Racial and Social Determinants of Civilian Gunshot Wounds to the Head.

Objective: To assess the clinical, racial, and social characteristics of victims of Gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the head and assess for associations between these factors and outcomes. Summary Background Data: Previous literature has not focused on the association of race and socioeconomic factors with these specific injuries. Methods: We identified patients with GSWs to the head who presented to 2 urban academic medical centers between 1998 and 2020, and extracted patient-level demographic data, information about the clinical and surgical course, and outcomes at discharge and follow-up. Results: The cohort included 250 patients, 90% (n = 226) of whom were male, with a mean age of 28 years. Forty-five percent were white (n = 112), 19% Black (n = 48), 18% Latinx (n = 45), with 6% "other" (n = 16), and 12% "unknown" (n = 29). The majority of patients presented with assault-related trauma (n = 153, 61%) as compared to self-inflicted injuries (n = 97, 39%). Across the entire cohort, sex, age, race, and median income by ZIP code were not significant predictors of outcome. Victims of assault by GSW to the head were more likely to be age 18 or younger (OR 5.26, P = 0.01), between the ages of 19 and 33 years (OR 4.7, P = 0.001), Black (OR 6.66, P < .001), and Latinx (OR 2.65, P = 0.03). Most patients (n = 155, 63%) had a poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Score 3-6) at discharge. Conclusion: Age, race, and income status were not independent predictors of mortality or functional outcome at discharge in our population. Assault-related GSWs to the head mostly involved young Black or Latinx men of lower socioeconomic status, while self-inflicted injuries were largely seen in older white men.

Evolving Applications, Technological Challenges and Future Opportunities in Neuromodulation: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank.

The annual Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank provides a focal opportunity for a multidisciplinary ensemble of experts in the field of neuromodulation to discuss advancements and forthcoming opportunities and challenges in the field. The proceedings of the fifth Think Tank summarize progress in neuromodulation neurotechnology and techniques for the treatment of a range of neuropsychiatric conditions including Parkinson's disease, dystonia, essential tremor, Tourette syndrome, obsessive compulsive disorder, epilepsy and cognitive, and motor disorders. Each section of this overview of the meeting provides insight to the critical elements of discussion, current challenges, and identified future directions of scientific and technological development and application. The report addresses key issues in developing, and emphasizes major innovations that have occurred during the past year. Specifically, this year's meeting focused on technical developments in DBS, design considerations for DBS electrodes, improved sensors, neuronal signal processing, advancements in development and uses of responsive DBS (closed-loop systems), updates on National Institutes of Health and DARPA DBS programs of the BRAIN initiative, and neuroethical and policy issues arising in and from DBS research and applications in practice.

Effects of rural status on health outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation: a single center analysis of 388 patients.

Rural status of patients may impact health before and after pediatric LT. We used UI codes published by the USDA to stratify patients as urban or rural depending county residence. A total of 388 patients who had LT and who met criteria were included. Rejection, PTLD, and survival were used as primary outcome measures of post-LT health. UNOS Status 1 and PELD/MELD scores >20 were used as secondary outcome measures of poorer pre-LT health. Logistic regression models were run to determine associations. We did not find any statistically significant differences in pre- or post-LT outcomes with respect to rurality. Among rural patients, there was a general trend for decreased incidence of rejection (25.0% vs. 33.4%; OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.29-1.44), increased risk of PTLD (5.6% vs. 3.4%; OR 1.86, 95% CI 0.36-3.31), and decreased survival (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.34-2.13) after LT. Rural patients also tended to be sicker at the time of LT than patients from urban areas, with increased proportion of Status 1 (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.51-2.70) and PELD/MELD scores >20 (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.59-2.45). From a single center experience, we conclude that rurality did not significantly affect health outcomes after LT, although a larger study may validate the general trends that rural patients may have decreased rejection, increased PTLD, and mortality, and be in poorer health at the time of LT.