Gender bias in colorectal surgery fellowship letters of recommendation.

BACKGROUND: As leaders strive to create equitable surgical pipelines, one process under scrutiny is letters of recommendation (LORs). We sought to review the Colon and Rectal Surgery (CRS) Resident Candidate Assessment questionnaire and LORs for gendered differences. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of letters of recommendation to CRS fellowship during the 2018-2019 application cycle utilized linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2015) software to assess letter length and themes comparing differences by applicant and referee gender. RESULTS: 103 applicants (35 â€‹% women) with 363 LORs (16 â€‹% written by women) were included. Short answer responses were longer for women applicants, while LORs were longer for men applicants (368 vs 325 words p â€‹= â€‹0.03). Men applicants' strengths had more technical skill descriptors, while women applicants' strengths had more emotional language and cognitive and perceptual words. CONCLUSIONS: This study found significant differences between LORs written for CRS fellowship applicants based on gender.

Endoscopy for diagnosis and treatment in esophageal cancers: high-technology assessment.

The following, from the 12th OESO World Conference: Cancers of the Esophagus, includes commentaries on the endoscopic tools to recognize squamous cell dysplasia; confocal laser endomicroscopy for Barrett's esophagus; confocal microscopy in the cancer patient; optical coherence tomography in the assessment of subsquamous Barrett's metaplasia; endoscopic mucosal resection for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus; HALO in the treatment of squamous dysplasia; and the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus.