Serial assessment of hepatic encephalopathy in patients hospitalised for acute decompensation of cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent complication of cirrhosis, but the clinical and prognostic significance of the progression of mental status in hospitalised cirrhotics is unknown. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of serial evaluation of HE in patients hospitalised for acute decompensation (AD) of cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n=293) were evaluated for HE (West-Haven criteria) at admission and at day-3 and classified in two groups: (1) Absent or improved HE: HE absent at admission and at day-3, or any improvement at day-3; (2) Unfavourable progression: Development of HE or HE present at admission and stable/worse at day-3. RESULTS: Unfavourable progression of HE was observed in 31% of patients and it was independently associated with previous HE, Child-Pugh C and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). MELD score and unfavourable progression of HE were independently associated with 90-day mortality. The 90-day Kaplan-Meier survival probability was 91% in patients with MELD<18 and absent or improved HE and only 31% in subjects with both MELD≥18 and unfavourable progression of HE. Unfavourable progression of HE was also related to lower survival in patients with or without ACLF. Worsening of GCS at day-3 was observed in 11% of the sample and was related with significantly high mortality (69% vs. 27%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Among cirrhotics hospitalised for AD, unfavourable progression of HE was associated with high short-term mortality and therefore can be used for prognostication and to individualise clinical care.

Applicability of Sepsis-3 criteria and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in patients with cirrhosis hospitalised for bacterial infections.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: An algorithm including Sepsis-3 criteria and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) was recently proposed to predict severity of infection in cirrhosis. However, its applicability among patients without a baseline SOFA available for Sepsis-3 definition is unknown. We sought to investigate the applicability and prognostic value of qSOFA and Sepsis-3 criteria in patients with cirrhosis hospitalised for bacterial infections, without pre-hospitalisation SOFA. METHODS: In this cohort study, 164 patients were followed up to 30 days. Data collection, including the prognostic models, was performed at admission and at day-3. RESULTS: All patients fulfilled Sepsis-3 criteria (admission SOFA ≥ 2) and, therefore, admission Sepsis-3 was not included in further analysis. Admission qSOFA was an independent predictor of survival (HR = 2.271, P = 0.015). For patients initially classified as high risk by qSOFA, Chronic Liver Failure - Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA) was the only prognostic predictor. Among patients initially classified as low risk by qSOFA, the following parameters evaluated at day-3 were independent predictors of survival: qSOFA, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and Child-Pugh classification. Although not independently related to survival, Sepsis-3 criteria at day-3 was associated with lower 30-day survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis (66% vs 85%, P = 0.008). However, prognosis was better predicted by day-3 qSOFA, with 30-day Kaplan-Meier survival probability of 88% when qSOFA < 2 and 24% among those with qSOFA ≥ 2. CONCLUSION: Sepsis-3 criteria evaluated at admission are very limited in infected patients with cirrhosis without baseline SOFA. qSOFA was independently related to survival and appears to be a valuable tool for determining severity of infection and to follow patients initially classified as low risk.