Glucarpidase for Treating Adults with Delayed Methotrexate Elimination Due to Impaired Renal Function: An Economic Simulation Analysis.

Background: Glucarpidase is indicated for treating delayed methotrexate (MTX) elimination due to impaired renal function. Although glucarpidase is capable of rapidly eliminating MTX independent of renal clearance, its cost can be perceived as a barrier to use. However, no published economic analyses have evaluated glucarpidase relative to comparable treatments. Purpose: To assess the economic value of glucarpidase for treating adult patients in the United States (US) who experience delayed MTX elimination due to impaired renal function. Methods: A decision tree model was developed to assess the economic value of glucarpidase. The short-term inpatient management of patients as well as long-term survival were simulated. Costs associated with the use of glucarpidase were compared against other methods for treating delayed MTX elimination due to impaired renal function under two scenarios: current practice (ie, mix of timely/delayed use of glucarpidase, hemodialysis, or supportive care [SC] alone) as compared with proposed practice (ie, timely glucarpidase administration within 60 hours for all eligible patients). Hypothetical practical scenarios for US institutions were also considered. Results: For adult patients with delayed MTX elimination, proposed practice as compared to current practice was associated with an increased cost of $20,024 per patient, not considering any incremental reimbursement associated with glucarpidase administration. Importantly, early treatment with glucarpidase, within 60 hours, was shown to be less expensive per patient than delayed glucarpidase treatment or treating with hemodialysis, but more expensive than SC alone. However, proposed practice was associated with multiple clinical benefits, including shorter hospital length of stay. For hypothetical practical scenarios, minimal shifts in treatment patterns had minimal cost impacts. Conclusion: Treatment of all eligible patients with glucarpidase within 60 hours was associated with an increased cost per patient (relative to current practice) but substantial improvements in clinical outcomes. Timely glucarpidase use was less expensive than delayed glucarpidase or hemodialysis.

Validation and Application of a Low-Cost Sorting Device for Fumonisin Reduction in Maize.

Fumonisin mycotoxins are a persistent challenge to human and livestock health in tropical and sub-tropical maize cropping systems, and more efficient methods are needed to reduce their presence in food systems. We constructed a novel, low-cost device for sorting grain, the "DropSort", and tested its effectiveness on both plastic kernel models and fumonisin-contaminated maize. Sorting plastic kernels of known size and shape enabled us to optimize the sorting performance of the DropSort. The device sorted maize into three distinct fractions as measured by bulk density and 100-kernel weight. The level of fumonisin was lower in the heaviest fractions of maize compared to the unsorted samples. Based on correlations among fumonisin and bulk characteristics of each fraction, we found that light fraction 100-kernel weight could be an inexpensive proxy for unsorted fumonisin concentration. Single kernel analysis revealed significant relationships among kernel fumonisin content and physical characteristics that could prove useful for future sorting efforts. The availability of a low-cost device (materials~USD 300) that can be used to reduce fumonisin in maize could improve food safety in resource-limited contexts in which fumonisin contamination remains a pressing challenge.

Spatiotemporal assessment of post-harvest mycotoxin contamination in rural North Indian food systems.

The spatiotemporal trends in aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), fumonisin B1 (FB1), and deoxynivalenol (DON) accumulation were analyzed in a range of food commodities (maize, groundnut, pearl millet, rice, and wheat) in village settings in Unnao, Uttar Pradesh, India. Samples (n = 1549) were collected across six communities and six time points spanning a calendar year and were analyzed for mycotoxins using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. AFB1 and FB1 were common across surveyed villages, with moderate to high detection rates (45-75%) observed across commodities. AFB1 levels in maize and groundnuts and FB1 levels in maize and pearl millet frequently exceeded regulatory threshold levels of 15 µg/kg (AFB1) and 2 µg/g (FB1). DON was analyzed in wheat, with 3% of samples yielding detectable levels and none exceeding 1 µg/g. In rice, AFB1 levels were highest in the bran and husk and lower in the kernel. Commodity type significantly influenced AFB1 detection status, while commodity type, season, and visual quality influenced samples' legal status. Storage characteristics and household socioeconomic status indicators did not have significant effects on contamination. No significant effects of any variables on FB1 detection or legal status were observed. Data on mycotoxin contamination, combined with data on local dietary intake, were used to estimate spatiotemporal mycotoxin exposure profiles. Estimated seasonal per capita exposure levels for AFB1 (5.4-39.3 ng/kg body weight/day) and FB1 (~0-2.4 µg/kg body weight/day) exceeded provisional maximum tolerable daily intake levels (1 ng/kg body weight/day for AFB1 and 2 µg/kg body weight/day for FB1) in some seasons and locations. This study demonstrates substantial dietary mycotoxin exposure risk in Unnao food systems and serves as an evidentiary foundation for participatory food safety intervention in the region.

Articulating the effect of food systems innovation on the Sustainable Development Goals.

Food system innovations will be instrumental to achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, major innovation breakthroughs can trigger profound and disruptive changes, leading to simultaneous and interlinked reconfigurations of multiple parts of the global food system. The emergence of new technologies or social solutions, therefore, have very different impact profiles, with favourable consequences for some SDGs and unintended adverse side-effects for others. Stand-alone innovations seldom achieve positive outcomes over multiple sustainability dimensions. Instead, they should be embedded as part of systemic changes that facilitate the implementation of the SDGs. Emerging trade-offs need to be intentionally addressed to achieve true sustainability, particularly those involving social aspects like inequality in its many forms, social justice, and strong institutions, which remain challenging. Trade-offs with undesirable consequences are manageable through the development of well planned transition pathways, careful monitoring of key indicators, and through the implementation of transparent science targets at the local level.

Low-cost grain sorting technologies to reduce mycotoxin contamination in maize and groundnut.

The widespread contamination of foods by mycotoxins continues to be a public health hazard in sub-Saharan Africa, with maize and groundnut being major sources of contamination. This study was undertaken to assess the hypothesis that grain sorting can be used to reduce mycotoxin contamination in grain lots by removing toxic kernels. We tested a set of sorting principles and methods for reducing mycotoxin levels in maize and groundnut from a variety of genotypes and environments. We found that kernel bulk density (KBD) and 100-kernel weight (HKW) were associated with the levels of aflatoxins (AF) and fumonisins (FUM) in maize grain. A low-cost sorter prototype (the 'DropSort' device) that separated maize grain based on KBD and HKW was more effective in reducing FUM than AF. We then evaluated the effectiveness of DropSorting when combined with either size or visual sorting. Size sorting followed by DropSorting was the fastest method for reducing FUM to under 2 ppm, but was not effective in reducing AF levels in maize grain to under 20 ppb, especially for heavily AF-contaminated grain. Analysis of individual kernels showed that high -AF maize kernels had lower weight, volume, density, length, and width and higher sphericity than those with low AF. Single kernel weight was the most significant predictor of AF concentration. The DropSort excluded kernels with lower single kernel weight, volume, width, depth, and sphericity. We also found that visual sorting and bright greenish-yellow fluorescence sorting of maize single kernels were successful in separating kernels based on AF levels. For groundnut, the DropSort grouped grain based on HKW and did not significantly reduce AF concentrations, whereas size sorting and visual sorting were much more effective.

Insurance Status Predicts Survival in Women with Breast Cancer: Results of Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program in California.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program (BCCTP) Act, passed by Congress in 2000, provides time-limited coverage to uninsured breast or cervical cancer patients. We examine survival differences between BCCTP cases and insured controls. METHODS: Stage I-III breast cancer patients, covered under California's BCCTP from 2005 to 2009 (N = 6343), were 1:1 matched with California Cancer Registry controls on age, race/ethnicity, and cancer stage. Overall and disease-specific (OS and DSS) survival were compared using multivariate regression. RESULTS: BCCTP cases were more often unmarried [odds ratio (OR) 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.30-2.66], with poorly/undifferentiated tumors (OR 1.26, CI 1.13-1.40), classified as ER negative (OR 1.10, CI 1.02-1.20) and/or PR negative (OR 1.09, CI 1.01-1.17). Cases were more likely to undergo mastectomy (OR 1.13, CI 1.05-1.21) or no surgery (OR 1.64, CI 1.31-2.05) versus lumpectomy. Cases were also more likely to undergo radiation (OR 1.11, CI 1.03-1.19). Endocrine therapy rates were marginally lower in cases (OR 0.93, CI 0.86-1.00). OS and DSS were shorter in BCCTP cases on multivariate analysis (HR 1.29, CI 1.17-1.42 and HR 1.27, CI 1.14-1.42, respectively). When stratified by socioeconomic status (SES), cases had significantly shorter OS and DSS except in the lowest quintile. When stratified by stage, cases had significantly shorter OS and DSS, except for stage I. CONCLUSIONS: The BCCTP provides uninsured breast cancer patients with comprehensive and timely care. Although our results suggest that BCCTP delivers quality care, BCCTP patients have shorter survival rates, even after accounting for SES and stage differences. Further assistance to vulnerable populations is warranted, including longer duration of treatment coverage, and surveillance adhering to NCCN compliant surveillance programs.

Time to Treatment: Measuring Quality Breast Cancer Care.

BACKGROUND: To optimize breast cancer care, several organizations have crafted guidelines to define best practices for treating breast cancer. In addition to recommended therapies, 'timeliness of treatment' has been proposed as a quality metric. Our study evaluates time to surgical treatment and its effect on overall survival (OS). METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to identify women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2004 and 2012. Time from diagnosis to surgical treatment was calculated and grouped according to predetermined time intervals. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess patient and treatment factors related to OS. RESULTS: Overall, 420,792 patients initially treated with surgery were identified. Increased time to surgical treatment >12 weeks was associated with decreased OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.14, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.20]. When stratified by pathologic stage, stage I patients treated at 8 to <12 weeks (HR 1.07, 95 % CI 1.02-1.13) and >12 weeks (HR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.11-1.28), as well as stage II patients treated at >12 weeks (HR 1.16, 95 % CI 1.08-1.25), had decreased OS compared with patients treated at <4 weeks. Other variables associated with decreased survival were treatment at a community cancer program, Medicaid or Medicare insurance, Black race, increasing age, mastectomy, moderately and poorly differentiated tumor grade, increasing T and N stage, and higher Charlson Index Group. CONCLUSION: The survival benefit of expedited time to initial surgical treatment varies by stage and appears to have the greatest impact in early-stage disease. Prior to establishing standard metrics, further quantification of the impact on patient outcomes is needed.

Assessment of the Double-Staple Technique for Esophagoenteric Anastomosis in Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Reports on outcomes after double-staple technique (DST) for total and proximal gastrectomy are limited, originating mostly from Asian centers. Our objective was to examine anastomotic leak and stricture with DST for esophagoenteric anastomosis in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: A single institution review was performed for patients who underwent total/proximal gastrectomy with DST between 2006 and 2015. DST was performed using transoral anvil delivery (OrVil) with end-to-end anastomosis. Clinical characteristics and outcomes, including anastomotic leak and stricture, were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, DST was performed in 60 patients [total gastrectomy (81.7%, n = 49/60), proximal gastrectomy (10.0%, n = 6/60), and completion gastrectomy (8.3%, n = 5/60)]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 21 patients (35.0%), and 6 patients (10.0%) received external beam radiation therapy prior to completion gastrectomy. Operative approach was open (51.7%, n = 31/60), laparoscopic (43.3%, n = 26/60), or robotic (5.0%, n = 3/60). Anastomotic leak occurred in 6.7% (n = 4/60), while stricture independent of leak was identified in 19.0% (n = 11/58) of patients. Complications occurred in 38.3% (n = 23/60) of patients, of which 52% were classified as Clavien-Dindo grades III-V complications. CONCLUSION: In the largest Western series of DST for esophagoenteric anastomoses in gastric cancer surgery, our experience demonstrates that DST is safe and effective with low rates of leak and stricture.

Estimates of conditional survival in gastric cancer reveal a reduction of racial disparities with long-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: In prior analyses, conditional survival (CS) estimates for gastric cancer have weighed clinical and pathologic factors to predict prognosis at time intervals after surgery. Since racial disparities in gastric cancer outcomes were not considered, our objective was to determine whether race influences CS estimates. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry were used to identify gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative surgical intervention between 1988 and 2005. Five-year relative conditional survival (RCS) was computed for patients who survived at least 1 to 5 years after surgery. RCS was calculated by assessing observed and expected survival in an age- and race-matched standard population. Results were compared across time and racial groups (white, black, and Asian) using z test statistics. RESULTS: Of 14,067 patients, 63.8 % were white, 15.5 % black, and 20.7 % Asian. Racial disparities among groups were observed with improved survival of Asians at time point zero and improved RCS at 1 year. At 5 years following curative surgery, each racial group had increased RCS and the greatest magnitude of relative increase was observed in white and black patients (121 and 118 %, respectively). Comparison of RCS at the 5-year time point revealed a reduction of racial disparities in survival among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation shows that racial disparities in gastric cancer outcomes are pronounced at the time of curative surgery but diminish after years of survival, thus suggesting race has less influence over outcomes the longer patients survive. The reasons for reduction of racial disparities remain unclear and warrant future study.

Socioeconomic factors impact colon cancer outcomes in diverse patient populations.

PURPOSE: Cancer disparities among racial and ethnic groups are major public health concerns. Our objective was to examine the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on survival of colon cancer patients within major racial and ethnic groups. METHODS: Patients with colon adenocarcinoma from Los Angeles County (LAC) were assessed. SES was utilized as an indicator of healthcare access and categorized by tertiles (high, middle, and low). Patient characteristics were compared and survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: In our heterogeneous LAC cohort, we confirmed survival disparities. Asians had the best survival followed by Hispanics, whites, and blacks. For each stage of disease, Asians and Hispanics had better outcomes than whites and blacks. Then, we evaluated the impact of SES on survival within each racial and ethnic group. We observed significantly longer survival for high SES patients compared to middle and low SES patients for all racial/ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: While disparities across racial/ethnic groups are well-documented, our study is the first to identify socioeconomic disparities in survival for patients within the same group. These novel findings demonstrate the complex role of SES on race and ethnicity and identify the need to improve healthcare access even within select populations.

Assessment of endothelial function by non-invasive peripheral arterial tonometry predicts late cardiovascular adverse events.

AIMS: There is growing need for the identification of novel non-invasive methodologies for the identification of individuals at risk for adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. We examined whether endothelial dysfunction, as detected by non-invasive peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT), can predict late CV events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Reactive hyperaemia (RH) was induced following upper arm occlusion of systolic blood pressure in 270 outpatients (54 +/- 12 years, 48% female). The natural logarithmic scaled RH index (L_RHI) was calculated from the ratio between the digital pulse volume during RH and at baseline. The patients were followed for CV adverse events (AE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, revascularization or cardiac hospitalization) during a 7-year follow-up (inter-quartile range = 4.4-8). Cox models were used to estimate the association of EndoPAT results with AE adjusted for age. During the follow-up, AE occurred in 86 patients (31%). Seven-year AE rate was 48% in patients with L_RHI < 0.4 vs. 28% in those with L_RHI >or= 0.4 (P = 0.03). Additional univariate predictors of AE were advancing age (P = 0.02) and prior coronary bypass surgery (P = 0.01). The traditional Framingham risk score was not higher in patients with AE. Multivariate analysis identified L_RHI < 0.4 as an independent predictor of AE (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A low RH signal detected by EndoPAT, consistent with endothelial dysfunction, was associated with higher AE rate during follow-up. L_RHI was an independent predictor of AE. Non-invasive assessment of peripheral vascular function may be useful for the identification of patients at risk for cardiac AEs.

Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of prostate weight as a determinant of a high prostate margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has not been studied. METHODS: Prospective pathologic findings of 1,500 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP, 399 cases) and da Vinci prostatectomy (DVP, 1,101 cases) between December 2000 to June 2006 at City of Hope National Medical Center were evaluated. Gleason score, pathologic stage, the presence or absence of positive margins, extraprostatic tumor extension, and seminal vesicle involvement by tumor were recorded in all patients. Preoperational serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were recorded in all but 13 cases. These parameters were then correlated with prostate weight. RESULTS: Of 1,500 patients, 345 had one or more positive margins (23%). Patients with low median prostate weight (49 g) had a significantly higher positive margin rate (p < 0.0001) and incidence of extraprostatic extension by tumor (p = 0.04), and were 1.523 times more likely to have positive margins [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.167-1.985]. CONCLUSION: We conclude that low prostate weight may be a determinant of a higher recurrence rate and more aggressive disease.