Screening for poverty and related social determinants to improve knowledge of and links to resources (SPARK): development and cognitive testing of a tool for primary care.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare organizations are increasingly exploring ways to address the social determinants of health. Accurate data on social determinants is essential to identify opportunities for action to improve health outcomes, to identify patterns of inequity, and to help evaluate the impact of interventions. The objective of this study was to refine a standardized tool for the collection of social determinants data through cognitive testing. METHODS: An initial set of questions on social determinants for use in healthcare settings was developed by a collaboration of hospitals and a local public health organization in Toronto, Canada during 2011-2012. Subsequent research on how patients interpreted the questions, and how they performed in primary care and other settings led to revisions. We administered these questions and conducted in-depth cognitive interviews with all the participants, who were from Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Cognitive interviewing was used, with participants invited to verbalize thoughts and feelings as they read the questions. Interview notes were grouped thematically, and high frequency themes were addressed. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-five individuals responded to the study advertisements and 195 ultimately participated in the study. Although all interviews were conducted in English, participants were diverse. For many, the value of this information being collected in typical healthcare settings was unclear, and hence, we included descriptors for each question. In general, the questions were understood, but participants highlighted a number of ways the questions could be changed to be even clearer and more inclusive. For example, more response options were added to the question of sexual orientation and the "making ends meet" question was completely reworded in light of challenges to understand the informal phrasing cited by English as a Second Language (ESL) users of the tool. CONCLUSION: In this work we have refined an initial set of 16 sociodemographic and social needs questions into a simple yet comprehensive 18-question tool. The changes were largely related to wording, rather than content. These questions require validation against accepted, standardized tools. Further work is required to enable community data governance, and to ensure implementation of the tool as well as the use of its data is successful in a range of organizations.

An equity-based assessment of immunization-related responses in urban Alberta during the 2014 measles outbreak: a comparative analysis between Calgary and Edmonton.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) immunization rates during the measles outbreak in Calgary and Edmonton of 2014 stratified by four area-level socio-demographic indicators. This study also leverages this epidemiological data to assess the equity aspect of emergency measures instituted regarding immunization in those two cities. METHODS: A mixed-methods comparative case study analysis methodology was employed to assess the neighbourhood-level immunization statuses before (2013), during (2014), and after (2015) an active measles outbreak in Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The epidemiological one-dose by age-2 MMR coverage data were stratified using four socio-demographic indicators: median household income, %-homeownership, %-Aboriginal population, and %-immigrant population. Document and content analysis was utilized to investigate the outbreak mitigation strategies deployed in each city. RESULTS: The measles outbreak of 2013/2014 involved the entirety of Alberta and led to both provincial and city-specific interventions in which Calgary deployed three mass immunization clinics in 2014, where Edmonton did not. The Calgary coverage data showed an increase in coverage inequalities across all indicators and the Edmonton data showed mixed results in terms of equity gains/losses. Calgary's additive intervention of three mass immunization clinics in 2014 appears to have contributed to both the higher gross immunization rates in Calgary (90.77%) and an inequitable increase in coverage rates as compared with Edmonton (88.96%), in most cases. CONCLUSION: Public health policy-makers must be cognizant that large-scale public health efforts must be optimized for accessibility across all socio-economic levels to ensure public and population health gains are realized equitably.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Cette étude porte sur les taux de vaccination contre la rougeole, la rubéole et les oreillons (RRO) durant l'éclosion de rougeole de 2014 à Calgary et à Edmonton, stratifiés selon quatre indicateurs sociodémographiques régionaux. L'étude se sert aussi de ces données épidémiologiques pour évaluer l'équité des mesures de vaccination d'urgence instituées dans les deux villes. MéTHODE: À l'aide d'une analyse comparative d'études de cas à méthodes mixtes, nous avons évalué les statuts vaccinaux par quartier avant (2013), pendant (2014) et après (2015) une éclosion active de rougeole survenue à Calgary et Edmonton, en Alberta, au Canada. Les données épidémiologiques relatives à la couverture du vaccin RRO, administré en une dose avant l'âge de 2 ans, ont été stratifiées à l'aide de quatre indicateurs sociodémographiques : le revenu médian des ménages, le pourcentage d'accession à la propriété, le pourcentage de la population autochtone et le pourcentage de la population immigrante. Nous avons fait appel à l'analyse documentaire et à l'analyse de contenu pour étudier les stratégies d'atténuation de l'éclosion déployées dans chaque ville. RéSULTATS: L'éclosion de rougeole de 2013-2014 a sévi partout en Alberta et a donné lieu à des interventions à l'échelle de la province et des villes; trois cliniques de vaccination de masse ont été déployées à Calgary en 2014, mais aucune à Edmonton. Selon les données relatives à la couverture vaccinale à Calgary, il y a eu une augmentation des inégalités dans la couverture pour tous les indicateurs; selon les données pour Edmonton, les résultats en matière de gains ou de pertes d'équité ont été mitigés. L'ajout de trois cliniques de vaccination de masse à Calgary en 2014 semble avoir contribué à la fois aux taux de vaccination bruts plus élevés à Calgary (90,77 %) et à une hausse inéquitable des taux de couverture comparativement à Edmonton (88,96 %) dans la plupart des cas. CONCLUSION: Les responsables des politiques de santé publique doivent être conscients qu'il faut optimiser les efforts de santé publique à grande échelle pour que toutes les classes socioéconomiques en bénéficient, afin que les gains réalisés en santé publique et en santé des populations soient équitables.

Individual- and area-level socioeconomic inequalities in diabetes mellitus in Saskatchewan between 2007 and 2012: a cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Improving our understanding of social inequalities may improve prevention and treatment efforts for diabetes mellitus. We examined the association between individual- and area-level socioeconomic measures and physician-diagnosed diabetes in Saskatchewan over time. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we linked health administrative data with individual-level socioeconomic data from the Canadian Community Health Survey and area-level data from the 2006 Canadian census. We used general linear mixed-models regression to analyze the effect of each factor, controlling for geographic and demographic measures. RESULTS: Area-level deprivation was associated with medically diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus after adjustment for the individual-level factors of age, sex, household income and education. Individuals residing in areas ranked in the least deprived quintile had a lower likelihood of diabetes than those in the most deprived quintile (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.88). However, this disparity existed only in urban areas. This result may reflect less pronounced health inequalities in rural areas, greater socioeconomic heterogeneity, larger geographic units or some combination of these factors. INTERPRETATION: Individual- and area-level socioeconomic factors were associated with the likelihood of medically diagnosed diabetes; however, the strength of this association varied between urban and rural communities. Acknowledgement of area-level deprivation as a modifiable risk factor related to the prevalence of diabetes is important in the development of effective interventions for urban, but not rural, areas.

Quality improvement as a population health promotion opportunity to reorient the healthcare system.

BACKGROUND: A quality improvement (QI) focus in systems strategically investing resources to achieve the Quadruple Aim (i.e., better population health, lower system costs, improved patient care, and an engaged and productive workforce) presents an opportunity to reorient health services towards population health promotion. SETTING: An interdisciplinary team linked across a large regionalized healthcare system engaged in a (Saskatoon) Region-wide 90-day QI initiative focused on patient safety. INTERVENTION: The team worked directly with healthcare teams to link cultural safety, patient-centeredness, and health equity to other dimensions of healthcare quality. The team provided data from health status reports, equity analyses of healthcare utilization, and stakeholder consultations and adapted QI methods, including A3 thinking and Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycles. OUTCOMES: Throughout the 90 days, use of the terms "health equity" and "cultural safety" increased among healthcare teams and in region-wide communications. Within the year following the initiative, the Region made public and ongoing commitments to address health inequities. IMPLICATIONS: System-wide QI initiatives present opportunities to promote population health approaches, shift perspectives and language, and ultimately influence organizational culture. Learnings are relevant to health promotion practitioners attempting to engage healthcare partners, and for health systems strategically investing for improved population health.

Facilitators and barriers of sociodemographic data collection in Canadian health care settings: a multisite case study evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing awareness of the importance of social determinants of health, research remains limited about the implementation of sociodemographic data collection in Canadian health care settings. Little is known about the salient contextual factors that enable or hinder collection and use of social information to improve quality of care in clinical settings. This study examines the perceptions and experiences of managers and care providers to better understand how to support organizational efforts to collect and use sociodemographic data to provide equity-oriented care. METHODS: Case studies of three diverse urban health care settings employed semi-structured individual and group interviews with managers and care providers respectively to explore their experiences with implementation. Data was analyzed separately and in context for each site as part of an individual case study. A thematic analysis of interview transcripts was performed with an inductive approach to coding of segments of the text. Constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were used as an analytical framework to structure the data to support cross case comparisons of facilitators and barriers to implementation across settings. RESULTS: Several perceived facilitators and barriers to implementation were identified that clustered around three CFIR domains: intervention, inner setting and characteristics of individuals. Macro level (outer setting) factors were relatively unexplored. Sites were motivated by their recognition of need for social information to improve quality of care. Organizational readiness for implementation was demonstrated by priorities that reflected concern for equity in care, leadership support and commitment to an inclusive process for stakeholder engagement. Barriers included perceived relevance of only a subset of sociodemographic questions to service delivery, staff capacity and comfort with data collection as well as adequate resources (funding and time). CONCLUSION: Although system level mandates were underexplored, they may accelerate adoption and implementation of sociodemographic data collection in the presence of organizational readiness. Standardized tools integrated into information systems and workflows would support adequately trained personnel. More research is needed to understand important factors in rural health settings and with clinical application to inform care delivery pathways.

An analytic approach for describing and prioritizing health inequalities at the local level in Canada: a descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: We present the health inequalities analytic approach used by the Saskatoon Health Region to examine health equity. Our aim was to develop a method that will enable health regions to prioritize action on health inequalities. METHODS: Data from admissions to hospital, physician billing, reportable diseases, vital statistics and childhood immunizations in the city of Saskatoon were analyzed for the years ranging from 1995 to 2011. Data were aggregated to the dissemination area level. The Pampalon deprivation index was used as the measure of socioeconomic status. We calculated annual rates per 1000 people for each outcome. Rate ratios, rate differences, area-level concentration curves and area-level concentration coefficients quantified inequality. An Inequalities Prioritization Matrix was developed to prioritize action for the outcomes showing the greatest inequality. The outcomes measured were cancer, intentional self-harm, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mental illness, heart disease, diabetes, injury, stroke, chlamydia, tuberculosis, gonorrhea, hepatitis C, high birth weight, low birth weight, teen abortion, teen pregnancy, infant mortality and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: According to the Inequalities Prioritization Matrix, injuries and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were the first and second priorities, respectively, that needed to be addressed related to inequalities in admissions to hospital. For physician billing, mental disorders and diabetes were high-priority areas. Differences in teen pregnancy and all-cause mortality were the most unequal in the vital statistics data. For communicable diseases, hepatitis C was the highest priority. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that health inequalities exist at the local level and that a method can be developed to prioritize action on these inequalities. Policies should consider health inequalities and adopt population-based and targeted actions to reduce inequalities.

The population health approach: A qualitative study of conceptual and operational definitions for leaders in Canadian healthcare.

OBJECTIVES: The population health approach is increasingly recognized for its role in health system reform; however, its broad scope and definition have been criticized for being a barrier to clear communication. This qualitative study examined the way senior healthcare leaders in Canada conceptualize and operationalize the population health approach in planning and decision-making. FINDINGS: Core elements of the population health approach included focusing on health and wellness rather than illness, taking a population rather than individual orientation, understanding needs and solutions through community outreach, addressing health disparities/health in vulnerable groups, addressing the social determinants of health and inter-sectoral action and partnerships. CONCLUSION: The population health approach is increasingly recognized for its role in reducing healthcare demand and contributing to health system sustainability. This study demonstrated the growing need to clarify terminology among multiform partners to establish a foundation for future healthcare integration and inter-sectoral action.

Coverage for the entire population: tackling immunization rates and disparities in Saskatoon Health Region.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of an intervention, the Immunization Reminders Project, in terms of a) improving vaccination coverage rates for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) among 2-year-olds and b) ameliorating geographical disparities in early childhood immunization coverage. TARGET POPULATION: All 14-month-old and 20-month-old children in Saskatoon Health Region who were overdue for their immunizations. SETTING: Saskatoon Health Region (SHR). INTERVENTION: The intervention involved calling the parents/caregivers of the children in the target population with a reminder about immunizations. After five telephone calls and if the parent/caregiver could not be reached, a letter was mailed to the last known address. If there was no response to the letter, a reminder home visit was attempted for families residing in the low-income neighbourhoods in Saskatoon. Since January 2009, all reminders for families not residing in the low-income neighbourhoods in Saskatoon are made through mailed letters. OUTCOMES: After the introduction of the Immunization Reminders Project, coverage rates among 2-year-olds for MMR increased significantly overall and in most geographical areas examined. Disparities between geographical subgroups appeared to be declining, but not significantly. CONCLUSION: A universal approach to early childhood immunization can likely contribute to increases in coverage rates, but there is still room for improvement in SHR. These findings have prompted additional practice and policy changes.

Suicidal ideation: the role of economic and aboriginal cultural status after multivariate adjustment.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if Aboriginal (in this paper, First Nations and Métis people) cultural status is independently associated with lifetime suicidal ideation in the Saskatoon Health Region after controlling for other covariates, particularly income status. METHODS: Data collected by Statistics Canada in all 3 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were merged with identical questions asked in February 2007 by the Saskatoon Health Region. The health outcome was lifetime suicidal ideation. The risk indicators included demographics, socioeconomic status, cultural status, behaviours, life stress, health care use, and other health problems. RESULTS: Participants (n = 5948) completed the survey with a response rate of 81.1%. The prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation was 11.9%. After stratification, it was found that high-income Aboriginal people have similar low levels of suicidal ideation, compared with high-income Caucasian people. The risk-hazard model demonstrated a larger independent effect of income status in explaining the association between Aboriginal cultural status and lifetime suicidal ideation, compared with the independent effect of age. After full multivariate adjustment, Aboriginal cultural status had a substantially reduced association with lifetime suicidal ideation. The odds of lifetime suicidal ideation for Aboriginal people reduced from 3.28 to 1.99 after multivariate adjustment for household income alone. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest reductions in lifetime suicidal ideation can be observed in Aboriginal people in Canada by adjusting levels of household income.

High health care utilization and costs associated with lower socio-economic status: results from a linked dataset.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper was to use a linked dataset to compare health care utilization rates and costs between income groups in Saskatoon, Canada. METHODS: The Canadian Community Health Survey was linked to hospital, physician and medication data in Saskatoon. RESULTS: Of 3,688 eligible participants, 3,433 agreed to the health survey and data linkage with health records (83.7% overall response). Low-income residents were 27-33% more likely to be hospitalized and 36-45% more likely to receive a medication than middle- and higher-income residents, but were 5-7% less likely to visit a physician over a one-year period. In comparison to middle-income residents, low-income residents had 56% more high users of hospitals, 166% more high users of physicians and 90% more high users of medications. Low-income residents had 34-35% higher health care costs overall than middle- and high-income residents. After multivariate adjustment for increased disease prevalence, low income had a reduced association with high health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that residents with lower income are responsible for disproportionate usage of hospitals, physicians and medications; due mainly (but not entirely) to higher disease prevalence.

Daily smoking in Saskatoon: the independent effect of income and cultural status.

OBJECTIVE: Smoking prevalence in the Saskatoon Health Region (SHR) went from 23.9% in 2003 to 23.3% in 2005 to 26.2% in 2007. The prevalence of smoking within the SHR Aboriginal population is substantially higher than the rest of the population. The purpose of the current study was to determine the independent effects of Aboriginal cultural status and income status on daily smoking status. METHODS: Data from three cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2001, 2003, 2005) were merged with identical data collected by the SHR in 2007. All four cycles were random telephone survey samples. RESULTS: 5948 participants (81.1% response rate) completed the survey. After cross-tabulation, Aboriginal cultural status and income were strongly associated with daily smoking status. Using logistic regression, the odds of daily smoking for residents of Aboriginal cultural status was reduced substantially from the initial odds of 3.43 to 2.26 after adjusting for income alone, and reduced further to 1.57 after full multivariate adjustment. CONCLUSION: Given the association between smoking status and income status, future policies to reduce smoking prevalence should include generic policies to reduce income disparity as well as targeted strategies to improve the social conditions of Aboriginal people.

The role of economic and cultural status as risk indicators for alcohol and marijuana use among adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: A number of reports suggest that Aboriginal cultural status is a major risk indicator for drug and alcohol use. The primary purpose of the present paper was to determine whether Aboriginal cultural status is independently associated with risk behaviours, such as marijuana use and alcohol abuse, among youth after multivariate adjustment for other factors, such as socioeconomic status. METHODS: Every student between grades 5 and 8 in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, was asked to complete a questionnaire in February 2007. Logistic regression was used to determine the independent risk indicators associated with alcohol abuse and marijuana use. RESULTS: Four thousand ninety-three youth participated in the school health survey. At the cross-tabulation level, cultural status and neighbourhood income were both strongly associated with alcohol and marijuana use. After multivariate adjustment, the association between Aboriginal cultural status and alcohol abuse was not statistically significant (crude OR=3.52 to adjusted OR=0.80). For marijuana use, the association was significantly reduced (crude OR=9.91 to adjusted OR=2.79). After controlling for all other variables, results showed that low-income youth were 103% more likely to get drunk at least once and were 163% more likely to have tried marijuana at least once. CONCLUSION: To be more successful, future policies directed toward reducing risk behaviours among youth should consider neighbourhood income characteristics.

A meta-analysis of marijuana and alcohol use by socio-economic status in adolescents aged 10-15 years.

OBJECTIVES: A majority of population-based studies suggest prevalence of drug and alcohol risk behaviour increases during late adolescence to early adulthood. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to clarify if socio-economic status (SES) is a determinant of marijuana and alcohol risk behaviour in adolescents between the ages of 10-15 years. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to identify published or unpublished papers between January 1, 1980 and February 9, 2007 that reviewed marijuana and alcohol risk behaviour by SES in adolescents aged 10-15 years. SYNTHESIS: We found nine studies that fulfilled our inclusion criteria and passed the methodological quality review. The prevalence of marijuana and alcohol risk behaviour was 22% higher (RR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.14-1.31) in adolescents with low SES in comparison to adolescents with higher SES. Stratification by country of origin revealed that American and New Zealand studies had statistically significant variability in the reported effects as compared to European and UK studies. DISCUSSION: The evidence suggests that low SES has an inverse association with the prevalence of marijuana and alcohol risk behaviour in adolescents between the ages of 10-15 years. Higher rates of marijuana and alcohol risk behaviour among lower SES adolescents may impact emotional development, limit future educational and occupational achievement, and increase the likelihood for adult marijuana and alcohol addiction. CONCLUSION: Lower SES adolescents have higher rates of marijuana and alcohol risk behaviour than higher SES adolescents.

A systematic review of depressed mood and anxiety by SES in youth aged 10-15 years.

OBJECTIVES: A majority of population-based studies suggest prevalence of depressed mood and anxiety is most common during late adolescence to early adulthood. Mental health status has been linked previously to socio-economic status in adults. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to clarify if socio-economic status (SES) is a risk indicator of depressed mood or anxiety in youth between the ages of 10 to 15 years old. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review to identify published or unpublished papers between January 1, 1980 and October 31, 2006 that reviewed depressed mood or anxiety by SES in youth aged 10-15 years. SYNTHESIS: We found nine studies that fulfilled our inclusion criteria and passed the methodological quality review. The prevalence of depressed mood or anxiety was 2.49 times higher (95% CI 2.33-2.67) in youth with low SES in comparison to youth with higher SES. DISCUSSION: The evidence suggests that low SES has an inverse association with the prevalence of depressed mood and anxiety in youth between the ages of 10 to 15 years old. Higher rates of depressed mood and anxiety among lower socio-economic status youth may impact emotional development and limit future educational and occupational achievement. CONCLUSION: Lower socio-economic status is associated with higher rates of depressed mood and anxiety in youth.

Risk indicators for depressed mood in youth: Limited association with Aboriginal cultural status.

INTRODUCTION: There have been too few studies on urban Aboriginal youth to permit inferences about depressed mood in this subgroup. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether Aboriginal cultural status is independently associated with moderate or severe depressed mood in youth after controlling for other covariates, including socioeconomic status. METHODS: Every student between grades 5 and 8 in the city of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, was asked to complete a questionnaire in February of 2007. Depressed mood was measured with a 12-question depression scale derivative of the 20-question Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. RESULTS: Four thousand ninety-three youth participated in the school health survey. For Aboriginal youth, the prevalence rate of moderate or severe depressed mood was 21.6% in comparison with 8.9% for Caucasian youth (rate ratio 2.43; 95% CI 1.92 to 3.08). Aboriginal cultural status was not associated with depressed mood after adjustment for other covariates in the final multivariate model (OR 1.132; 95% CI 0.682 to 1.881). Parental educational status and sex were confounders to the association between Aboriginal cultural status and depressed mood. CONCLUSIONS: The recognition that Aboriginal cultural status is not independently associated with moderate or severe depressed mood in youth after full multivariate adjustment allows policy makers to acknowledge that mental health disparity prevention is possible because the determinants of health (ie, education) are modifiable (in comparison with Aboriginal cultural status).

Disparity in childhood immunizations.

BACKGROUND: Incomplete immunization coverage is common in low-income families and Aboriginal children in Canada. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether child immunization coverage rates at two years of age were lower in low-income neighbourhoods of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. METHODS: Parents who were and were not behind in child immunization coverage were contacted to determine differences in knowledge, beliefs and opinions on barriers and solutions. A multivariate regression model was designed to determine whether Aboriginal cultural status was associated with being behind in childhood immunizations after controlling for low-income status. RESULTS: Reviewing the past five years in Saskatoon, the six low-income neighbourhoods had complete child immunization coverage rates of 43.7% (95% CI 41.2 to 45.9) for measles-mumps-rubella, and 42.6% (95% CI 40.1 to 45.1) for diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type B. The five affluent neighbourhoods had 90.6% (95% CI 88.9 to 92.3) immunization coverage rates for measles-mumps-rubella, and 78.6% (95% CI 76.2 to 81.0) for diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio and H influenzae type B. Parents who were behind in immunization coverage for their children were more likely to be single, of Aboriginal or other (non-Caucasian or non-Aboriginal) cultural status, have lower family income and have significant differences in reported beliefs, barriers and potential solutions. In the final regression model, Aboriginal cultural status was no longer associated with lower immunization status. INTERPRETATION: Child immunization coverage rates in Saskatoon's six low-income neighbourhoods were approximately one-half the rate of the affluent neighbourhoods. The covariates with the strongest independent association with complete childhood immunization status were low income and other cultural status. Aboriginal cultural status was not associated with low child immunization rates after controlling for income status.

Health disparity knowledge and support for intervention in Saskatoon.

BACKGROUND: A number of reports suggest that we need to determine public understanding about the broad determinants of health and also determine public support for actions to reduce health disparities in Canada. METHODS: A cross-sectional random survey of 5,000 Saskatoon residents was used to determine knowledge about health determinants and health disparity and then determine public support for various interventions to address health disparity. FINDINGS: Saskatoon residents understand most of the determinants of health except they understate the importance of social class and gender. Saskatoon residents do not have a good understanding of the magnitude of health disparity between income groups. A majority believe risk behaviours are mostly individual choices and are not associated with income status. Most residents believe even small differences in health status between income groups is unacceptable and a majority believe that something can be done to address health disparity by income status. Interventions proposed by residents to alleviate health disparity were evidence-based, including work-earning supplements and strengthening early intervention programs. Logistic regression revealed that greatest support for transferring money from health care treatment to health creation services (like affordable housing and education) came from young Aboriginal males with low income. INTERPRETATION: Saskatoon residents have knowledge of health determinants and have a strong desire to support health disparity intervention. More knowledge transfer is required on the magnitude of health disparity based on income status. Broad-based health disparity intervention in Saskatoon appears possible.