Physiological Assessment with iFR prior to FFR Measurement in Left Main Disease.

Despite guideline-based recommendation of the interchangeable use of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization decision-making, iFR/FFR could demonstrate different physiological or clinical outcomes in some specific patient or lesion subsets. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of difference between iFR and FFR-guided revascularization decision-making on clinical outcomes in patients with left main disease (LMD). In this international multicenter registry of LMD with physiological interrogation, we identified 275 patients in whom physiological assessment was performed with both iFR/FFR. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for both iFR/FFR to predict MACE in respective patients in whom revascularization was deferred and performed. In 153 patients of revascularization deferral, MACE occurred in 17.0% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR to predict MACE were 0.88 (specificity:0.74; sensitivity:0.65) and 0.76 (specificity:0.81; sensitivity:0.46), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher for iFR than FFR (0.74; 95%CI 0.62-0.85 vs. 0.62; 95%CI 0.48-0.75; p = 0.012). In 122 patients of coronary revascularization, MACE occurred in 13.1% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR were 0.92 (specificity:0.93; sensitivity:0.25) and 0.81 (specificity:0.047; sensitivity:1.00), respectively. The AUCs were not significantly different between iFR and FFR (0.57; 95%CI 0.40-0.73 vs. 0.46; 95%CI 0.31-0.61; p = 0.43). While neither baseline iFR nor FFR was predictive of MACE in patients in whom revascularization was performed, iFR-guided deferral seemed to be safer than FFR-guided deferral.

Prognostic impact of reducing myocardial ischemia identified using ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease: J-ACCESS 4 study.

AIM: Whether myocardial ischemia identified using myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be an alternative target of coronary revascularization to reduce the incidence of cardiac events remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter, prospective cohort study aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of reducing myocardial ischemia. Among 494 registered patients with possible or definite coronary artery disease (CAD), 298 underwent initial pharmacological stress 99mTc-tetrofosmin MPI before, and eight months after revascularization or medical therapy, and were followed up for at least one year. Among these, 114 with at least 5% ischemia at initial MPI were investigated. The primary endpoints were cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and hospitalization for heart failure. Ischemia was reduced ≥5% in 92 patients. Coronary revascularization reduced ischemia (n = 89) more effectively than medical therapy (n = 25). Post-stress cardiac function also improved after coronary revascularization. Ejection fraction significantly improved at stress (61.0% ±â€¯10.7% vs. 65.4% ±â€¯11.3%; p < 0.001) but not at rest (67.1% ±â€¯11.3% vs. 68.3% ±â€¯11.6%; p = 0.144), among patients who underwent revascularization. Rates of coronary revascularization and cardiac events among the 114 patients were significantly higher (13.6%, p = 0.035) and lower (1.1% p = 0.0053), respectively, in patients with, than without ≥5% ischemia reduction. Moreover, patients with complete resolution of ischemia at the time of the second MPI had a significantly better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing ischemia by ≥5% and the complete resolution of ischemia could improve the prognosis of patients with stable CAD.

Effect of individual proton pump inhibitors on cardiovascular events in patients treated with clopidogrel following coronary stenting: results from the Ibaraki Cardiac Assessment Study Registry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether combination therapy of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) causes higher numbers of cardiovascular events than clopidogrel alone in Japanese patients. BACKGROUND: PPIs are often prescribed in combination with clopidogrel following coronary stenting. PPIs are reported to diminish the effect of clopidogrel because both are metabolized by CYP2C19. However, no reports address the effects of PPIs on cardiovascular events following coronary stenting in the Japanese population. METHODS: A total of 1,887 patients treated with clopidogrel following coronary stenting were enrolled in the Ibaraki Cardiac Assessment Study (ICAS) registry. All subjects were classified into two groups according to treatment without (n = 819) or with (n = 1,068) PPI. Propensity score analysis matched 1:1 according to treatment without PPI (n = 500) or with PPI (n = 500). Primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the primary endpoint between the group without PPI and the group with PPI (4.6% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.77). In contrast, a significant difference was found between the group without PPI and with PPI in regard to the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding at the end of the follow-up period and the specific PPI prescribed (2.4% vs. 0.8%, adjusted HR = 0.30, 95% Confidence interval 0.08-0.87, P = 0.026) after propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: No significant association between PPI use and primary endpoint was observed in the Japanese population, whereas PPI use resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Simplified normal limits and automated quantitative assessment for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare normal limits and the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) with attenuation-corrected (AC) and non-attenuation-corrected (NC) myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS) by use of a recently improved automated quantification technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: We acquired 415 rest/stress technetium 99m MPS studies on a Vertex dual-detector camera with a gadolinium 153 line source (Vantage Pro). Gender-specific NC, AC, and gender-combined AC normal limits were created from rest/stress images of 50 women and 50 men with a low likelihood of CAD (< 5%) and a median body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 in each gender group. BMI-specific normal limits (< 30 kg/m2 and > or = 30 kg/m2) were also compared. Total perfusion deficit and 17-segment summed scores in 174 patients were compared with angiography, and normalcy rates were established from 141 studies of low-likelihood patients. There were no differences between low-BMI and high-BMI normal limits for AC or NC studies. Male and female normal limits differed in 12 of 17 segments for NC stress studies and in 3 of 17 segments for AC stress studies (P < .01). The sensitivity, specificity, and normalcy rates for stenoses with 70% narrowing or greater were 89%, 73%, and 91%, respectively, for NC studies and 87%, 80%, and 95%, respectively, for AC studies (P = not significant). CONCLUSION: Automated detection of CAD by AC and NC MPS demonstrated similar sensitivity, specificity, and normalcy rates. Some gender differences were noted for AC normal limits.

Rapid assessment of left ventricular segmental wall motion, ejection fraction, and volumes with single breath-hold, multi-slice TrueFISP MR imaging.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To reduce imaging time and complexity, we sought to determine whether single breath-hold, multi-slice TrueFISP (SB-MST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method is comparable to standard multi-breath-hold, multi-slice TrueFISP (MB-MST) for assessment of left ventricular (LV) wall motion abnormality (WMA), volumes, and ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 62 patients having cardiac MRI at 1.5-Tesla. After acquiring standard MB-MST (one slice per breath-hold), SB-MST was performed, acquiring 3 short- and 2 long-axis views over only 20 heartbeats. Using both techniques, wall motion was scored using a 6-point, 17-segment LV model for all scans (62 patients x 2 techniques/patient = 124 scans) on two separate occasions. Separately, EF and ventricular volumes were evaluated using both MB-MST and SB-MST. For all analyses, MB-MST was considered the standard against which SB-MST was compared. Twenty-six of 62 patients exhibited at least one segmental WMA by MB-MST. Exact agreement for wall motion was found in 965/1054 segments (92%, kappa = 0.74, p < 0.001), and agreement was within 1 score point in 1010/1054 segments (96%). Considering a score >1 abnormal, exact agreement for presence of WMA was found in 131/193 segments (68%) abnormal by MB-MST and for absence of WMA in 838/861 segments (97%) normal by MB-MST. Agreement within 1 score point occurred in 167/193 abnormal (87%) and in 843/861 normal segments (98%). There were no significant differences in agreement between first and second read of the data. Variability of SB-MST on read one versus read two was small (5%, 996/1054 segments read identically, p = ns) and statistically identical to variability of MB-MST on read one versus read two (4%, 1007/1054 segments read identically, p = ns). For end-diastolic volumes, end-systolic volumes, and EF using SB-MST compared to MB-MST, mean differences were 9 +/- 15 ml, 6 +/- 12 ml, and 2 +/- 5%, and correlations were r = 0.97, 0.98 and 0.95, respectively. CONCLUSION: SB-MST accurately assesses wall motion, volumes and EF. This approach may serve as a screening exam for assessment of WMA and, under select circumstances, may substitute for standard multi-breath-hold method in situations requiring rapid accurate assessments of LV function.

Assessment of diastolic function using 16-frame 99mTc-sestamibi gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: normal values.

UNLABELLED: The purposes of this study were (a) to assess the feasibility of diastolic function (DFx) evaluation using standard 16-frame postexercise gated (99m)Tc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS), (b) to determine the relationship of the 2 common DFx parameters, peak filling rate (PFR) and time to peak filling (TTPF), to clinical and systolic function (SFx) variables in patients with normal myocardial perfusion and SFx, and (c) to derive and validate normal limits. METHODS: Ninety patients (71 men; age, 30-79 y) with normal exercise gated MPS were studied. None had hypertension, diabetes, rest electrocardiogram abnormality, or known cardiac disease. All patients reached > or = 85% of maximum predicted heart rate (HR). The population was randomized into derivation (n = 50) and validation (n = 40) groups. Univariable and multivariable approaches were deployed to assess the influence of clinical and functional variables on DFx parameters. RESULTS: PFR and TTPF were assessed in all patients. Mean values of PFR and TTPF in the whole study population were 2.62 +/- 0.46 end-diastolic volumes per second (EDV/s) and 164.6 +/- 21.7 ms, respectively. By applying a 2-SD cutoff to the mean values in the derivation group, the threshold for abnormal PFR and the threshold for abnormal TTPF were < 1.71 EDV/s and > 216.7 ms, respectively. The normalcy rates in the validation group for PFR and TTPF were both 100%. The PFR showed weak but significant correlations with age, EDV, end-systolic volume, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and poststress HR. However, TTPF did not correlate with these parameters. Final normal thresholds determined from the combined populations were PFR = 1.70 EDV/s and TTPF = 208 ms. Multivariable analysis showed that age, sex, LVEF, and HR are strong predictors for PFR, whereas TTPF was not influenced by any clinical or SFx variable. CONCLUSION: With a new algorithm in QGS, assessment of LV DFx is feasible using 16-frame gated MPS even without bad-beat rejection, resulting in normal limits similar to those reported with gated blood-pool studies. However, due to the dependency of PFR on SFx parameters, sex, HR, and age, TTPF appears to be a stable and more useful parameter with this approach. The clinical usefulness of these findings requires further study.