Simplified Assessment of the Index of Microvascular Resistance.

BACKGROUND: To validate a simplified invasive method for the calculation of the index of microvascular resistance (IMR). METHODS: This is a prospective, single-center study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes presenting with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. IMR was obtained using both intravenous (IV) adenosine and intracoronary (IC) papaverine. Each IMR measurement was obtained in duplicate. The primary objective was the agreement between IMR acquired using adenosine and papaverine. Secondary objectives include reproducibility of IMR and time required for the IMR measurement. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen IMR measurements were performed in 29 patients. The mean age was 68.8 ± 7.24 years, and 27.6% was diabetics. IMR values were similar between papaverine and adenosine (17.7 ± 7.26 and 20.1 ± 8.6, p=0.25; Passing-Bablok coefficient A 0.58, 95% CI -2.42 to 3.53; coefficient B 0.90, 95% CI -0.74 to 1.07). The reproducibility of IMR was excellent with both adenosine and papaverine (ICC 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.88 and ICC 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97). The time needed for microvascular assessment was significantly shortened by the use of IC papaverine (3.23 (2.84, 3.78) mins vs. 5.48 (4.94, 7.09) mins, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: IMR can be reliably measured using IC papaverine with similar results compared to intravenous infusion of adenosine with increased reproducibility and reduced procedural time. This approach simplifies the invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation in the catheterization laboratory.

Mismatch between morphological and functional assessment of the length of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Morphological evaluation of coronary lesion length is a paramount step during invasive assessment of coronary artery disease. Likewise, the extent of epicardial pressure losses can be measured using longitudinal vessel interrogation with fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks. We aimed to quantify the mismatch in lesion length between morphological (based on quantitative coronary angiography, QCA, and optical coherence tomography, OCT) and functional evaluations. METHODS: This is a prospective and multicenter study of patients evaluated by QCA, OCT and motorized fractional flow reserve pullbacks (mFFR). The difference in lesion length between the functional and anatomical evaluations was referred to as FAM. RESULTS: 117 patients (131 vessels) were included. Median lesion length derived from angiography was 16.05 mm [11.40-22.05], from OCT was 28.00 mm [16.63-38.00] and from mFFR 67.12 mm [25.38-91.37]. There was no correlation between QCA and mFFR lesion length (r = 0.124, 95% CI -0.168-0.396, p = 0.390). OCT lesion length did correlate with mFFR (r = 0.469, 95% CI 0.156-0.696, p = 0.004). FAM was strongly associated with the improvement in vessel conductance with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), higher mismatch was associated with lower post-PCI FFR. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion length assessment differs between morphological and functional evaluations. The morphological-functional mismatch in lesion length is frequent, and influences the results of PCI in terms of post-PCI FFR. Integration of the extent of pressure losses provides clinically relevant information that may be useful for clinical decision-making concerning revascularization strategy.