Commercial transplants in local Pakistanis from vended kidneys: a socio-economic and outcome study.

Donor shortage and absence of transplant law lead to unrelated commercial transplants in Pakistan. We report the socio-economic and outcome parameters of 126 local recipients of unrelated kidney vendor transplants presenting to our institute between 1997 and 2007. Their outcome was compared with 180 recipients of living-related donor transplants matched for age, gender and transplant duration as controls. Age of commercial recipients was 35.63 +/- 11.57 years with an M:F ratio of 2.4:1. Majority (92%) were transplanted in northern Pakistan paying US$7271 +/- 2198. All were educated with 50% being graduates or above and rich earning a monthly salary of US$517 +/- 518 with 44% earning >US$500. Comparison of commercial recipients with controls showed high comorbidities 35 (28%) vs. 14 (8%) (P = 0.0001) with diabetes, hepatitis-C and cardiovascular diseases. Donor age was 29.97 +/- 6.16 vs. 32.63 +/- 9.3 years (P = 0.035). Biologic agents induction in 101 (80%) vs. 14 (8%) (P = 0.0001), acute rejections in 42 (33%) vs. 31 (17%) (P = 0.005), 1-year creatinine 1.84 +/- 1.28 vs. 1.27 +/- 0.4 mg/dl (P = 0.0001), surgical complications 28 (22%) vs. 14 (8%) (P = 0.001), tuberculosis 14 (11%) vs. 6 (6%) (P = 0.007), acute hepatitis 20 (16%) vs. 3 (2%) (P = 0.0001), cytomegalovirus 33 (26%) vs. 21 (11%) (P = 0.001) and recurrent urinary tract infection 35 (28%) vs. 30 (16%) (P = 0.034). Overall 1- and 5-year graft survival was 86% and 45% vs. 94% and 80%, respectively (P = 0.00001). Total deaths were 34 (27%) vs. 12 (6.0%) (P = 0.001). In conclusion, recipients of the vended kidneys are poor candidates, educated, rich and often self-selecting. Their outcome is poor, which will leave them poorer still and back to dialysis if not death.

Comparison of holmium: Yag laser and pneumatic lithoclast in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare holmium Yag laser with lithoclast in patients with renal stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A comparative cross sectional study was performed on 60 patients undergoing PCNL. Patients with a 2.5 cm stone in renal pelvis, having preoperative negative urine culture, no coagulopathy and fit for general anaesthesia were included, pregnant females were excluded. They were randomly divided into 2 groups of 30 cases each depending on the energy source used. Group A included cases of PCNL subjected to laser treatment and group B had patients undergoing PCNL with pneumatic lithoclast. For each group duration of procedure, any per operative or postoperative complication, residual stone, duration of hospital stay and cost of each procedure were recorded. RESULTS: The average operative time was 125.7 +/- 31.1 minutes in group A and 98.5 +/- 18.7 minutes in group B (P = 0.0001). The overall complication rate was similar in both groups being 13.3% in group A and 23.3% in group B. Residual stone was observed in 17% cases in group A and 13% cases in group B (P = 0.5). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.17 +/- 1.6 days in group A and 4 +/- 2.3 days in group B (P = 0.4). Cost analysis showed that the initial capital cost of equipment was 40,000 Euro in laser and 24,000 Euro in pneumatic lithoclast. However because of reuse of fiber the per procedure cost was 60 Euro in laser and 50 Euro in lithoclast group. CONCLUSION: In our experience we found that Holmium: YAG laser and pneumatic lithoclast are both effective and safe lithotriptors for percutaneous stone removal. More operating time was required in laser, more complications encountered with pneumatic lithoclast and a high initial cost of laser. However with increasing experience with laser, more promising results are expected with this new technology. The cost can be compensated by using it in other procedures especially at a public sector hospital.