and determine factors underlying NPS consumption. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI's were calculated for a set of selected independent variables. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our analysis NSDUH from 2007-14 highlights an increase in NPS use among adults, especially among white young men aged 18 to 25. Although the level of education of NPS users was relatively higher as compared to non-users, NPS users seemed to have a less wealthy situation. However, socioeconomic vulnerability appeared to be less important than mental health issues as a correlate to NPS use. NPS users seem to have followed a pattern of polysubstance use throughout their life, which involves both traditional illicit drugs and classic synthetic drugs. As NPS use seemed to be more prevalent among people having mental health issues, the rise in their use may have a negative impact on population mental health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Further comparative research on trends in NPS use and potential public health responses would be instrumental for developing appropriate health interventions, including drug checking, education for users and training for healthcare professionals working both within emergency wards and in/outpatient addiction and mental health services.


Assuntos
Comportamento Aditivo/epidemiologia , Drogas Ilícitas/efeitos adversos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Mental , Psicotrópicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Comportamento Aditivo/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Psicotrópicos/administração & dosagem , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/etiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 188, 2019 Feb 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30808282

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Delayed vaccination increases the time infants are at risk for acquiring vaccine-preventable diseases. Factors associated with incomplete vaccination are relatively well characterized in resource-limited settings; however, few studies have assessed immunization timeliness. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study examining Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis (DTP) vaccination timing among newborns enrolled in a Neonatal Vitamin A supplementation trial (NEOVITA) conducted in urban Dar es Salaam (n = 11,189) and rural Morogoro Region (n = 19,767), Tanzania. We used log-binomial models to assess the relationship of demographic, socioeconomic, healthcare access, and birth characteristics with late or incomplete DTP1 and DTP3 immunization. RESULTS: The proportion of infants with either delayed or incomplete vaccination was similar in Dar es Salaam (DTP1 11.5% and DTP3 16.0%) and Morogoro (DTP1 9.2% and DTP3 17.3%); however, the determinants of delayed or incomplete vaccination as well as their magnitude of association differed by setting. Both maternal and paternal education were more strongly associated with vaccination status in rural Morogoro region as compared to Dar es Salaam (p-values for heterogeneity < 0.05). Infants in Morogoro who had fathers and mothers with no education had 36% (95% CI: 22-52%) and 22% (95% CI: 10-34%) increased risk of delayed or incomplete DTP3 vaccination as compared to those with primary school education, respectively. In Dar es Salaam, mothers who attended their first antenatal care (ANC) visit in the 3rd trimester had 1.55 (95% CI: 1.36-1.78) times the risk of delayed or not received vaccination as compared to those with a 2nd trimester booking, while there was no relationship in Morogoro. In rural Morogoro, infants born at home had 17% (95% CI: 8-27%) increased risk for delayed or no receipt of DTP3 vaccination. In both settings, younger maternal age and poorer households were at increased risk for delayed or incomplete vaccination. CONCLUSION: We found some risk factors for delayed and incomplete vaccination were shared between urban and rural Tanzania; however, we found several context-specific risk factors as well as determinants that differed in their magnitude of risk between contexts. Immunization programs should be tailored to address context-specific barriers and enablers to improve timely and complete vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/uso terapêutico , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Suplementos Nutricionais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Mães , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Tanzânia , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/métodos , Vitamina A/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA