RESUMO
BACKGROUND: National estimates of childhood undernutrition display uncertainty; however, it is known that stunting is the most prevalent deficiency. Child undernutrition is manifest in poor communities but is a modifiable risk factor. The intention of the study was to quantify trends in the indicators of child undernutrition to aid policymakers. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the burden of diseases attributable to stunting, wasting and underweight and their aggregate effects in South African (SA) children under the age of 5 years during 2000, 2006 and 2012. METHODS: The study applied comparative risk assessment methodology. Data sources for estimates of prevalence and population distribution of exposure in children under 5 years were the National Food Consumption surveys and the SA National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted close to the target year of burden. Childhood undernutrition was estimated for stunting, wasting and underweight and their combined 'aggregate effect' using the World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 standard. Population-attributable fractions for the disease outcomes of diarrhoea, lower respiratory tract infections, measles and protein-energy malnutrition were applied to SA burden of disease estimates of deaths, years of life lost, years lived with a disability and disability-adjusted life years for 2000, 2006 and 2012. RESULTS: Among children aged under 5 years between 1999 and 2012, the distribution of anthropometric measurements <â2 standard deviations from the WHO median showed little change for stunting (28.4% v. 26.6%), wasting (2.6% v. 2.8%) and underweight (7.6% v. 6.1%). In the same age group in 2012, attributable deaths due to wasting and aggregated burden accounted for 21.4% and 33.2% of the total deaths, respectively. Attributable death rates due to wasting and aggregate effects decreased from ~310 per 100 000 in 2006 to 185 per 100 000 in 2012. CONCLUSION: The study shows that reduction of childhood undernutrition would have a substantial impact on child mortality. We need to understand why we are not penetrating the factors related to nutrition of children that will lead to reducing levels of stunting.
Assuntos
Desnutrição , Magreza , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Magreza/epidemiologia , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Transtornos do Crescimento/epidemiologia , Caquexia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Desnutrição/epidemiologiaAssuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , COVID-19 , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Vacinação em Massa , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , África do Sul/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Letter by Gopalan et al. on article by Singh and Moodley (Singh JA, Moodley K. Critical care triaging in the shadow of COVID-19: Ethics considerations. S Afr Med J 2020;110(5):355-359. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i5.14778); and response by Singh and Moodley.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Cuidados Críticos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Saúde Pública , África Austral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , Alocação de Recursos , SARS-CoV-2 , África do SulAssuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Tuberculose , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Tomada de Decisões , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Triagem , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Tuberculose/terapiaAssuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Equidade em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Administração em Saúde Pública , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , África do Sul/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To determine whether the current set of evaluation criteria used for dilute Russel Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) investigations in the routine laboratory meet expectation and identify possible shortcomings. METHODS: All dRVVT assays requested from January 2015 to December 2015 were appraised in this cross-sectional study. The raw data panels were compared with the new reference interval, established in 2016, to determine the sequence of assays that should have been performed. The interpretive comments were audited, and false-negative reports identified. Interpretive comments according to three interpretation guidelines were compared. The reagent cost per assay was determined, and reagent cost wastage, due to redundant tests, was calculated. RESULTS: Only ~9% of dRVVT results authorized during 2015 had an interpretive comment included in the report. ~15% of these results were false-negative interpretations. There is a significant statistical difference in interpretive comments between the three interpretation methods. Redundant mixing tests resulted in R 7477.91 (~11%) reagent cost wastage in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: We managed to demonstrate very evident deficiencies in our own practice and managed to establish a standardized workflow that will potentially render our service more efficient and cost effective, aiding clinicians in making improved treatment decisions and diagnoses. Furthermore, it is essential that standard operating procedures be kept up to date and executed by all staff in the laboratory.
Assuntos
Hematologia/métodos , Tempo de Protrombina/normas , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea , Estudos Transversais , Reações Falso-Negativas , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Tempo de Protrombina/economia , Fluxo de TrabalhoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We wanted to develop a valid and reliable nutritional knowledge test for urban South African adolescents who were participating in the Birth-to-Twenty cohort study. The questionnaire was intended for use every second year, from ages 13 to 14 y until age 20 y. METHODS: The initial steps involved the development of a conceptual framework and identification of nutritional concepts in collaboration with nutritional experts, and this defined the construct of the questionnaire. The South African national teaching curriculum objectives for nutritional education and other relevant issues were selected as the desired concepts, and most items were phrased in accordance with the recently developed South African Food-Based Dietary Guidelines. Thereafter, 140 items (questions) were developed and in turn assessed by an expert panel, and the result was that only 88 items remained. This was done to ensure content and face validity of the items. The 88 items were constructed into a questionnaire and piloted for appropriateness and understanding by adolescents, ages 13 to 14 y, as a means of assessing face validity by non-experts. The edited preliminary questionnaire (still with 88 items) was administered to a nutrition expert group (n = 71) versus a non-expert group (n = 82), referred to as sample 1, for the purposes of performing item analysis and assessing construct validity of the questionnaire. The result of the analysis, a 63-item questionnaire, was administered to adolescents at three school grade levels, 8 (n = 128), 10 (n = 143), and 12 (n = 98), referred to as sample 2, which was representative of the grades in which the Birth-to-Twenty group will be in when the questionnaire is administered. The questionnaire was administered to the sample to assess its content validity and internal consistency reliability. The final questionnaire had 60 items, and its construct, content, and internal consistency reliability were reassessed. RESULTS: The final 60-item questionnaire displayed a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in the mean scores of the expert and non-expert groups tested. It had internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.71, 0.79, and 0.82 for grades 8, 10, and 12 respectively, and an overall value of 0.77 for all groups combined. However, it was less than 0.7 for most grade 8 pupils and for all grades at a historically disadvantaged school. CONCLUSION: A nutritional knowledge questionnaire with construct, face, and content validities and internal consistency was developed for use in South African adolescents to evaluate their nutritional knowledge. Internal consistency was low in children at a disadvantaged school and those in grade 8 compared with multiracial groups at a multiracial school. It is recommended that pupils at disadvantaged schools be assisted by trained interviewers when taking the test.