Assessment of extremely premature lambs supported by the Extrauterine Environment for Neonatal Development (EXTEND).

BACKGROUND: Our team has previously reported physiologic support by the EXTra-uterine Environment for Neonatal Development (EXTEND) of 105 to 117 days gestational age (GA) lambs for up to 28 days with normal organ maturation. However, the fetal lamb brain matures more rapidly, requiring the study of 90-105 day GA fetal lambs to assess more neurodevelopmentally equivalent lambs to the 23-25 week GA extreme premature infant. METHODS: Extremely preterm lambs (90-95 days of GA) were delivered by C-section and supported by EXTEND. Estimated circuit flows were maintained at around 325 ml/kg/min. After support on EXTEND, MRI and histopathologic analysis were performed and compared to 105-112 days GA control lambs. RESULTS: The extremely preterm group includes 10 animals with a mean GA of 91.6 days, a mean weight at cannulation of 0.98 kg and a mean length of stay on EXTEND of 13.5 days (10-21 days). Hemodynamics and oxygenation showed stable parameters. Animals showed growth and physiologic cardiac function. MRI volumetric and diffusion analysis was comparable to controls. Histologic brain analysis revealed no difference between study groups. CONCLUSION: EXTEND appears to support brain and cardiac development in an earlier gestation, less mature, lamb model. IMPACT: Prolonged (up to 21 days) physiological support of extremely preterm lambs of closer neurodevelopmental equivalence to the 24-28 gestational week human was achieved using the EXTEND system. EXTEND treatment supported brain growth and development in extremely preterm fetal lambs and was not associated with intraventricular hemorrhage or white matter injury. Daily echocardiography demonstrated physiologic heart function, absence of cardiac afterload, and normal developmental increase in cardiac chamber dimensions. This study demonstrates hemodynamic and metabolic support by the EXTEND system in the extremely preterm ovine model.

Protocol of a 12-week eHealth programme designed to reduce concerns about falling in community-living older people: Own Your Balance randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Concerns about falling (CaF) are common in older people and have been associated with avoidance of activities of daily life. Exercise designed to prevent falls can reduce CaF, but the effects are usually short-lived. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) can reduce CaF for longer but is not readily available in the community and unlikely to prevent falls. A multidomain intervention that combines CBT, motivational interviewing and exercise could be the long-term solution to treat CaF and reduce falls in older people with CaF. This paper describes the design of a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of two different 12 week self-managed eHealth programmes to reduce CaF compared with an active control. METHODS: A total of 246 participants (82 per group) aged 65 and over, with substantial concerns about falls or balance will be recruited from the community. They will be randomised into: (1) myCompass-Own Your Balance (OYB) (online CBT programme) intervention or (2) myCompass-OYB plus StandingTall intervention (an eHealth balance exercise programme), both including motivational interviewing and online health education or (3) an active control group (online health education alone). The primary outcome is change in CaF over 12 months from baseline of both intervention groups compared with control. The secondary outcomes at 2, 6 and 12 months include balance confidence, physical activity, habitual daily activity, enjoyment of physical activity, social activity, exercise self-efficacy, rate of falls, falls health literacy, mood, psychological well-being, quality of life, exercise self-efficacy, programme adherence, healthcare use, user experience and attitudes towards the programme. An intention-to-treat analysis will be applied. The healthcare funder's perspective will be adopted for the economic evaluation if appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2019/ETH12840). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, local and international conferences, community events and media releases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000440820.

Exploring the Usability of a Community Resiliency Model Approach in a High Need/Low Resourced Traumatized Community.

This study tested the usability of a non-stigmatizing community-based trauma intervention delivered by trained community members. The Community Resiliency Model (CRM) was taught to a high-crime, low-income community designated as a Mental Health Provider Shortage Area (19 MPSA score). Five groups of Latino, African-American, LGBTQ, Asian Pacific Islander, and Veteran participants (N-57) with a history of complex/cumulative traumas and untreated posttraumatic stress undertook a five-day 40-h CRM training with master trainers. Measures included Treatment Relevance, Use and Satisfaction (TRUSS), Brief CRM Questionnaire (Brief CRM), and Symptom Questionnaire (SQ). Participant preparedness to teach CRM to others was high (98%) and sustained at the 3-6 months follow-up with 93% reporting a daily use. Pre-to post comparison analyses showed a significant decrease in distress indicators and increase in wellbeing indicators. CRM's high usability holds promise for a broader, low cost and sustainable implementation in traumatized and under-resourced communities.