Assessment of button-type jejunostomy for nutritional management after esophagectomy in 201 cases.

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons preferably place a trans-nasal feeding tube or a feeding enterostomy for post-operative nutritional management after esophagectomy. Various types of tubes (such as nasogastric, transgastric, transduodenal, or transjejunal tubes) have been used for enteral feeding; however, the appropriate enteral feeding routes have not yet been proposed. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of button-type jejunostomy. METHODS: We reviewed 201 patients who underwent esophagectomy with placement of a button-type jejunostomy at the Jikei University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) between 2008 and 2019. The analyzed variables included clinicopathological characteristics, operative data, jejunostomy-related characteristics, and postoperative complications. Postoperative bodyweight loss was examined 6 months and 1 year after the operation. RESULTS: Refractory enterocutaneous fistula and bowel obstruction occurred in 13 (6.5%) and 14 (7.0%) patients, respectively. The body mass index at button-type jejunostomy removal was significantly lower and the duration of button-type jejunostomy placement was significantly longer in patients with a refractory enterocutaneous fistula (p = 0.023 and p < 0.001, respectively). Bowel obstruction was significantly more likely to develop in patients with a non-squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.021) and in patients who underwent open abdominal procedures (p < 0.001). After 1 year, the median bodyweight losses were 12.1% and 15.6% in patients with short and long jejunostomy placement durations (p = 0.642), respectively. CONCLUSION: A button-type jejunostomy is durable and allows easy self-management for maintaining the bodyweight without any adverse events. However, it is strongly recommended that the button be removed within a year to prevent refractory enterocutaneous fistula formation.

Quantitative Assessment of Blood Flow in the Gastric Conduit With Thermal Imaging for Esophageal Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The study's primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of thermal imaging (TI) and its secondary aim was to compare TI and indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography, with respect to the evaluation of the viability of the gastric conduit. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal method for evaluating perfusion in the gastric conduit for esophageal reconstruction has not been established. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected data of 263 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. TI was used in all patients. ICG fluorescence was concomitantly used in 24 patients to aid comparison with TI. A cut-off value of the anastomotic viability index (AVI) was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve in TI. RESULTS: Anastomotic leak was significantly less common in patients with AVI > 0.61 compared with those with AVI ≤ 0.61 (2% vs 28%, P< 0.001). Microvascular augmentation was performed in 20 patients with a low AVI score and/or preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Overall ability was comparable between TI and ICG fluorescence regarding the qualitative evaluation of the gastric conduit. However, TI was superior in the quantitative assessment of viability. CONCLUSIONS: TI could delineate the area of good perfusion in the gastric conduit for esophageal reconstruction, which can help identify patients at high risk of anastomotic leak.

Intraoperative thermal imaging in esophageal replacement: its use in the assessment of gastric tube viability.

We examined the use of intraoperative thermal imaging to assess the gastric vascularization and gastric tube viability during esophagectomy. The surface temperatures of the intact stomach, devascularized stomach, and gastric tube were measured in 13 patients from the proximal end to the pylorus longitudinally along the greater curvature or along the entire gastric tube during esophagectomy. Thermal images clearly demonstrated a surface temperature decline in the proximal region of the gastric tube. The mean decline rate in the surface temperature in the proximal region of the gastric tube in comparison to the intact stomach was 17.7% (P < 0.001). One patient who developed gastric tube necrosis exhibited a prominent drop in the surface temperature in the proximal region of 20.6% in comparison to that in the distal region, compared to that of 12.5% in other patients. Intraoperative thermal imaging is a noninvasive and reliable technique for the assessment of the gastric tube viability.