[The role of oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy in the assessment of dysphagia in neurological patients.] / Ruolo dello studio scintigrafico del transito orofaringoesofageo nella valutazione della disfagia nei pazienti affetti da patologia neurologica.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the role of oropharingoesophageal scintigraphy (OPES) in the management of neurological patients, investigating the clinical value of semiquantitative analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 39 neurological patients clinically evaluated and scored according to the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (DOSS) scale who underwent fibrolaryngoscopic swallowing examination (FEES) and OPES using a 99mTc-nanocolloid-radioblabelled semiliquid bolus. We calculated the following semiquantitative parameters: Oral Transit Time (OTT), Pharyngeal Transit Time (PTT), Esophageal Transit Time (ETT), Retention Index (RI), and Esophageal Emptying Rate (EER10s). Differences in OPES semiquantitative parameters between patients classified according to the DOSS scale were performed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Optimal semiquantitative parameters cut-off values that correlated with DOSS classification were investigated with ROC curves. The agreement between OPES, FEES and DOSS results was measured using Cohen's Kappa test (K). RESULTS: A significantly higher OTT (p=0.028), PTT (p=0.011) and ETT (p=0.030) and lower EER10s (p=0.016) values were identified. Moderate agreement resulted between OPES and DOSS results (k=0.429, 95%CI: 0.143-0.715, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a significant correlation between clinical dysphagia graded using DOSS scale and semiquantitative parameters obtained by OPES evaluation. Despite reliable and reproducible OPES results, allowing an adequate study also of the esophageal phase, nowadays scintigraphic study remains an underestimated method to be considered in the diagnosis of dysphagia and related complications.

Is whole body low dose CT still necessary in the era of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessment of bone disease in multiple myeloma patients?

OBJECTIVE: Whole body low dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is the first-choice imaging modality to identify bone involvement in multiple myeloma (MM). Because the unenhanced LDCT co-registered to positron emission tomography (PET) (LDCT/PET) has similar technical characteristics to WBLDCT, we aimed to assess its reliability in the detection of bone disease, for employing fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT as unique multimodality imaging method in MM patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty three consecutive MM patients were prospectively enrolled and evaluated with WBLDCT to assess bone involvement. In addition, patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT using a disease-tailored optimized LDCT protocol. To compare both methods, skeletal anatomical regions were identified and a per-region and per-patient analysis were performed using Cohen's k test. Low dose computed tomography/PET sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were also calculated. RESULTS: The two imaging modalities resulted highly concordant considering both patient-based (k=0.841) and region-based analysis; some discrepancies were observed in dorsal spine (k=0.809) and thorax (k=0.756). Low dose computed tomography/PET sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 89.4%, 98.3% and 93.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low dose computed tomography co-registered PET has comparable performance to WBLDCT. If confirmed on a lager sample, these encouraging results suggest the possibility to use this multimodal hybrid imaging as the only method for MM evaluation, rather than both exams, providing both morphologic and metabolic information in one session with impact on patient compliance, health care spending and especially radiation exposure.