Telerehabilitation in individuals with severe acquired brain injury: Rationale, study design, and methodology.

BACKGROUND: Severe acquired brain injury (SABI) rehabilitation should be as intensive and long as to allow the patients get the best independence and quality of life (QoL), but facing with the rehabilitation socioeconomic burden. Telerehabilitation (TR) could supply frail subjects requiring long-term rehabilitation. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, parallel design, single-blind trial will be conducted at the IRCCS Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo (Messina, Italy) and IRCCS Hospital San Camillo (Venice, Italy) involving patients suffering from SABI and requiring home motor and cognitive rehabilitation. We will investigate the use of TR, based on advanced Information and Communication Technology (ICT) solutions, taking into account that the supervision of rehabilitation at home will be enriched with the counseling and vital parameters monitoring. The enrolled patients will be balanced for pathology, and randomized in 2 groups, performing TR (G1) or standard rehabilitation training (G2), respectively, according to a pc-generated random assignment. TR will be delivered by means of an advanced video-conferencing system, whereas the patient will be provided with low-cost monitoring devices, able to collect data about his/her health status and QoL. In both the groups each treatment (either cognitive or motor, or both as per patient functional status) will last about 1 hour a day, 5 days/week, for 12 weeks. Two structured telephone interviews will be administered to the patients (when possible) and/or their caregivers, and to all the healthcare professionals involved in the patient management, 1 week after the beginning and at the end of the TR. All the patients will undergo a complete neurological and cognitive examination performed by skilled physicians and psychologists, blindly. Clinical evaluations will be administered blindly, before and after the treatments. RESULTS: the data of this study should demonstrate that TR is at least non-inferior in comparison with the same amount of usual territorial rehabilitative physical treatments, taking into account patients' functional recovery, psychological well-being, caregiver burden, and healthcare costs. CONCLUSION: data coming from this study could demonstrate the usefulness of TR in facing the rehabilitation socioeconomic burden of managing patients with SABI, so to allow the patients get the best independence and quality of life (QoL).

Could autonomic system assessment be helpful in disorders of consciousness diagnosis? A neurophysiological study.

Although patients with chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC), including unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), show a limited repertoire of awareness signs, owing to a large-scale cortico-thalamo-cortical functional disconnectivity, an activation of some cortical areas in response to relevant stimuli has been described by means of electrophysiological and functional neuroimaging approaches. In addition, cognitive processes associated with autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses elicited by nociceptive stimuli have been identified in some DOC patients. In an attempt to identify ANS functionality markers that could be useful in differentiating UWS and MCS individuals, we measured the amplitude, latency and γ-band power (γPOW) of ultra-late laser-evoked potentials (CLEPs) and skin reflex (SR), which both express some aspects of cognitive processes related to ANS functionality, besides other ANS parameters either during a 24(hh)-polygraphy or following a solid-state laser repetitive nociceptive stimulation. MCS showed physiological modification of vital signs (O2 saturation, hearth rate, hearth rate variability) throughout the night and a preservation of SR-γPOW, whereas UWS did not show significant variations. Following repetitive nociceptive stimulation, MCS patients had a significant increase in CLEP-γPOW, O2 saturation, hearth rate, and hearth rate variability, whereas UWS individuals did not show any significant change (but two patients, who reached high Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores). Hence, our work suggests that a wide-spectrum electrophysiological evaluation of ANS functionality may support DOC differential diagnosis. Interestingly, the two above-mentioned UWS patients showed MCS-like vital sign modifications and electrophysiological pain responsiveness. It is therefore hypothesizable that our approach could be helpful in identifying residual aware autonomic system-related cognitive processes even in some UWS patients. Such issue draws the attention to either DOC clinical diagnosis or adequate pain treatment in DOC patients.

Evaluating Sativex® in Neuropathic Pain Management: A Clinical and Neurophysiological Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to better investigate the role of Sativex(®) in improving pain in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients by means of either clinical or neurophysiological assessment. SETTING: Pain is a common symptom of MS, affecting up to 70% of patients. Pain treatment is often unsatisfactory, although emerging drugs (including cannabinoids) are giving encouraging results. Clinical pain assessment in MS is very difficult, and more objective tools are necessary to better quantify this symptom and its potential response to the treatments. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 20 MS patients (10 with and 10 without neuropathic pain), who underwent a specific clinical (such as visual analog scale) and neurophysiological assessment (by means of laser-evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation), before and after 4 weeks of Sativex administration. RESULTS: One month of drug administration in MS patients with neuropathic pain successfully reduced pain rating and improved quality of life. Interestingly, such effects were paralleled by an increase of fronto-central γ-band oscillation and of pain-motor integration strength. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that Sativex may be effective in improving MS-related neuropathic pain, maybe through its action on specific cortical pathways.

Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now?

Gait abnormalities following neurological disorders are often disabling, negatively affecting patients' quality of life. Therefore, regaining of walking is considered one of the primary objectives of the rehabilitation process. To overcome problems related to conventional physical therapy, in the last years there has been an intense technological development of robotic devices, and robotic rehabilitation has proved to play a major role in improving one's ability to walk. The robotic rehabilitation systems can be classified into stationary and overground walking systems, and several studies have demonstrated their usefulness in patients after severe acquired brain injury, spinal cord injury and other neurological diseases, including Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy. In this review, we want to highlight which are the most widely used devices today for gait neurological rehabilitation, focusing on their functioning, effectiveness and challenges. Novel and promising rehabilitation tools, including the use of virtual reality, are also discussed.