Estimated Annual Economic Burden of Dry Eye Disease Based on a Multi-Center Analysis in China: A Retrospective Study.

Purpose: To conduct a multi-center analysis and assess the economic burden due to dry eye disease (DED) in China. Design: A retrospective and cross-sectional study. Methods: Patients (n = 598) with diagnosed DED were recruited from 3 eye centers (in central, southeast, and northeast China) from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018. Data were collected regarding the examination, pharmacological therapy, and non-pharmacological therapy fees. Sub-group analyses were stratified by eye center, DED severity, types of DED, number of visits to physicians, and residential area. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the variables influencing total costs. Results: The per capita costs devoted to DED at the 3 centers were 422.6, 391.3, and 265.4 USD, respectively. The costs of non-pharmacological therapy accounted the largest part in three centers (75.6, 76.4, 76.5%, respectively). Patients with severe DED sustained the largest economic burden. Patients with mixed type of DED spent the most comparing to patients with either evaporative or aqueous-deficient types of DED. Patients spent more during the first visit compared with subsequent visits. Patients living in urban areas spent significantly more than did those living in rural areas (P = 0.001). The logistics regression analysis showed that total costs were significantly influenced by DED severity, number of visits to physicians, and area of residence (beta = 2.83, 0.83, 1.48; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: DED is a chronic ocular disease that timely non-cost counseling, early diagnosis, and efficacious treatment can reduce its economic burden on patients and the society.

Twelve-week ribavirin-free direct-acting antivirals for treatment-experienced Chinese with HCV genotype 1b infection including cirrhotic patients.

BACKGROUND: Treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype (GT) 1b represents a major medical burden in China. We evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of ribavirin (RBV)-free pan-oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in treatment-experienced Chinese with GT1b CHC, including patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: One hundred forty treatment-experienced GT1b CHC Chinese with and without cirrhosis were included in this study. Ninety-four patients were treated with either daclatasvir (DCV, 60 mg)-sofosbuvir (SOF, 400 mg) (group 1, n = 46) or ledipasvir (LDV, 90 mg)-SOF (400 mg) (group 2, n = 48) for 12 weeks. Forty-six patients treated with pegylated interferon and RBV therapy for 72 weeks were enrolled as the control group (group 3). Patients were followed at 4-weekly intervals till 24 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: All patients in group 1 (46/46, 100 %) and 2 (48/48, 100 %) had achieved sustained virologic response at 24 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR 24), which was significantly higher than that of group 3 (13/46, 28.3 %) (p < 0.001). The SVR 24 rates of cirrhotic patients in group 1 (27/27, 100 %) and 2 (27/27, 100 %) were also significantly higher than that of group 3 (3/25, 12 %) (p < 0.001). Twelve weeks of RBV-free LDV-SOF and DCV-SOF was either cost-saving or cost-effective. Adverse events were significantly lower in group 1 and 2 compared with group 3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with standard therapies, 12 weeks of RBV-free DAA therapies is highly effective, well tolerated and cost-effective in treatment-experienced Chinese with GT1b CHC including patients with cirrhosis.

Will Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir (Harvoni) Be Cost-Effective and Affordable for Chinese Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus? An Economic Analysis Using Real-World Data.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on the cost-effectiveness of novel regimens for hepatitis C virus (HCV) compared with standard-of-care with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in developing countries. We evaluated cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir for 12 weeks compared with a 48-week pegIFN-RBV regimen in Chinese patients with genotype 1b HCV infection by economic regions. METHODS: A decision analytic Markov model was developed to estimate quality-adjusted-life-years, lifetime cost of HCV infection and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). SVR rates and direct medical costs were obtained from real-world data. Parameter uncertainty was assessed by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Threshold analysis was conducted to estimate the price which can make the regimen cost-effective and affordable. RESULTS: Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir was cost-effective in treatment-experienced patients with an ICER of US$21,612. It varied by economic regions. The probability of cost-effectiveness was 18% and 47% for treatment-naive and experienced patients, and it ranged from 15% in treatment-naïve patients in Central-China to 64% in treatment-experienced patients in Eastern-China. The price of 12-week sofosbuvir/ledipasvir treatment needs to be reduced by at least 81% to US$18,185 to make the regimen cost-effective in all patients at WTP of one time GDP per capita. The price has to be US$105 to make the regimen affordable in average patients in China. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir regimen is not cost-effective in most Chinese patients with genotype 1b HCV infection. The results vary by economic regions. Drug price of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir needs to be substantially reduced when entering the market in China to ensure the widest accessibility.