Five-year audit of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH-manometry in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal function testing was developed to aid diagnosis in patients with negative endoscopy. Although combined 24-h esophageal pH-manometry is now commercially available, its routine clinical effectiveness has not yet been studied. METHODS: From 1992 to 1996 we evaluated 303 consecutive patients who were first-time referrals to our unit for 24-h esophageal pH-manometry. The referral indications were gastroesophageal reflux disease, 47.2%; dysphagia, 18.5%; non-cardiac chest pain, 14.9%; connective tissue disease, 13.2%; and symptomatic patients after antireflux surgery, 6.3%. RESULTS: Overall, esophageal function testing altered the diagnosis of 44% of the patients, confirmed it in 38%, and specifically changed the management of 66%. The final clinical 'diagnosis' was reflux disease, 54% (32% with non-specific esophageal motility disorder); connective tissue disease, 9.9%; achalasia, 9.6%; other specific esophageal motility disorders, 3.3%; non-specific esophageal motility disorders, 6.9%; and normal, 16.2%. The cost per testing was estimated to be US$305 and per change in management US$465. CONCLUSION: Combined 24-h pH-manometry has been shown to be a useful and cost-effective test for the management of selected patients in whom the primary investigation was insufficient.

Utility of abdominal sonography in patients with idiopathic deep vein thrombosis.

PURPOSE: Studies have confirmed an association between idiopathic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and malignant tumors. We assessed the usefulness of routine abdominal sonography in patients with idiopathic DVT to detect malignant tumors and other relevant findings. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed abdominal sonograms and records from 135 consecutive patients with confirmed idiopathic DVT and interviewed patients and their physicians during the follow-up period (mean, 30 months). Malignancy and other clinically relevant findings determined by sonography were tabulated, and the cost of each malignancy detected by abdominal sonography in this study was calculated. RESULTS: Malignant tumors were found in 14 patients (10%), 7 by routine abdominal sonography, 3 by other means during hospitalization, and 4 during the follow-up period. Other clinically relevant findings detected by routine abdominal sonography were found in 33 patients (24%). The estimated cost of discovering malignancy by using screening abdominal sonography was approximately US$3,000/malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal sonography was useful in detecting a variety of clinically relevant findings in addition to half of the malignant tumors found in our study.

Risk factor assessment of endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps.

BACKGROUND: Malignant colorectal polyps are defined as endoscopically removed polyps with cancerous tissue which has invaded the submucosa. Various histological criteria exist for managing these patients. AIMS: To determine the significance of histological findings of patients with malignant polyps. METHODS: Five pathologists reviewed the specimens of 85 patients initially diagnosed with malignant polyps. High risk malignant polyps were defined as having one of the following: incomplete polypectomy, a margin not clearly cancer-free, lymphatic or venous invasion, or grade III carcinoma. Adverse outcome was defined as residual cancer in a resection specimen and local or metastatic recurrence in the follow up period (mean 67 months). RESULTS: Malignant polyps were confirmed in 70 cases. In the 32 low risk malignant polyps, no adverse outcomes occurred; 16 (42%) of the 38 patients with high risk polyps had adverse outcomes (p<0.001). Independent adverse risk factors were incomplete polypectomy and a resected margin not clearly cancer-free; all other risk factors were only associated with adverse outcome when in combination. CONCLUSION: As no patients with low risk malignant polyps had adverse outcomes, polypectomy alone seems sufficient for these cases. In the high risk group, surgery is recommended when either of the two independent risk factors, incomplete polypectomy or a resection margin not clearly cancer-free, is present or if there is a combination of other risk factors. As lymphatic or venous invasion or grade III cancer did not have an adverse outcome when the sole risk factor, operations in such cases should be individually assessed on the basis of surgical risk.