Combined Associations of Body Mass Index and Metabolic Health Status on Medical and Dental Care Days and Costs in Japanese Male Employees: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: The combined associations of body mass index (BMI) levels and metabolic dysfunction with medical and dental care utilizations is unclear. METHODS: A 4-year follow-up study was performed in 16,386 Japanese male employees (mean age 48.2 [standard deviation, 11.0] years) without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, or renal failure. They were classified into eight phenotypes based on four BMI levels (underweight, <18.5; normal weight, 18.5-24.9; overweight, 25.0-29.9; and obese, ≥30.0 kg/m2) and the presence or absence of ≥2 of 4 metabolic abnormalities: high blood pressure, high triglycerides, low high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, and high blood sugar. Based on their health insurance claims data, we compared medical and dental care days and costs among the eight different BMI/metabolic phenotypes during 2010-2013. RESULTS: The combinations of BMI levels and metabolic status were significantly associated with the adjusted mean and median medical outpatient days and costs and the median dental outpatient days and costs. The obese/unhealthy subjects had the highest medical outpatient days and costs, and the underweight/unhealthy subjects had the highest dental outpatient days and costs. The underweight/unhealthy subjects also had the highest medical inpatient days and hospitalization rates of CVD, and had higher medical costs compared with the obese/healthy subjects. The differences in median medical costs between healthy and unhealthy phenotypes were larger year by year across all BMI levels. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of obesity phenotypes using both BMI levels (including the underweight level) and metabolic status may more precisely predict healthcare days and costs compared with either BMI or metabolic status alone.

Recent mortality from pleural mesothelioma, historical patterns of asbestos use, and adoption of bans: a global assessment.

BACKGROUND: In response to the health risks posed by asbestos exposure, some countries have imposed strict regulations and adopted bans, whereas other countries have intervened less and continue to use varying quantities of asbestos. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess, on a global scale, national experiences of recent mortality from pleural mesothelioma, historical trends in asbestos use, adoption of bans, and their possible interrelationships. METHODS: For 31 countries with available data, we analyzed recent pleural mesothelioma (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision) mortality rates (MRs) using age-adjusted period MRs (deaths/million/year) from 1996 to 2005. We calculated annual percent changes (APCs) in age-adjusted MRs to characterize trends during the period. We characterized historical patterns of asbestos use by per capita asbestos use (kilograms per capita/year) and the status of national bans. RESULTS: Period MRs increased with statistical significance in five countries, with marginal significance in two countries, and were equivocal in 24 countries (five countries in Northern and Western Europe recorded negative APC values). Countries adopting asbestos bans reduced use rates about twice as fast as those not adopting bans. Turning points in use preceded bans. Change in asbestos use during 1970-1985 was a significant predictor of APC in mortality for pleural mesothelioma, with an adjusted R(2) value of 0.47 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The observed disparities in global mesothelioma trends likely relate to country-to-country disparities in asbestos use trends.

[Asbestos clinics and asbestos health examinations--findings from a questionnaire survey of implementing organizations].

In June 2005 the press reported that many former employees of a company which used asbestos, and individuals who lived near the company's factory, had been diagnosed with mesothelioma. This finding triggered concern and alarm in Japan. In response, many "asbestos clinics" were formed, and recognized medical institutions began to implement asbestos-related health examinations. We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey to evaluate the activities in, and the challenges for, these medical institutions. We received 137 valid responses, more than half of which were from clinics and hospital-based "asbestos clinics" instigated after the "Kubota shock." Among the asbestos exposure history interviewing practices, job histories of the interviewee were prioritized, over place of residence, and possible exposure of family members. Standard questionnaires were utilized by over 70% of respondents. The practitioners reported problems with lack of manpower and evaluation of asbestos exposure. Examinees consulted attending physicians on a wide range of matters including asbestos-related diseases, asbestos exposure, and financial compensation. It is predicted that asbestos-related diseases in general, and mesothelioma in particular, will increase in the future. Accordingly, early detection and treatment should be accorded high priority. The organizations we surveyed have important roles to play. Although resources are limited, effective diagnosis and treatment are essential, and a system assisting organizations to make accurate and efficient identification of asbestos exposure hazards is imperative.