Importance of external quality assessment for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Antigen testing has become an essential part of fighting the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. With the continual increase in available tests, independent and extensive comparative evaluations using data from external quality assessment (EQA) studies to evaluate test performance between different users are required. OBJECTIVES: An EQA scheme was established to assess the sensitivity of antigen tests and the potential impact of circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains on their performance. STUDY DESIGN: Panels were prepared for three challenges in 2021 containing inactivated SARS-CoV-2-positive samples of various genetic strains (including variants of concern, VOCs) at different concentrations, and negative samples. Data was analysed based on qualitative testing results in relation to the antigen test used. RESULTS: Participants registered for each individual challenge in any combination. In total, 258 respondents from 27 countries worldwide were counted submitting 472 datasets. All core samples were correctly reported by 76.7 to 83.1% at participant level and by 73.5 to 83.8% at dataset level. Sensitivity differences could be shown in viral loads and SARS-CoV-2 strains/variants including the impact on performance by a B.1.1.7-like mutant strain with a deletion in the nucleoprotein gene. Lateral flow rapid antigen tests showed a higher rate of false negatives in general compared with automated point-of-care tests and laboratory ELISA/immunoassays. CONCLUSIONS: EQA schemes can provide valuable data to inform participants about weaknesses in their testing process or methods and support ongoing assay evaluations for regulatory approval or post-market surveillance.

Assessment of Viral Targeted Sequence Capture Using Nanopore Sequencing Directly from Clinical Samples.

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMg) enables the simultaneous detection and characterization of viruses in human, animal and environmental samples. However, lack of sensitivity still poses a challenge and may lead to poor detection and data acquisition for detailed analysis. To improve sensitivity, we assessed a broad scope targeted sequence capture (TSC) panel (ViroCap) in both human and animal samples. Moreover, we adjusted TSC for the Oxford Nanopore MinION and compared the performance to an SMg approach. TSC on the Illumina NextSeq served as the gold standard. Overall, TSC increased the viral read count significantly in challenging human samples, with the highest genome coverage achieved using the TSC on the MinION. TSC also improved the genome coverage and sequencing depth in clinically relevant viruses in the animal samples, such as influenza A virus. However, SMg was shown to be adequate for characterizing a highly diverse animal virome. TSC on the MinION was comparable to the NextSeq and can provide a valuable alternative, offering longer reads, portability and lower initial cost. Developing new viral enrichment approaches to detect and characterize significant human and animal viruses is essential for the One Health Initiative.

International external quality assessment for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection and survey on clinical laboratory preparedness during the COVID-19 pandemic, April/May 2020.

Laboratory preparedness with quality-assured diagnostic assays is essential for controlling the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. We conducted an external quality assessment study with inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) samples to support clinical laboratories with a proficiency testing option for molecular assays. To analyse SARS-CoV-2 testing performance, we used an online questionnaire developed for the European Union project RECOVER to assess molecular testing capacities in clinical diagnostic laboratories.

A real time genotyping PCR assay for polyomavirus BK.

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus BK (BKV) may cause nephropathy in renal transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis in bone marrow recipients. We developed real-time PCRs (RT-PCR) to determine easily and rapidly the different BKV genotypes (BKGT) (I-IV). METHODS: On the VP1 gene a duplex of RT-PCRs was developed and validated to differentiate the four main BKGT. 212 BKV positive samples (21 plasma, 191 urine) were tested with these specific PCRs. Of these 212 samples, 55 PCR results were additionally confirmed by sequencing a VP1 gene fragment (nucleotide 1630-1956). RESULTS: For every genotype, a highly specific, precise and internally controlled assay was developed with a limit of detection of log 3 copies per ml. In 18 (8.5%) of these samples genotyping was not successful due to a low viral load. By sequence analysis, the genotype of 46 out of 55 and 2 out of 4 samples with double infection could be confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes RT-PCRs for detection of the main BKGT. It proved to be rapid, cheap and sensitive compared to sequencing. Double infections can also be detected. This method will be of value to investigate the role of BKV infection in relation to the genotype.

An international external quality assessment of nucleic acid amplification of herpes simplex virus.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing awareness of the need for external quality control of diagnostic virology. OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT) of herpes simplex within Europe. STUDY DESIGN: Herpes simplex virus (HSV) proficiency panels were produced at the Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control on behalf of the European Union Concerted Action for Quality Control of Nucleic Acid Amplification in 1999 and 2000. Nine reference laboratories evaluated the production process. Each panel consisted of 12 coded samples with various concentrations of inactivated, freeze-dried HSV type 1 (HSV-1), and HSV type 2 (HSV-2), or negative controls. Positive samples included HSV-1 and HSV-2 in a range of concentrations (2 x 10(2) to 2 x 10(7) genome copies per ml) similar to those found in cerebrospinal fluids from patients with HSV encephalitis. RESULTS: Sixty-six participants reported a total of 76 data sets for panel 1, and 71 reported 78 data sets for panel 2. The majority of the participants employed qualitative 'in-house' polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, either in a single, nested or semi-nested format. For panel 2, 9 laboratories reported use of 'real-time' PCR in contrast to 3 for panel 1. Three laboratories submitted quantitative results on both panels. Thirty percent of the data sets had correct results for the entire panel 1. In 6 data sets (8%) a total of 11 false positive results were reported. For panel 2, 28% of the data sets had correct result. Nineteen false positive results were reported in 14 data sets (18%), but most of the incorrect results reflected a lack of test sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively high frequency of false positive results and the large number of false-negative results, albeit at low copy number, stress the need for improvement in the quality of HSV NAT and for external quality control programmes.