Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 0(0): 1-42, 2023 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37910839

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Dental implant manufacturers recommend healing abutments (HA) be used for single-patient use; however, reuse on multiple patients following decontamination and sterilization is common. This study aims to evaluate four decontamination strategies utilizing enzymatic agents, available in most clinical settings, to determine the level to which biomaterial can be removed in a group of previously used HA (uHA). Secondly, to determine the degree to which the decontaminated HA are capable of inducing an inflammatory response in-vitro compared to new, never used HA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty HA were collected following 2-4 weeks of intraoral use and distributed randomly into 5 test groups (Group A-E; n = 10/group). Group A: Enzymatic cleaner foam + Autoclave; Group B: Ultrasonic bath with enzymatic cleaner + Autoclave; Group C: Prophy jet + Enzymatic cleaner foam + Autoclave; Group D: Prophy jet + ultrasonic bath with enzymatic cleaner + Autoclave; Group E: Prophy jet + Autoclave. Ten new, sterile HA served as controls (Group "Control"). Residual protein concentration was determined by a Micro BCA protein assay while HA from each group were stained with Phloxine B and macroscopically examined for the presence of debris. To examine the inflammatory potential, human primary macrophages were exposed to HA and supernatant levels of 9 cytokines/chemokines profiles were analyzed using a multiplex bead assay. RESULTS: All test groups presented with differences in the degree of visual decontamination compared to Controls, with Groups D and E displaying the most effective surface debris removaland reduced protein concentration. Of the detoxification strategies, Groups D and E removed the greatest biomaterial while least effective was Group A. However, compared to Controls, multiplex assays revealed high levels of inflammatory cytokine secretion up to 5 days from all Test Groups (A-E) irrespective of the decontamination method used. CONCLUSION: Our study found that compared to new, never used HA, decontamination of uHA utilizing enzymatic cleaners failed to reestablish inert HA surfaces and prevent an inflammatory immune response in-vitro. Clinicians should not reuse HA even after attempts to decontaminate and sterilize HA surfaces.

2.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 17(2): 384-94, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23763591

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This pilot study evaluated the molecular, histologic, and radiographic healing of bone to instrumentation with piezoelectric or high speed rotary (R) devices over a 3-week healing period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Wilmington, MA, USA) underwent bilateral tibial osteotomies prepared in a randomized split-leg design using Piezotome® (P1) (Satelec Acteon, Merignac, France), Piezotome 2® (P2) (Satelec Acteon), High-speed R instrumentation, or sham surgery (S). At 1 week, an osteogenesis array was used to evaluate differences in gene expression while quantitative analysis assessed percentage bone fill (PBF) and bone mineral density (BMD) in the defect, peripheral, and distant regions at 3 weeks. Qualitative histologic evaluation of healing osteotomies was also performed at 3 weeks. RESULTS: At 1 week, expression of 11 and 18 genes involved in bone healing was significantly (p < .05) lower following P1 and P2 instrumentation, respectively, relative to S whereas 16 and 4 genes were lower relative to R. No differences in PBF or BMD were detected between groups within the osteotomy defect. However, significant differences in PBF (p = .020) and BMD (p = .008) were noted along the peripheral region between P2 and R groups, being R the group with the lowest values. Histologically, smooth osteotomy margins were present following instrumentation using P1 or P2 relative to R. CONCLUSIONS: Piezoelectric instrumentation favors preservation of bone adjacent to osteotomies while variations in gene expression suggest differences in healing rates due to surgical modality. Bone instrumented by piezoelectric surgery appears less detrimental to bone healing than high-speed R device.


Assuntos
Osteotomia/instrumentação , Piezocirurgia/instrumentação , Tíbia/cirurgia , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Animais , Densidade Óssea , Expressão Gênica , Osteogênese , Projetos Piloto , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Microtomografia por Raio-X
3.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 25(11): 1273-1285, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24118318

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the early temporal-wide genome transcription regulation by the surface topography at the bone-implant interface of implants bearing microroughened or superimposed nanosurface topology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four commercially pure titanium implants (2.2 × 5.0 mm) with either a moderately roughened surface (TiOblast) or super-imposed nanoscale topography (Osseospeed) were placed (n = 2/surface) in edentulous sites of eleven systemically healthy subjects and subsequently removed after 3 and 7 days. Total RNA was isolated from cells adherent to retrieved implants. A whole-genome microarray using the Affymetrix Human gene 1.1 ST Array was used to describe the gene expression profiles that were differentially regulated by the implant surfaces. RESULTS: There were no significant differences when comparing the two implant surfaces at each time point. However, the microarray identified several genes that were differentially regulated at day 7 vs. day 3 for both implant surfaces. Functionally relevant categories related to the extracellular matrix (ECM), collagen fibril organization, and angiogenesis were upregulated at both surfaces (day7 vs. day3). Abundant upregulation of several differential markers of alternative activated macrophages was observed (e.g., MRC1, MSR1, MS4A4A, SLC38A6, and CCL18). The biological processes involved with the inflammatory/immune response gene expression were concomitantly downregulated. CONCLUSIONS: Gene regulation implicating collagen fibrillogenesis and ECM organization as well as the inflammatory/immune responses involving the alternative activated pathway are observed in implant adherent cells at early (3-7 days) after implantation. These gene expression events may indicate a pivotal role of collagen fibrillogenesis as well as immunomodulation in altering bone accrual and biomechanical physical properties of the implant-bone interface.


Assuntos
Interface Osso-Implante/anatomia & histologia , Implantes Dentários , Osseointegração/genética , Transcrição Gênica/genética , Idoso , Sistemas de Transporte de Aminoácidos Neutros/genética , Antígenos CD20/genética , Biomarcadores/análise , Quimiocinas CC/genética , Colágeno/genética , Materiais Dentários/química , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Matriz Extracelular/genética , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Humanos , Ativação de Macrófagos/genética , Masculino , Glicoproteínas de Membrana , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neovascularização Fisiológica/genética , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/genética , Receptores Imunológicos/genética , Receptores Depuradores Classe A/genética , Propriedades de Superfície , Titânio/química
4.
Int J Dent ; 2012: 894815, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22754572

RESUMO

Objective. This preclinical pilot study evaluated the systemic, radiographic, and histological responses to bone putty containing lidocaine in a canine tooth extraction model. Methods. In five beagle dogs the right mandibular premolars were extracted and sockets grafted with (1) xenograft particulate bone and a collagen sponge plug (control), (2) bone putty alone, (3) bone putty mixed with xenograft (3 : 1), or (4) xenograft sandwiched between bone putty. At 6 weeks post-op, the systemic and local responses were evaluated using a blood chemistry panel, micro-CT, and histological analyses. Results. No significant differences in blood chemistries were noted at 6 weeks postgrafting compared to baseline. Sockets grafted with either bone putty formulation demonstrated comparable radiographic and histologic evidence of bone healing compared to control sockets. Conclusions. Our preclinical results indicate that this bone putty appears to be a safe biocompatible device that may be useful in the postoperative management of tooth extractions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA