Use of endoscopic assessment of gastric atrophy for gastric cancer risk stratification to reduce the need for gastric mapping.

Background/Aims: Stratification for gastric cancer risk typically involves histologic grading of gastric biopsies. This study aimed to compare endoscopic assessment of gastric atrophy and histologic gastric mapping for gastric cancer risk stratification in a region with relatively high risk of gastric cancer.Methods: Endoscopic and histologic gastric cancer risk stratification were compared in Vietnamese patients with functional dyspepsia. Endoscopic gastric atrophy was graded according to the Kimura-Takemoto classification. High-risk histologic lesions were defined as gastric dysplasia, Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) gastritis stage III/IV, intestinal metaplasia in both the antrum and the corpus or incomplete intestinal subtype at any site. Two experienced pathologists, blinded to endoscopic information, jointly examined all specimens and reached a consensus. The presence of high-risk histologic lesions was compared among patients with different endoscopic grades of gastric atrophy.Results: There were 280 subjects (mean age, 46.1 ± 10 years, and male, 50%). The numbers of patients with moderate/severe grade of endoscopic gastric atrophy and high-risk histologic lesions were 126 (45.0%) and 46 (16.4%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of moderate/severe endoscopic atrophic grade for detecting high-risk histologic lesions were 93% (95% CI 86%-100%), 65% (95% CI 58%-71%), 2.64 (95% CI 2.18 - 3.18) and 0.10 (95% CI 0.03 - 0.30), respectively.Conclusions: Gastric cancer risk assessment using endoscopic or histologic methods provided similar results such that the absence or a mild grade of endoscopic gastric atrophy would preclude the need for histologic mapping.

The severity of endoscopic gastric atrophy could help to predict Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment gastritis stage.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the role of moderate-to-severe endoscopic gastric atrophy (EGA) on predicting Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) gastritis stage, and to assess the association of high-stage OLGA gastritis with gastric neoplasia in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 280 dyspeptic outpatients. EGA was assessed according to the Kimura-Takemoto classification. Gastritis stage was established according to the OLGA staging system and gastric neoplasia was assessed according to the Vienna classification. The pathologists who read the specimens were kept blind to the endoscopic results. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 46.1 years (range 20-78 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1. High-stage gastritis (e.g. stage III or IV) was confirmed in 13 (4.6%) patients. All of these patients were more than 40 years-of-age (P = 0.01), had Helicobacter pylori infection (P = 0.0006) and moderate-to-severe EGA (P < 0.001). Low-grade dysplasia was found in seven patients: 4/13 (30.7%) with high-stage gastritis versus 3/267 (1.1%) with low-stage gastritis (P < 0.001). Six of these patients had moderate-to-severe EGA (P = 0.048). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of this endoscopic finding in high-stage gastritis diagnosis were 100%, 57.7%, 10.3% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OLGA high-stage gastritis was associated with gastric dysplasia and was mostly diagnosed in patients with moderate-to-severe EGA. The absence of this endoscopic finding could effectively rule out the possibility of having high-stage gastritis.