Clinical Impact of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Using a Novel Franseen Needle for Histological Assessment of Pancreatic Diseases.

Background and Aims: Several studies have shown the benefits of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using a Franseen needle for histological assessment. However, studies focusing on pancreatic diseases are limited and the safety of this method has not been well assessed. We aimed to assess the current status and issues of EUS-FNB in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 87 consecutive EUS-FNB specimens using either a 22-gauge Franseen needle (Group A, N = 51) or a conventional 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle (Group B, N = 36) for pancreatic diseases, and the diagnostic accuracy and safety were compared. Final diagnoses were obtained based on surgical pathology or a minimum six-month clinical follow-up. Results: Although the diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was 96.1% in Group A versus 88.9% in Group B, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.19), the median sample area was significantly larger in Group A (4.07 versus 1.31mm2, P < 0.0001). There were no differences between the two needles in the locations from which the specimens were obtained. Adverse events occurred in one case (2%) in Group A (mild pancreatitis) and none in Group B with no statistical significance (P = 0.586). Although there was no case of bleeding defined as adverse events, 2 cases in Group A showed active bleeding during the procedure with increase in the echo-free space, which required CT scanning to rule out extravasation. Eventually, the bleeding stopped spontaneously. Conclusions: Given its guaranteed ability to obtain core specimens and comparable safety, and although the risk of bleeding should be kept in mind, EUS-FNB using a Franseen needle is likely to become a standard procedure for obtaining pancreatic tissue in the near future.

Two-year vessel healing after everolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial assessment by optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have suggested the importance of delayed arterial healing and the development of neoatherosclerosis as major contributors to stent thrombosis and delayed restenosis. The difference of in vivo assessment of long-term vessel healing between first-generation drug-eluting stents and current generation everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term arterial healing in EES in comparison with the first generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). METHODS: We evaluated 31 EES (23 patients) and 8 SES (7 patients) by serial optical coherence tomography at 12 months (mid-phase) and 24 months (late-phase) after stenting and evaluated the change in neointimal thickness (NIT), the percentages of uncovered struts, peri-strut low intensity area (PLIA; region around stent struts homogenously lower-intensity appearance than surrounding tissue), and thrombus. RESULTS: Although the average NIT showed no significant changes from the mid- to the late-phase follow-up in both EES and SES groups, the change in NIT and minimum lumen area was significantly larger in SES than EES (5.2±29.4 vs. 37.2±48.9; p=0.02, -0.06±0.36 vs. -0.45±0.74; p=0.04, respectively). The incidence of uncovered struts and struts with PLIA of EES was lower than those of SES, at both phases. Stents with in-stent thrombus of EES tended to be lower than that of SES at both phase follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Although both SES and EES showed progressive luminal narrowing from the mid- to the late-phase follow-up, the extent of delayed lumen narrowing and delayed neointimal proliferation was significantly less in the second generation EES than the first generation SES. EESs seem to offer sustained stability in efficacy, without sacrificing safety, up to 2 years after implantation.

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of stent restenosis by optical coherence tomography: comparison between drug-eluting and bare-metal stents.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the tissue components of in-stent restenosis (ISR) might differ between drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) and that these differences could be distinguished by qualitative and quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) analyses. METHODS AND RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-two initial ISR lesions (sirolimus-eluting stents: n=28; paclitaxel-eluting stents: n=51; BMS: n=43) were evaluated with OCT. Based on their OCT appearance, the lesions were classified as homogeneous, layered or heterogeneous. The optical properties of backscatter, attenuation and signal intensity of the neointimal tissue (NIT) were quantified. To evaluate the vascular response after balloon angioplasty (BA), the rate of reduction of the NIT area (NITA) was calculated (NITA before - after BA/NITA before BA at the minimum lumen cross-sectional area). Among the morphologic OCT patterns, the layered type was predominant with DES, whereas lesions were homogeneous with BMS (P<0.001). Backscatter and signal intensity were significantly higher with BMS (P<0.05 and P<0.001 respectively). The NITA reduction rate was significantly greater in the layered and heterogeneous groups than in the homogeneous group (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The morphologic OCT patterns of the NIT in ISR differed significantly between DES and BMS, probably reflecting pathologic differences. Layered and heterogeneous tissues might respond better than homogeneous tissue to simple balloon dilatation, suggesting a possible direction for OCT-based ISR treatment strategies.

Impact of stent platform of paclitaxel-eluting stents: assessment of neointimal distribution on optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: The Taxus Express™ paclitaxel-eluting stent (Express-PES) and Taxus Liberté™ PES (Liberté-PES) have identical drugs, drug doses, and polymers, but different stent platforms. The Liberté-PES platform has thinner struts, specifically designed for more uniform drug elution. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-four patients who underwent 6-month follow-up optical coherence tomography (OCT) after Express-PES (n=27) or Liberté-PES (n=27) implantation were enrolled. Longitudinal and circumferential uniformity of neointimal distribution was evaluated in 3-D by computing mean neointimal thickness (NIT) within 360 equally spaced radial sectors for every 1-mm cross-section. After stenting, intravascular ultrasound showed that Liberté-PES had a significantly smaller maximum angle between adjacent struts, with a tendency toward a lower incidence of % length of the segment with maximum angle >90° than Express-PES. Liberté-PES had a significantly thinner mean NIT than the Express-PES with comparable frequency of uncovered struts. Longitudinal and circumferential absolute variation of NIT expressed by standard deviation of NIT from each sector was significantly smaller for Liberté-PES than for Express-PES. Liberté-PES had a tendency toward a decreased incidence of thrombus and peri-strut low-intensity areas (findings suggestive of delayed arterial healing), compared to Express-PES. CONCLUSIONS: Stent design and thickness appeared to affect neointima suppression of PES. The stent platform of the Liberté-PES may offer greater and more homogeneous reduction of neointimal proliferation spatially across the full length of the PES.