The application of sediment quality guidelines and toxicity assessment to identify contaminant hotspots in an urbanised West Australian estuary.

This paper presents a tiered assessment approach that enabled identification, triage, interrogation and confirmation of significantly contaminated areas of an urbanised West Australian estuary. The spatial distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and bioavailable metals was determined in surficial sediments of the Swan-Canning Estuary through broad-scale screening (500 cores, 100 composite samples, 20 locations). The application of sediment quality guideline values (SQGVs) enabled ranking of locations through risk-based scoring and identification of contaminant hotspots. Subsequent targeted ecotoxicological and chemical assessment was undertaken at the highest scoring location in each tributary (80 cores, 16 composite samples, 3 locations, 16 sites). In the Canning tributary, Bull Creek sediments demonstrated the highest metal concentrations and greatest number of SQGVs exceeded. High-level toxicity was experienced in copepods and moderate toxicity in mussels (test sensitivity: copepod>mussel>amphipod). Toxicity-inducing contamination was attributable to two stormwater outfalls and limited to 300 m from points of discharge. In the Swan tributary, Claisebrook sediments demonstrated the highest concentrations of all PAHs, most OCPs and metals and the greatest number of SQGVs exceeded. High-level toxicity was reported in fish and mussels and moderate toxicity in copepods and amphipods (test sensitivity: fish>mussel>amphipod>copepod). Toxicity-inducing contamination included a stretch of estuary >1 km long, and two stormwater outfalls in the area were likely sources. The distribution and nature of PAH contamination suggested an additional source at Claisebrook. This combined chemistry and biological effects dataset provides critical information for the management of planned major development and concomitant estuary-bed disturbance in the coming decade.

An assessment of endocrine activity in Australian rivers using chemical and in vitro analyses.

Studies on endocrine disruption in Australia have mainly focused on wastewater effluents. Limited knowledge exists regarding the relative contribution of different potential sources of endocrine active compounds (EACs) to the aquatic environment (e.g., pesticide run-off, animal farming operations, urban stormwater, industrial inputs). In this study, 73 river sites across mainland Australia were sampled quarterly for 1 year. Concentrations of 14 known EACs including natural and synthetic hormones and industrial compounds were quantified by chemical analysis. EACs were detected in 88 % of samples (250 of 285) with limits of quantification (LOQ) ranging from 0.05 to 20 ng/l. Bisphenol A (BPA; LOQ = 20 ng/l) was the most frequently detected EAC (66 %) and its predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) was exceeded 24 times. The most common hormone was estrone, detected in 28 % of samples (LOQ = 1 ng/l), and the PNEC was also exceeded 24 times. 17α-Ethinylestradiol (LOQ = 0.05 ng/l) was detected in 10 % of samples at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.17 ng/l. It was detected in many samples with no wastewater influence, and the PNEC was exceeded 13 times. In parallel to the chemical analysis, endocrine activity was assessed using a battery of CALUX bioassays. Estrogenic activity was detected in 19 % (53 of 285) of samples (LOQ = 0.1 ng/l 17ß-estradiol equivalent; EEQ). Seven samples exhibited estrogenic activity (1-6.5 ng/l EEQ) greater than the PNEC for 17ß-estradiol. Anti-progestagenic activity was detected in 16 % of samples (LOQ = 8 ng/l mifepristone equivalents; MifEQ), but the causative compounds are unknown. With several compounds and endocrine activity exceeding PNEC values, there is potential risk to the Australian freshwater ecosystems.

Assessment of wastewater and recycled water quality: a comparison of lines of evidence from in vitro, in vivo and chemical analyses.

We investigated water quality at an advanced water reclamation plant and three conventional wastewater treatment plants using an "ecotoxicity toolbox" consisting of three complementary analyses (chemical analysis, in vitro bioanalysis and in situ biological monitoring), with a focus on endocrine disruption. The in vitro bioassays were chosen to provide an appropriately wide coverage of biological effects relevant to managed aquifer recharge and environmental discharge of treated wastewater, and included bioassays for bacterial toxicity (Microtox), genotoxicity (umuC), photosynthesis inhibition (Max-I-PAM) and endocrine effects (E-SCREEN and AR-CALUX). Chemical analysis of hormones and pesticides using LCMSMS was performed in parallel to correlate standard analytical methods with the in vitro assessment. For two plants with surface water discharge into open drains, further field work was carried out to examine in situ effects using mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) as a bioindicator species for possible endocrine effects. The results show considerable cytotoxicity, phytotoxicity, estrogenicity and androgenicity in raw sewage, all of which were significantly reduced by conventional wastewater treatment. No biological response was detected to RO water, suggesting that reverse osmosis is a significant barrier to biologically active compounds. Chemical analysis and in situ monitoring revealed trends consistent with the in vitro results: chemical analysis confirmed the removal trends observed by the bioanalytical tools, and in situ sampling did not reveal any evidence of endocrine disruption specifically due to discharge of treated wastewater (although other sources may be present). Biomarkers of exposure (in vitro) and effect (in vivo or in situ) are complementary and together provide information with a high level of ecological relevance. This study illustrates the utility of combining multiple lines of evidence in the assessment of water quality.