Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rofo ; 178(11): 1086-94, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17133669

RESUMO

The advent of Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) has made evaluation of the entire urinary tract with high-resolution sections during a single breath-hold a reality. Acquisition of multiple thin overlapping slices provides excellent two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) reformations of the urinary tract. The concept of "Multislice CT Urography (MSCTU)" has emerged from this technical improvement. As a result, a wide range of pathologies inside and outside the urinary tract can be identified. During the last several years, MSCTU has challenged intravenous urography (IVU) in the evaluation of urinary tract abnormalities. Compared with IVU, MSCT(U) is more sensitive and specific in the detection and characterization of a variety of urinary tract disorders, including renal masses and urolithiasis. The main advantage of IVU has been its ability to offer excellent delineation of pelvicalyceal and ureteral anatomy and to depict subtle uroepithelial abnormalities. MSCTU has already shown promising results for overcoming this challenge. Optimal opacification and distension appear to be an essential requirement for a thorough evaluation of the collecting system. Dedicated preparation strategies have been developed to meet these technical difficulties. The biggest disadvantage of MSCTU is the significant radiation exposure. For broad routine clinical application, there is still a need for dose reduction protocols despite the ongoing technical developments in MSCTU. In this article, we outline the different concepts of technical processing for MSCTU and summarize the current role of MSCTU in the evaluation of the upper urinary tract.


Assuntos
Aumento da Imagem , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Tomografia Computadorizada Espiral , Urografia , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Doses de Radiação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Urolitíase/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Rofo ; 178(1): 78-89, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16392061

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the economic efficiency of a whole-radiology in- and outpatient treatment with angiographic interventions performed as the main or sole therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The calculations represent the data of a university radiology department, including the following angiographic interventions (neuroradiology not considered): Vascular intervention (PTA, stent implantation) of kidneys and extremities, recanalization of hemodialysis access, chemoembolization, diagnostic arterioportal liver CT, port implantation, varicocele embolization, PTCD, percutaneous implantation of biliary stent. First, the different angiographic interventions are categorized with reference to the German DRG system 2005. Considering the example of a university hospital, the individual cost of each intervention is calculated and correlated with reimbursements by G-DRG2005 and so-called "ambulant operation" (EBM200plus). With these data, profits and losses are calculated for both in- and outpatient care. RESULTS: Radiologic interventions of inpatients yield a profit in the majority of cases. With a base rate of 2900 euros, the profits in our university hospital range between - 872 euros and + 3411 euros (mean: + 1348 euros). On the other hand, those angiographic interventions suitable for "ambulant operation" generate average profits of + 372 euros, if only direct costs are considered. The data of outpatient radiological interventions average between 381 euros up to 1612 euros lower than compared with profits obtained from in patient care. CONCLUSION: Once an angiographic intervention represents the major or sole therapy, German radiologists are advised to operate out- and inpatient care by themselves. In Germany, the G-DRG-system and EBM enable radiology departments to generate considerable proceeds for their hospitals and, secondly, to yield a valuable add-on profit for their own department budget, which then is partly detached from the inflexible conventional reimbursement of radiological services.


Assuntos
Angiografia/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Alemanha , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias/economia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA