Joint EURADOS-EANM initiative for an advanced computational framework for the assessment of external dose rates from nuclear medicine patients.

BACKGROUND: In order to ensure adequate radiation protection of critical groups such as staff, caregivers and the general public coming into proximity of nuclear medicine (NM) patients, it is necessary to consider the impact of the radiation emitted by the patients during their stay at the hospital or after leaving the hospital. Current risk assessments are based on ambient dose rate measurements in a single position at a specified distance from the patient and carried out at several time points after administration of the radiopharmaceutical to estimate the whole-body retention. The limitations of such an approach are addressed in this study by developing and validating a more advanced computational dosimetry approach using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations in combination with flexible and realistic computational phantoms and time activity distribution curves from reference biokinetic models. RESULTS: Measurements of the ambient dose rate equivalent H*(10) at 1 m from the NM patient have been successfully compared against MC simulations with 5 different codes using the ICRP adult reference computational voxel phantoms, for typical clinical procedures with 99mTc-HDP/MDP, 18FDG and Na131I. All measurement data fall in the 95% confidence intervals, determined for the average simulated results. Moreover, the different MC codes (MCNP-X, PHITS, GATE, GEANT4, TRIPOLI-4®) have been compared for a more realistic scenario where the effective dose rate E of an exposed individual was determined in positions facing and aside the patient model at 30 cm, 50 cm and 100 cm. The variation between codes was lower than 8% for all the radiopharmaceuticals at 1 m, and varied from 5 to 16% for the face-to face and side-by-side configuration at 30 cm and 50 cm. A sensitivity study on the influence of patient model morphology demonstrated that the relative standard deviation of H*(10) at 1 m for the range of included patient models remained under 16% for time points up to 120 min post administration. CONCLUSIONS: The validated computational approach will be further used for the evaluation of effective dose rates per unit administered activity for a variety of close-contact configurations and a range of radiopharmaceuticals as part of risk assessment studies. Together with the choice of appropriate dose constraints this would facilitate the setting of release criteria and patient restrictions.

Metrics, dose, and dose concept: the need for a proper dose concept in the risk assessment of nanoparticles.

In order to calculate the dose for nanoparticles (NP), (i) relevant information about the dose metrics and (ii) a proper dose concept are crucial. Since the appropriate metrics for NP toxicity are yet to be elaborated, a general dose calculation model for nanomaterials is not available. Here we propose how to develop a dose assessment model for NP in analogy to the radiation protection dose calculation, introducing the so-called "deposited and the equivalent dose". As a dose metric we propose the total deposited NP surface area (SA), which has been shown frequently to determine toxicological responses e.g. of lung tissue. The deposited NP dose is proportional to the total surface area of deposited NP per tissue mass, and takes into account primary and agglomerated NP. By using several weighting factors the equivalent dose additionally takes into account various physico-chemical properties of the NP which are influencing the biological responses. These weighting factors consider the specific surface area, the surface textures, the zeta-potential as a measure for surface charge, the particle morphology such as the shape and the length-to-diameter ratio (aspect ratio), the band gap energy levels of metal and metal oxide NP, and the particle dissolution rate. Furthermore, we discuss how these weighting factors influence the equivalent dose of the deposited NP.

[Acquisition and assessment of patient exposure in diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine]. / Erfassung und Bewertung der Patientenexposition in der diagnostischen Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin.

The regular annual monitoring of patient exposure in radiation diagnostics, as performed by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), plays an important role in evaluating the awareness of radiological quality and safety in Germany and the risk-benefit optimization for patients. For the reporting year 1997, X-ray diagnostics resulted in a mean effective dose of 2 +/- 0.5 mSv per head of population. The underlying frequency of medical X-ray examinations was approximately 136 million, i.e., 1.7 examinations annually per head of population. In terms of nuclear medicine diagnostics, the patients exposure amounted to approximately 0.15 mSv effective dose per head of population. In this case, the number of examinations amounted to approximately 4 million, corresponding to a frequency of approximately 0.05 examinations annually per head of population. The paper discusses factors influencing the calculation of exposure, as well as the lack of an internationally accepted protocol to evaluate patient exposure.