Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Environ Res ; 213: 113609, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35667403

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides are persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that had been banned or restricted in many countries, including Spain. However, their ubiquity still poses environmental and human health threats. OBJECTIVE: To longitudinally explore public healthcare costs associated with long-term exposure to a mixture of 8 POPs in a cohort of residents of two areas of Granada Province, Southern Spain. METHODS: Longitudinal study in a subsample (n = 385) of GraMo adult cohort. Exposure assessment was performed by analyzing adipose tissue POP concentrations at recruitment. Average primary care (APC) and average hospital care (AHC) expenditures of each participant over 14 years were estimated using the data from their medical records. Data analyses were performed by robust MM regression, weighted quantile sum regression (WQS) and G-computation analysis. RESULTS: In the adjusted robust MM models for APC, most POPs showed positive beta coefficients, being Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) significantly associated (ß: 1.87; 95% Confidence interval (95%CI): 0.17, 3.57). The magnitude of this association increased (ß: 3.72; 95%CI: 0.80, 6.64) when the analyses were restricted to semi-rural residents, where ß-HCH was also marginally-significantly associated to APC (ß: 3.40; 95%CI: -0.10, 6.90). WQS revealed a positive but non-significant mixture association with APC (ß: 0.14; 95%CI: -0.06, 0.34), mainly accounted for by ß-HCH (54%) and HCB (43%), that was borderline-significant in the semi-rural residents (ß: 0.23; 95%CI: -0.01, 0.48). No significant results were observed in G-Computation analyses. CONCLUSION: Long-term exposure to POP mixtures might represent a modifiable factor increasing healthcare costs, thus affecting the efficiency of the healthcare systems. However, and owing the complexity of the potential causal pathways and the limitations of the present study, further research is warranted to fully elucidate ascertain whether interventions to reduce human exposure should be considered in healthcare policies.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ambientais , Hidrocarbonetos Clorados , Praguicidas , Bifenilos Policlorados , Adulto , Poluentes Ambientais/análise , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hexaclorobenzeno/análise , Humanos , Hidrocarbonetos Clorados/análise , Estudos Longitudinais , Poluentes Orgânicos Persistentes , Praguicidas/análise , Bifenilos Policlorados/análise , Espanha
2.
Fertil Steril ; 103(3): 699-706, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25557244

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of IVF-ICSI cycles with elective single-embryo transfer (eSET), plus elective single frozen embryo transfer (eSFET) if pregnancy is not achieved, compared with double-embryo transfer (DET). DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: Public hospital. PATIENT(S): A population of 121 women (<38 years old), undergoing their first or second IVF cycles. INTERVENTION(S): We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using the results of a prospective clinical trial. The women in group 1 received eSET plus eSFET, and those in group 2 received DET. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth delivery rate. RESULT(S): The cumulative live birth delivery rate was 38.60% in the eSET+eSFET group versus 42.19% in the DET group. The mean costs per patient were €5,614.11 in the eSET+eSFET group and €5,562.29 in the DET group. These differences were not statistically significant. The rate of multiple gestation was significantly lower in the eSET group than in the DET group (0 vs. 25.9%). CONCLUSION(S): This study does not show that eSET is superior to DET in terms of effectiveness or of costs. The lack of superiority of the results for the eSET+eSFET and the DET groups corroborates that the choice of strategy to be adopted should be determined by the context of the health care system and the individual prognosis.


Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro/economia , Transferência de Embrião Único/economia , Transferência de Embrião Único/métodos , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/economia , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Embrião de Mamíferos , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Congelamento , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
3.
Cir Cir ; 81(3): 207-13, 2013.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23769249

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The elevated prevalence of osteoarthritis in Western countries, the high costs of hip and knee arthroplasty, and the wide variations in the clinical practice have generated considerable interest in comparing the associated costs before and after surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of a number of variables on the costs of total knee and hip arthroplasty surgery during the hospital stay and during the one-year post-discharge. METHODS: A prospective multi-center study was performed in 15 hospitals from three Spanish regions. Relationships between the independent variables and the costs of hospital stay and postdischarge follow-up were analyzed by using multilevel models in which the "hospital" variable was used to group cases. Independent variables were: age, sex, body mass index, preoperative quality of life (SF-12, EQ-5 and Womac questionnaires), surgery (hip/knee), Charlson Index, general and local complications, number of beds and economic-institutional dependency of the hospital, the autonomous region to which it belongs, and the presence of a caregiver. RESULTS: The cost of hospital stay, excluding the cost of the prosthesis, was 4,734 Euros, and the post-discharge cost was 554 Euros. With regard to hospital stay costs, the variance among hospitals explained 44-46% of the total variance among the patients. With regard to the post-discharge costs, the variability among hospitals explained 7-9% of the variance among the patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable potential for reducing the hospital stay costs of these patients, given that more than 44% of the observed variability was not determined by the clinical conditions of the patients but rather by the behavior of the hospitals.


antecedentes: la alta prevalencia de artrosis en los países occidentales, el elevado costo de las intervenciones de artroplastia de cadera y rodilla y las amplias variaciones en la práctica médica generan gran interés por comparar los costos asociados antes y después de la cirugía. Objetivo: conocer el costo de las intervenciones de reemplazo total de cadera y rodilla durante la estancia hospitalaria y al año de seguimiento posterior al alta. material y métodos: estudio multicéntrico y prospectivo efectuado en 15 hospitales de tres comunidades autónomas. La relación entre las variables independientes con el costo de la estancia y costo post-alta, se analizó con modelos multinivel y para agrupar los casos se utilizó la variable "hospital." Las variables independientes fueron: edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, calidad de vida prequirúrgica (cuestionarios ED-5D, SF-12 y Womac), intervención (cadera-rodilla), índice Charlson, complicaciones, número de camas y dependencia económico-institucional del hospital, comunidad autó-noma y presencia de cuidador. Resultados: el costo promedio por paciente, sin incluir el costo de la prótesis, fue de 4,734 Euros ± 2,136 y el costo del seguimiento post alta de 554 Euros ± 509. Si se incluye el costo de la prótesis, al final del año el costo total asciende a 7,645 Euros ± 2,248. Conclusiones: existe un margen considerable en la reducción de los costos de estancia; más de 44% de la variabilidad observada no está determinada por las condiciones clínicas de los pacientes sino por el comportamiento de los centros hospitalarios.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/economia , Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Assistência ao Convalescente/economia , Idoso , Artroplastia de Quadril/reabilitação , Artroplastia do Joelho/reabilitação , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Seguimentos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prótese de Quadril/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/economia , Humanos , Prótese do Joelho/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha
4.
PLoS One ; 6(11): e27069, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22073256

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Illiteracy, a universal problem, limits the utilization of the most widely used short cognitive tests. Our objective was to assess and compare the effectiveness and cost for cognitive impairment (CI) and dementia (DEM) screening of three short cognitive tests applicable to illiterates. METHODS: Phase III diagnostic test evaluation study was performed during one year in four Primary Care centers, prospectively including individuals with suspicion of CI or DEM. All underwent the Eurotest, Memory Alteration Test (M@T), and Phototest, applied in a balanced manner. Clinical, functional, and cognitive studies were independently performed in a blinded fashion in a Cognitive Behavioral Neurology Unit, and the gold standard diagnosis was established by consensus of expert neurologists on the basis of these results. Effectiveness of tests was assessed as the proportion of correct diagnoses (diagnostic accuracy [DA]) and the kappa index of concordance (k) with respect to gold standard diagnoses. Costs were based on public prices at the time and hospital accounts. RESULTS: The study included 139 individuals: 47 with DEM, 36 with CI, and 56 without CI. No significant differences in effectiveness were found among the tests. For DEM screening: Eurotest (k = 0.71 [0.59-0.83], DA = 0.87 [0.80-0.92]), M@T (k = 0.72 [0.60-0.84], DA = 0.87 [0.80-0.92]), Phototest (k = 0.70 [0.57-0.82], DA = 0.86 [0.79-0.91]). For CI screening: Eurotest (k = 0.67 [0.55-0.79]; DA = 0.83 [0.76-0.89]), M@T (k = 0.52 [0.37-0.67]; DA = 0.80 [0.72-0.86]), Phototest (k = 0.59 [0.46-0.72]; DA = 0.79 [0.71-0.86]). There were no differences in the cost of DEM screening, but the cost of CI screening was significantly higher with M@T (330.7 ± 177.1 €, mean ± sd) than with Eurotest (294.1 ± 195.0 €) or Phototest (296.0 ± 196. 5 €). Application time was shorter with Phototest (2.8 ± 0.8 min) than with Eurotest (7.1 ± 1.8 min) or M@T (6.8 ± 2.2 min). CONCLUSIONS: Eurotest, M@T, and Phototest are equally effective. Eurotest and Phototest are both less expensive options but Phototest is the most efficient, requiring the shortest application time.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Demência/diagnóstico , Escolaridade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos Cognitivos/economia , Demência/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
5.
Gac Sanit ; 22(4): 337-43, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18755084

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Efficiency-based healthcare decision-making has been widely accepted for some time, with cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) as the main outcome measure. Nevertheless, for numerous medical procedures, little data are available on the cost per QALY gained. The aim of the present study was to calculate the cost per QALY gained with primary hip and knee replacement and to compare the result with the cost per QALY for other medical procedures, as well as with the maximum threshold cost considered acceptable in Spain. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort pre-test/post-test study of patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Age, sex, and clinical variables were recorded. Functional status and quality of life were measured by means of the WOMAC and EuroQol instruments, respectively, before the intervention and 6 months later. The direct costs of the intervention were calculated, with length of hospital stay and the prosthesis as the main cost drivers. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients, 40 from each intervention, were included in this study. Both functional and perceived health status improved after the intervention. The number of QALYs gained in the knee cohort was 4.64, while that in the hip cohort was 0.86. The total cost of knee replacement was lower (6,865.52 euro) than that of hip replacement (7,891.21 euro). The cost per QALY gained was 1,275.84 euro and 7,936.12 euro for knee and hip interventions, respectively. The calculations performed included a 6% discount rate for health outcomes, a 3% inflation rate for costs, and a success rate of 95% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of both knee and hip replacement were lower than the threshold of 30,000 euro per QALY considered acceptable in Spain, and compared favorably with other medical and surgical procedures.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/economia , Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha
6.
Gac Sanit ; 20(5): 382-90, 2006.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17040647

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Most studies on the costs of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) identify the total cost of the procedure with the direct cost, without considering important items such as overhead or intermediate costs. The objective of this study was to determine the cost per ART procedure in a public hospital in 2003 and to compare the results with those in the same hospital in 1998. METHODS: Data from the Human Reproduction Unit of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital in Granada (Spain) from 1998 and 2003 were analyzed. Since the total costs of the unit were known, the cost of the distinct ART procedures performed in the hospital was calculated by means of a methodology for cost distribution. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2003, the activity and costs of the Human Reproduction Unit analyzed evolved differently. Analysis of activity showed that some techniques, such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection, were consolidated while others, such as stimulation without assisted reproduction or intracervical insemination were abandoned. In all procedures, unit costs per cycle and per delivery decreased in the period analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Important changes took place in the structure of costs of ART in the Human Reproduction Unit of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital between 1998 and 2003. Some techniques were discontinued, while others gained importance. Technological advances and structural innovations, together with a "learning effect," modified the structure of ART-related costs.


Assuntos
Hospitais Públicos/economia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA