RESUMO
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ +) individuals experience bias in healthcare with 1 in 6 LGBTQ + adults avoiding healthcare due to anticipated discrimination and overall report poorer health status compared to heterosexual and cisgendered peers. The Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) is a leading organization representing academic physicians and recognizes that significant physical and mental health inequities exist among LGBTQ + communities. As such, SGIM sees its role in improving LGBTQ + patient health through structural change, starting at the national policy level all the way to encouraging change in individual provider bias and personal actions. SGIM endorses a series of recommendations for policy priorities, research and data collection standards, and institutional policy changes as well as community engagement and individual practices to reduce bias and improve the well-being and health of LGBTQ + patients.
Assuntos
Homossexualidade Feminina , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Pessoas Transgênero , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Identidade de Gênero , BissexualidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transition from hospitalization to postdischarge care is a vulnerable period for patients. How the experience of this transition differs for patients with resident primary care physicians is unknown. METHODS: In a single, large academic primary care practice, we examined an inception cohort of consecutive hospitalizations and postdischarge visits of hospitalized patients with resident or faculty primary care physicians between 2008 and 2013. We compared patient demographics, readmission risk, and access to outpatient care between resident and faculty primary care physicians by using generalized estimating equations to account for repeated hospitalizations. RESULTS: We documented 8161 hospitalizations among patients with resident primary care physicians and 20,844 hospitalizations among patients with faculty primary care physicians. Hospitalized patients with resident primary care physicians were generally younger, more likely to be on Medicaid, and more likely to be African American (P < .001). Patients with resident primary care physicians were less likely to be seen within 7 and 30 days of discharge (adjusted relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.93 at 7 days; adjusted relative risk, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.92 at 30 days) and had an increased risk of readmission within 30 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.37). They also were considerably less likely to see their own provider at first follow-up (relative risk, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.52-0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with resident primary care physicians had lower rates of timely postdischarge follow-up, higher rates of readmission, and a lower likelihood of seeing their own provider than did patients with faculty primary care physicians. These findings highlight the challenges facing academic centers for patients with resident primary care physicians.