Effectiveness and safety of the pre-prescription of garenoxacin in comparison to moxifloxacin for low-risk febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the pre-prescription of garenoxacin mesylate hydrate (GRNX) with that of moxifloxacin hydrochloride (MFLX) in the management of breast cancer patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia. METHODS: Data from female patients who had been instructed to take previously prescribed oral GRNX or MFLX for 3 days during adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy if their body temperature exceeded 38 °C were analyzed. This study compared the effectiveness between these fluoroquinolones using a propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS: The 330 patients received 1192 administrations of chemotherapy between May 2007 and April 2014 and 136 (41.2%) patients had a total of 212 (17.8%) febrile episodes. The frequencies of febrile episodes were 19.5% (113/579) and 16.2% (99/613) in the GRNX and MFLX groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 384 episodes were matched in each group. Febrile events occurred in 80 and 56 cases in the GRNX and MFLX groups, respectively. Treatment success was identified in 80.0% (64/80) of cases in the GRNX group and 64.3% (36/56) of cases in the MFLX group (P = 0.0494). Additionally, the therapeutic use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was 6.3% (5/80) of cases in the GRNX group and 17.9% (10/56) of cases in the MFLX group (P = 0.0498). There were few differences in the frequency of adverse effects between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the pre-prescription of GRNX may be a more effective option for the management of low-risk febrile neutropenia during adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Ambulatory sentinel lymph node biopsy preceding neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB)-oriented stepwise treatment under local anesthesia has been performed in the outpatient-ambulatory setting in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We retrospectively reviewed our preliminary experience of ambulatory SNB in breast cancer patients scheduled to undergo NAT to evaluate the usefulness and feasibility of this method as a minimally invasive, stepwise treatment protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 56 patients with breast cancer without obvious nodal involvement who were scheduled to receive NAT before breast surgery. SNB was performed under local anesthesia in an ambulatory outpatient setting before the initiation of NAT. RESULTS: The average number of removed sentinel lymph nodes was 1.9. Identification of the sentinel node was possible in all cases, and macrometastasis was observed in six cases (10.7%). Micrometastasis was observed in five cases, while isolated tumor cells were noted in six cases. There were no delays in the initiation of NAT as a result of complications of SNB. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of ambulatory SNB prior to NAT. Further studies are warranted to assess the strict indications, patient satisfaction, and medical economics of this procedure.