Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hosp Pediatr ; 13(9): 849-856, 2023 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37584151

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs (CYSHCN) have differing risk factors and injury characteristics compared with peers without special health care needs (SHCN). We examined the association between SHCN status and complications, mortality, and length of stay (LOS) after trauma hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using 2018 data from the National Trauma Data Bank for patients aged 1 to 18 years (n = 108 062). We examined the following hospital outcomes: any complication reported, unplanned admission to the ICU, in-hospital mortality, and hospital and ICU LOS. Multivariate regression models estimated the effect of SHCN status on hospital outcomes after controlling for patient demographics, injury severity score, and Glasgow Coma Score. Subanalyses examined outcomes by age, SHCN, and injury severity score. RESULTS: CYSHCN encounters had a greater adjusted relative risk (ARR) of any hospital complications (ARR = 2.980) and unplanned admission to the ICU (ARR = 1.996) than encounters that did not report a SHCN (P < .001). CYSHCN had longer hospital (incidence rate ratio = 1.119) and ICU LOS (incidence rate ratio = 1.319, both P < .001). There were no statistically significant in-hospital mortality differences between CYSHCN and those without. Lower severity trauma was associated with a greater ARR of hospital complications for CYSHCN encounters versus non-CYSHCN encounters. CONCLUSIONS: CYSHCN, particularly those with lower-acuity injuries, are at greater risk for developing complications and requiring more care after trauma hospitalization. Future studies may examine mechanisms of hospital complications for traumatic injuries among CYSHCN to develop prevention and risk-minimization strategies.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Tempo de Internação , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Atenção à Saúde
2.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1244042, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38186698

RESUMO

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, more commonly known as the ACA, was legislation passed in the United States in 2010 to expand access to health insurance coverage for millions of Americans with a key emphasis on preventive care. Nutrition plays a critical role in overall wellness, disease prevention and resilience to chronic illness but prior to the ACA many Americans did not have adequate health insurance coverage to ensure proper nutrition. With passage of the ACA, more individuals received access to nutritional counseling through their primary care physicians as well as prescription vitamins and supplements free of charge. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a national health insurance reform on nutrient intake among general population, including more vulnerable low-income individuals and patients with chronic conditions. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we identified 8,443 adults aged 21 years and older who participated in the survey before (2011-2012) and after the ACA (2015-2016) implementation and conducted a subgroup analysis of 952 respondents who identified as Medicaid beneficiaries and 719 patients with a history of cancer. Using pre-post study design and bivariate and multivariable logistic analyses, we compared nutrient intake from food and supplementation before and after the ACA and identified risk factors for inadequate intake. Our results suggest that intake of micronutrients found in nutrient-dense foods, mainly fruit and vegetables, has not changed significantly after the ACA. However, overall use of nutritional supplements increased after the ACA (p = 0.05), particularly magnesium (OR = 1.02), potassium (OR = 0.76), vitamin D (both D2, and D3, OR = 1.34), vitamin K (OR = 1.15) and zinc (OR = 0.83), for the general population as well as those in our subgroup analysis Cancer Survivors and Medicaid Recipients. Given the association of increased use of nutritional supplements and expansion of insurance access, particularly in our subgroup analysis, more research is necessary to understand the effect of increasing access to nutritional supplements on the overall intake of micro- and macronutrients to meet daily nutritional recommended allowances.


Assuntos
Nutrientes , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Humanos , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Vitaminas , Estado Nutricional , Vitamina K
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 126(8): 1434-1441, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35986891

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are increasing in practice, however, data remains limited regarding perioperative outcomes. Our study sought to compare patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) with those undergoing laparoscopic (LPD) or robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). METHODS: Patients who underwent PD during 2016-2018 were identified from the New York State Planning and Research Cooperative System database. RESULTS: Of the 1954 patients identified, 1708 (87.4%) underwent OPD, 165 (8.4%) underwent LPD, and 81 (4.2%) underwent RPD. The majority of patients were White (63.8%), males (53.3%) with a mean age of 65.4 years. RPD patients had a lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (2) than OPD (3) or LPD (3, p = 0.01) and had a lower 30-day rate of complications (35.8% vs. 48.3% vs. 43.6% respectively, p = 0.05). After propensity-score matching, however, there were no differences between the groups regarding overall complications, surgical site infections, anastomotic leaks, or mortality (p = NS for all). OPD demonstrated a longer length of stay (median 8 days) compared to LPD (7 days) or RPD (7 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing LPD and RPD have a shorter length of hospital stay compared to OPD and there was no difference in overall morbidity or mortality when matched to similar patients.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , New York/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia
4.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 93(3): 299-306, 2022 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35293370

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) have or are at an increased risk for a chronic condition necessitating medical and related services beyond what children usually require. While evidence suggests that CYSHCN are at an increased risk of injury, little is known about this population within the trauma system. This study describes CYSHCN within the pediatric trauma system and examines patterns of injury risk (i.e., intent, place of injury, trauma type, and mechanism of injury) based on special health care need (SHCN) status. METHODS: For this cross-sectional study, we used data from the 2018 National Trauma Data Bank to identify pediatric encounters (1-18 years, N = 115,578) and compare demographics (sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and age) by CYSHCN status using χ 2 and t tests. Children and youth with special health care needs encounters were compared with non-SHCN encounters using multinomial logistic regression models, controlling for demographics. RESULTS: Overall, 16.7% pediatric encounters reported an SHCN. Children and youth with special health care needs encounters are older, and a higher proportion is publicly insured than non-SHCN encounters ( p < 0.001). Furthermore, CYSHCN encounters have a higher risk of assault (relative risk, 1.331) and self-inflicted (relative risk, 4.208) injuries relative to unintentional injury ( p < 0.001), as well as a higher relative risk of traumatic injury occurring in a private residence ( p < 0.01) than other locations such as school (relative risk, 0.894). Younger CYSHCN encounters have a higher risk of assault relative to unintentional injury when compared with non-SHCN encounters ( p < 0.01). Pediatric trauma encounters reporting mental health and alcohol/substance use disorder SHCN have a higher probability of self-inflicted and assault injuries than non-SHCN encounters ( p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that CYSHCN have different traumatic injury patterns than their non-SHCN peers, particularly in terms of intentional and private residence injury, and deserve a special focus for traumatic injury prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic, level III.


Assuntos
Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Adolescente , Criança , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , Humanos
5.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(24)2021 Dec 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34944894

RESUMO

Cancer patients are at risk for malnutrition; the aim of this study was to provide a cost-effectiveness analysis of dietary supplementation in cancer survivors. We estimated prevalence of supplementation, hospitalization rates, quality of life (QOL), cost of care and mortality among cancer survivors. We built a decision analytic model to simulate life-long costs of health care and supplementation and QOL among cancer survivors with and without supplementation. Cost of supplements was derived from national pharmacy databases including single- and multivitamin formularies. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to changes in supplementation costs and duration. The study cohort represented the national cancer survivor population (average age 61 years, 85% white, 52% male, and 94% insured). Hospitalization rates for supplement users and non-users were 12% and 21%, respectively. The cost of hospitalization was $4030. Supplementation was associated with an additional 0.48 QALYs (10.26 vs. 9.78) at the incremental cost of $2094 ($236,933 vs. $234,839) over the remaining lifetime of survivors (on average 13 years). Adequate nutrition provides a cost-effective strategy to achieving potentially optimum health. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of specific nutrient doses and supplementation on long-term outcomes per cancer type.

6.
Ann Surg ; 274(3): e245-e252, 2021 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397456

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine real-life patterns of care and patient outcomes associated with robot-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) in New York State (NYS). BACKGROUND: Although robotic assistance may offer some technological advantages, RACs are associated with higher procedural costs and longer operating times compared to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs). Evidence on long-term patient outcomes after RAC from large population-based datasets remains limited and inconsistent. METHODS: Using NYS inpatient and ambulatory surgery data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (2009-2017), we conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine patterns of utilization, complications, and secondary procedures following cholecystectomies. RESULTS: Among 299,306 minimally invasive cholecystectomies performed in NYS between 2009 and 2017, one thousand one hundred eighteen (0.4%) were robot-assisted. Compared to those undergoing LC, RAC patients were older, travelled further for surgery, and were more likely to have public insurance and preoperative comorbidities. RAC versus LC patients were more significantly likely to have conversions to open procedure (4.9% vs 2.8%), bile duct injuries (1.3% vs 0.4%), and major reconstructive interventions (0.6% vs 0.1%), longer median length of stay (3 vs 1 day), readmissions (7.3% vs 4.4%), and higher 12-month post-index surgery hospital charges (P < 0.01 for all estimates). Other postoperative complications decreased over time for LC but remained unchanged for RAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving RAC in NYS experienced higher rates of complications compared to LC patients. Addressing patient-, surgeon-, and system-level factors associated with intra/postoperative complications and applying recently promulgated safe cholecystectomy strategies coupled with advanced imaging modalities like fluorescence cholangiography to RAC may improve patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Comorbidade , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia
7.
Popul Health Manag ; 24(6): 664-674, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33989067

RESUMO

Using telemedicine to improve asthma management in underserved communities has been shown to be highly effective. However, program operating costs are perceived as the main barrier to dissemination and scaling up. This study evaluated whether a novel, evidence-based School-Based Telemedicine Enhanced Asthma Management (SB-TEAM) program, designed to overcome barriers to care for families of urban school-aged children, can be financially sustainable in real-world urban school settings. Eligible children (n = 400) had physician-diagnosed asthma with persistent or poorly controlled symptoms at baseline. Total costs included the cost of implementing and running the SB-TEAM program, asthma-related health care costs, cost of caregiver lost productivity in wages related to child illness, and school absenteeism fees. Using data from the SB-TEAM study and national data on wages and equipment costs, the authors modeled low, actual, and high-cost scenarios. The actual cost of administering the SB-TEAM program averaged $344 per child. Expenses incurred by families for medical care ($982), caregiver productivity cost ($415), and school absenteeism costs ($284) in SB-TEAM were not different from the costs in the control group ($1594, $492, and $318 [P > 0.05]). The study findings remained robust under sensitivity analyses for various state- and school-specific regulations, staffing requirements, and wages. The authors concluded that the SB-TEAM program operating costs may be offset by the reduction in health care costs, caregiver lost wages, and school absenteeism associated with the program health benefit.


Assuntos
Asma , Telemedicina , Asma/terapia , Cuidadores , Criança , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Instituições Acadêmicas
8.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 21(1): 258, 2021 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33743706

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of the US Medicaid expansion on care utilization and health outcomes of patients treated in the inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF). METHODS: A retrospective observational study with a difference-in-difference design. The data was obtained from Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI). Sample included all Medicaid beneficiaries (aged 18-64 years) who received initial inpatient rehabilitation for stroke, hip fracture (acute conditions), or joint replacement (elective condition) (N = 14,917) before (2013) and after (2016) the expansion. The study estimated the differences in length of stay, functional improvement, and possibility of returning to community before and after ACA Medicaid expansion in the expansion regions relative to the non-expansion regions. The analysis was fully adjusted for patient demographics, health conditions, facility characteristics and time trends. RESULTS: Compared with non-expansion states, service volume in the expansion regions increased more for the two acute conditions (49 and 27% vs. 1% and - 4%) and decreased less for the selective condition (- 12% vs. -34%) after ACA Medicaid expansion. Medicaid expansion was associated with significant decreases in patient functional improvements (- 1.63 points for stroke, - 3.61 points for fracture and - 2.73 points for joint; P < 0.05). Length of stay and the possibility of returning to community after discharge were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion was associated with increases in the utilization of inpatient rehabilitation services and decreases in the patient functional improvements. Cautions should be taken with the decreases in functional improvements among some subpopulation in the short-term; longer follow up periods are needed to account for gradual changes in patient needs.


Assuntos
Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Medicaid , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(3): e201204, 2020 03 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32186746

RESUMO

Importance: Enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) has been increasing and has reached one-third of total Medicare enrollment. Because of data limitations, direct comparison of inpatient rehabilitation services between MA and traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries has been very scarce. Subgroups of elderly individuals admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) may experience different care outcomes by insurance types. Objective: To measure the differences in length of stay and health outcomes of inpatient rehabilitation services between TM and MA beneficiaries in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multiyear cross-sectional study used the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation to assess rehabilitation services received by elderly (aged >65 years) Medicare beneficiaries in IRFs between 2007 and 2016 for stroke, hip fracture, and joint replacement. Generalized linear models were used to assess whether an association existed between Medicare insurance type and IRF care outcomes. Models were adjusted for demographic characteristics, clinical conditions, and facility characteristics. Data were analyzed from September 2018 to August 2019. Exposures: Medicare insurance plan type, TM or MA. Main Outcomes and Measures: Inpatient length of stay in IRFs, functional improvements, and possibility of returning to the community after discharge. Results: The sample included a total of 1 028 470 patients (634 619 women [61.7%]; mean [SD] age, 78.23 [7.26] years): 473 017 patients admitted for stroke, 323 029 patients admitted for hip fracture, and 232 424 patients admitted for joint replacement. Individuals enrolled in MA plans were younger than TM beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 76.96 [7.02] vs 77.95 [7.26] years for stroke, 79.92 [6.93] vs 80.85 [6.87] years for hip fracture, and 74.79 [6.58] vs 75.88 [6.80] years for joint replacement) and were more likely to be black (17 086 [25.5%] vs 54 648 [17.9%] beneficiaries) or Hispanic (14 496 [28.5%] vs 24 377 [8.3%] beneficiaries). The MA beneficiaries accounted for 21.8% (103 204 of 473 017) of admissions for stroke, 11.5% (37 160 of 323 029) of admissions for hip fracture, and 11.8% (27 314 of 232 424) of admissions for joint replacement. The MA beneficiaries had shorter mean lengths of stay than did TM beneficiaries for both stroke (0.11 day; 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.07 day; 1.15% shorter) and hip fracture (0.17 day; 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.13 day; 0.85% shorter). The MA beneficiaries also had higher possibilities of returning to the community than did TM beneficiaries, by 3.0% (95% CI, 2.6%-3.4%) for stroke and 5.0% (95% CI, 4.4%-5.6%) for hip fracture. The shorter length of stay and better ultimate outcomes were achieved without substantially compromising the intermediate functional improvements. Facility type (freestanding vs within an acute care hospital) and patient alternative payment sources other than Medicare (none vs other) partially explained the differences between insurance types. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that MA enrollees experience shorter length of stay and better outcomes for postacute care than do TM beneficiaries in IRFs. The magnitude of the differences depends on treatment deferability, patient sociodemographic subgroups, and facility characteristics.


Assuntos
Tempo de Internação/economia , Medicare Part C/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Reabilitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/economia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Estados Unidos
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(3): e200731, 2020 03 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32159811

RESUMO

Importance: Disparities in health insurance coverage by immigration status are well documented; however, there are few data comparing long-term changes in insurance coverage between immigrant and nonimmigrant adults as they age into older adulthood. Objective: To compare longitudinal changes in insurance coverage over 24 years of follow-up between recent immigrant, early immigrant, and nonimmigrant adults in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used data from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study. Data were collected biennially from 1992 to 2016. The population included community-dwelling US adults born between 1931 and 1941 and aged 51 to 61 years at baseline. Statistical analysis was performed from February 3, 2017, to January 10, 2020. Exposures: Participants were categorized as nonimmigrants (born in the US), early immigrants (immigrated to the US before the age of 18 years), and recent immigrants (immigrated to the US from the age of 18 years onward). Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported data on public, employer, long-term care, and other private insurance were used to define any insurance coverage. Longitudinal changes in insurance coverage were examined over time by immigration status using generalized estimating equations accounting for inverse probability of attrition weights. The association between immigration status and continuous insurance coverage was also evaluated. Results: A total of 9691 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 56.0 [3.2] years; 5111 [52.6%] female). Nonimmigrants composed 90% (n = 8649) of the cohort; early immigrants, 2% (n = 201); and recent immigrants, 8% (n = 841). Insurance coverage increased from 68%, 83%, and 86% of recent immigrant, early immigrant, and nonimmigrant older adults, respectively, in 1992 to 97%, 100%, and 99% in 2016. After accounting for selective attrition, recent immigrants were 15% less likely than nonimmigrants to have any insurance at baseline (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.88), driven by lower rates of private insurance. However, disparities in insurance decreased incrementally over time and were eliminated, such that insurance coverage rates were similar between groups as participants attained Medicare age eligibility. Furthermore, recent immigrants were less likely than nonimmigrants to be continuously insured (risk ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85-0.94). Conclusions and Relevance: Among community-dwelling adults who were not age eligible for Medicare, recent immigrants had lower rates of health insurance, but this disparity was eliminated over the 24-year follow-up period because of uptake of public insurance among all participants. Future studies should evaluate policies and health care reforms aimed at reducing disparities among vulnerable populations such as recent immigrants who are not age eligible for Medicare.


Assuntos
Emigração e Imigração , Seguro Saúde/tendências , Vigilância da População/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
11.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 16(7): e581-e589, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32069189

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The number of nonelderly cancer survivors is expected to grow and so are their health care costs. Many cancer survivors worry about medical bills. This study examined the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on the rate of insurance, average annual health care expenditure, and patient care experience among cancer survivors and investigated the patient characteristics that were associated with highly rated care experiences before and after ACA implementation. METHODS: The study is a cross-sectional analysis of adult, nonelderly cancer survivors in the 2011 and 2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey who completed health care experience questionnaires. Percent covered by insurance both before and after the ACA was calculated, including total out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses as a percentage of overall health care expenditure per patient. Regression was performed to determine characteristics associated with patient experience ratings. RESULTS: Health insurance coverage for cancer survivors was higher in 2016 than in 2011 (98.4% v 94.4%; P = .006). OOP spending as a percentage of health care expenditure among those with expenses decreased and was most striking in those with no insurance. Privately insured individuals were 3 times as likely to rate their care experience high compared with those with no insurance (odds ratio, 3.31; P < .0001). Those with above-average ratings of self-health and with few comorbidities rated their care experiences highly. CONCLUSION: After the ACA, OOP costs have decreased for all types of insurance coverage. The association between patient experience and health status warrants additional study to better manage and coordinate the care of such patients.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Neoplasias/terapia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estados Unidos
12.
J Surg Res ; 245: 136-144, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31419638

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of robotic surgery in colorectal cancer remains contentious with most data arising from small, single-institution studies. METHODS: Stage I-III colorectal cancer resections from 2008 to 2014 were identified in New York State. Propensity score-adjusted negative binomial models were used to compare cost and utilization between robotic, laparoscopic, and open resections. RESULTS: A total of 12,218 patients were identified. For colectomy, the robotic-to-open conversion rate was 3%, and the laparoscopic-to-open conversion rate was 13%. For rectal resection, the robotic-to-open conversion rate was 7% and the laparoscopic-to-open conversion rate was 32%. In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in cost across the surgical approaches, both in overall and stratified analyses. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches were associated with decreased 90-d hospital utilization compared with open surgery in intention-to-treat analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections were not associated with a hospital cost benefit after 90 d compared with open but were associated with decreased hospital utilization. Conversion to open resection was common, and efforts should be made to prevent them. Future research should continue to measure how robotic and laparoscopic approaches can add value to the health care system.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Colectomia/economia , Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Protectomia/economia , Protectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Retais/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia
13.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 46: 17-29, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28887243

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Conflicting literature exists regarding resource utilization for cardiovascular care when stratified by provider volume. This study investigates the differences in value of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair by high- and low-volume providers. The hypothesis of this study is that high-volume providers will provide superior value AAA repairs when compared to low-volume providers. METHODS: Using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database and its linked death database, patients undergoing intact open and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) were identified over a 10-year period. Charge data were normalized to year 2016 dollars and the data stratified by repair modality and annual surgeon volume. Univariate technique was used to compare the 2 groups over a 3-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Nine hundred eleven surgeons performed open AAA repairs and 615 performed EVAR. For both repair modalities, and despite a patient population with more vascular risk factors, the cumulative adjusted charge for all aneurysm-related care was significantly less for high-volume providers than low-volume providers. The calculated 3-year value-patient life years per cumulative charge-was also superior for high-volume providers compared to low-volume providers. This difference in charge and value persisted after propensity score matching for race, sex, insurance status, and common vascular comorbidities including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and a history of smoking. CONCLUSIONS: High-volume surgeons performing repair of aortic aneurysms provide superior value when compared to low-volume providers. The improved value margin is driven by both lower charge and improved survival, despite an increased incidence of cardiovascular comorbidities. This study adds support for the regionalization of care for patients with aortic aneurysm.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/economia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/economia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Preços Hospitalares , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/economia , Humanos , Masculino , New York , Pontuação de Propensão , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
J Vasc Surg ; 66(2): 476-487.e1, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28408154

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify relationships among geographic access to care, vascular procedure volume, limb preservation, and survival in patients diagnosed with critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: Using New York State administrative data from 2000 to 2013, we identified a patient's first presentation with CLI defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes. Distance from the patient's home to the index hospital was calculated using the centroids of the respective ZIP codes. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to estimate the impact of distance, major lower extremity amputation (LEA) volume, and lower extremity revascularization (LER) volume on major amputation and 30-day mortality. Volumes and distances were analyzed in quintiles. The farthest distance quintile and the highest procedure volume quintiles were used as references for generating odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: There were 49,576 patients identified with an initial presentation of CLI. The median age was 73 years, 35,829 (73.2%) had Medicare as a primary insurer, 11,395 (23.0%) had a major amputation, and 4249 (8.6%) died within 30 days of admission. Patients in the closest distance quintile were more likely to undergo amputation (OR, 1.53 [1.39-1.68]; P < .0001). Patients who visited hospitals in the lowest LER volume quintile with at least one procedure per year faced higher 30-day mortality rates (OR, 2.05 [1.67-2.50]; P < .0001) and greater odds of amputation (OR, 9.94 [8.5-11.63]; P < .0001). Patients who visited hospitals in the lowest LEA volume quintile had lower odds of 30-day mortality (OR, 0.66 [0.50-0.87]; P = .0033) and lower odds of amputation (OR, 0.180 [0.142-0.227]; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of major amputation are inversely associated with distance from the index hospital, whereas rates of both major amputation and mortality are inversely associated with LER volume. Rates of major amputation and mortality are directly associated with LEA volume. We believe that unless it is otherwise contraindicated, these data support consideration for selective referral of CLI patients to high-volume centers for LER regardless of distance. Within the context of value-based health care delivery, policy supporting regionalization of CLI care into centers of excellence may improve outcomes for these patients.


Assuntos
Área Programática de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos , Isquemia/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amputação Cirúrgica , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/mortalidade , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Salvamento de Membro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , New York , Razão de Chances , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Serviços Postais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade
15.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil ; 8(4): 208-214, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29318082

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Workers' compensation status is associated with poor outcomes after rotator cuff repair surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze a database of geriatric workers' compensation patients after surgical repair of the rotator cuff and identify both medical and nonmedical patient factors that influence the time it takes for them to return to work at full duty, including a comparison of arthroscopic and open techniques. METHODS: An all workers' compensation database was queried for rotator cuff claims that were surgically managed using arthroscopic, open, or both approaches from 2003 to 2013 in patients aged ≥60. Primary outcomes were the number of days for return to full work (RTW) following surgery and the total reimbursement for health care. Multivariate analysis was performed, and data are presented as average ± standard deviation. RESULTS: The database yielded 1903 claims for surgically treated rotator cuff conditions (arthroscopic n = 935; open n = 926; both n = 42). In multivariate RTW analyses, we did not find a significant difference between groups (RTW in days was 153 ± 134 for arthroscopy [P = .81], 160 ± 160 for open [Ref], and 140 ± 82 days for both [P = .75]). However, multivariate analysis of reimbursement claims found arthroscopic surgery claims to be 13% higher compared to claims for open surgery only (US $29 986 ± 16 259 for arthroscopy vs US $26 495 ± 13 186 for open, P < .001). Patients aged ≥65 had more medical expenses than patients aged 60 to 64 (P = .03). Potentially modifiable variables that significantly prolonged RTW timing and higher health-care claims included need for vocational rehabilitation services and filing of a legal suit. CONCLUSIONS: Return to full-duty work in geriatric workers' compensation patients after rotator cuff repair takes about 5 months regardless of surgical approach and costs significantly more in patients aged ≥65. Arthroscopic repairs generated 13% more cumulative health-care costs than open surgery alone. More efficient vocational rehabilitation services and minimizing legal suits may help get patients back to work sooner and reduce overall costs.

16.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(Suppl 5): 674-683, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27613558

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about between-hospital differences in the rate of suboptimal lymphadenectomy. This study characterizes variation in hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy and its effect on overall survival in a national hospital-based registry. METHODS: Stage I-III colon cancer patients were identified from the 2003-2012 National Cancer Data Base. Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of patient- and hospital-level factors on hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy (<12 lymph nodes), and multilevel Cox models were used to estimate the effect of suboptimal lymphadenectomy at the patient (yes vs. no) and hospital level (quartiles of hospital-specific rates) on overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 360,846 patients across 1345 hospitals in the US met the inclusion criteria, of which 25 % had a suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Wide variation was observed in hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy (range 0-82 %, median 44 %). Older age, male sex, comorbidity score, no insurance, positive margins, lower tumor grade, lower T and N stage, and sigmoid and left colectomy were associated with higher odds of suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Patients treated at lower-volume and non-academic hospitals had higher odds of suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Patient- and hospital-level factors explained 5 % of the between-hospital variability in suboptimal lymphadenectomy, leaving 95 % unexplained. Higher suboptimal lymphadenectomy rates were associated with worse survival (quartile 4 vs. quartile 1: hazard ratio 1.19, 95 % confidence interval 1.16-1.22). CONCLUSION: Large differences in hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy were observed, and this variation was associated with survival. Quality improvement initiatives targeting hospital-level adherence to the national standard may improve overall survival among resected colon cancer patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Excisão de Linfonodo/estatística & dados numéricos , Excisão de Linfonodo/normas , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colo Descendente/cirurgia , Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Hospitais de Ensino/normas , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Fatores Sexuais , Taxa de Sobrevida
17.
Ann Surg ; 264(3): 437-47, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27433901

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a primary medical versus surgical service on healthcare utilization and outcomes for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) admissions. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Adhesive-SBO typically requires hospital admission and is associated with high healthcare utilization and costs. Given that most patients are managed nonoperatively, many patients are admitted to medical hospitalists. However, comparisons of outcomes between primary medical and surgical services have been limited to small single-institution studies. METHODS: Unscheduled adhesive-SBO admissions in NY State from 2002 to 2013 were identified using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Bivariate and mixed-effects regression analyses were performed assessing factors associated with healthcare utilization and outcomes for SBO admissions. RESULTS: Among 107,603 admissions for adhesive-SBO (78% nonoperative, 22% operative), 43% were primarily managed by a medical attending and 57% were managed by a surgical attending. After controlling for patient, physician, and hospital-level factors, management by a medical service was independently associated with longer length of stay [IRR = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.24, 1.56], greater inpatient costs (IRR = 1.38, 95% = 1.21, 1.57), and a higher rate of 30-day readmission (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.22, 1.42) following nonoperative management. Similarly, of those managed operatively, management by a medicine service was associated with a delay in time to surgical intervention (IRR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.69, 2.01), extended length of stay (IRR=1.36, 95% CI = 1.25, 1.49), greater inpatient costs (IRR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.71), and higher rates of 30-day mortality (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.50, 2.47) and 30-day readmission (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.97, 1.32). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that management of patients presenting with adhesive-SBO by a primary medical team is associated with higher healthcare utilization and worse perioperative outcomes. Policies favoring primary management by a surgical service may improve outcomes and reduce costs for patients admitted with adhesive-SBO.


Assuntos
Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Intestino Delgado , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Obstrução Intestinal/economia , Obstrução Intestinal/terapia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Design de Software , Aderências Teciduais , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 25(7): 1115-21, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27066964

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed workers' compensation patients after surgical or nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures to identify factors that influence the time for return to work and total health care reimbursement claims. We hypothesized that return to work for operative patients would be faster. METHODS: The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to retrospectively query the Workers' Compensation national database. The outcomes of interest were the number of days for return to full work after surgery and total reimbursement for health care-related claims. The primary independent variable was treatment modality. RESULTS: There were 169 claims for clavicle fractures within the database (surgical, n = 34; nonoperative, n = 135). The average health care claims reimbursed were $29,136 ± $26,998 for surgical management compared with $8366 ± $14,758 for nonoperative management (P < .001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between surgical (196 ± 287 days) and nonoperative (69 ± 94 days) treatment groups in their time to return to work (P = .06); however, there was high variability in both groups. Litigation was an independent predictor of prolonged return to work (P = .007) and higher health care costs (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Workers' compensation patients treated for clavicle fractures return to work at roughly the same time whether they are treated surgically or nonoperatively, with surgery being roughly 3 times more expensive. There was a substantial amount of variability in return to work timing by subjects in both groups. Litigation was a predictor of longer return to work timing and higher health care costs.


Assuntos
Clavícula/lesões , Fraturas Ósseas/economia , Fraturas Ósseas/terapia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Retorno ao Trabalho , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/economia , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/legislação & jurisprudência
19.
Telemed J E Health ; 22(3): 251-8, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26252866

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The failure to provide timely acute illness care can lead to adverse consequences or emergency department (ED) use. We evaluated the effect on ED use of a high-intensity telemedicine program that provides acute illness care for senior living community (SLC) residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study over 3.5 years. Six SLCs cared for by a primary care geriatrics practice were intervention facilities, with the remaining 16 being controls. Consenting patients at intervention facilities could access telemedicine for acute illness care. Patients were provided patient-to-provider, real-time, or store-and-forward high-intensity telemedicine (i.e., technician-assisted with resources beyond simple videoconferencing) to diagnose and treat acute illnesses. The primary outcome was the rate of ED use. RESULTS: We enrolled 494 of 705 (70.1%) subjects/proxies in the intervention group; 1,058 subjects served as controls. Control and intervention subjects visited the ED 2,238 and 725 times, respectively, with 47.3% of control and 43.4% of intervention group visits resulting in discharge home. Among intervention subjects, ED use decreased at an annualized rate of 18% (rate ratio [RR]=0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.95), whereas in the control group there was no statistically significant change in ED use (RR=1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.07; p=0.009 for group-by-time interaction). Primary care use and mortality were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity telemedicine significantly reduced ED use among SLC residents without increasing other utilization or mortality. This alternative to traditional acute illness care can enhance access to acute illness care and should be integrated into population health programs.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos , Vida Independente , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Redução de Custos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
20.
J Orthop Trauma ; 30(5): 262-8, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670287

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This comparative effectiveness study sought to determine the impact of complications, readmission, and procedure choice on in-hospital and total 90-day costs for surgical management of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: Medicare claims data from the Upstate New York area (2008-2009) were evaluated. The study included all patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture identified by ICD-9 codes. The primary end points included in-hospital costs and total health care costs within 90 days after the index operation. Multivariable generalized linear models with negative binomial distributions and log link function were used for cost analysis. RESULTS: ORIF was performed in 52 cases and hemiarthroplasty in 57 cases, total n = 109. On univariate analysis, readmission increased in-hospital cost by $54,345 and total 90-day costs by $63,104, whereas complications increased in-hospital cost by $23,300 and total 90-day costs by $30,237. On multivariable analysis, ORIF was associated with 29% lower in-hospital cost compared with hemiarthroplasty [Odds Ratio 0.71; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.54-0.92; P = 0.01], and readmission was associated with a 5.68-fold in-hospital cost increase (Odds Ratio 5.68; CI, 3.57-9.03; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Complications and hospital readmission continue to drive cost upward underscoring the need for best practice. The acute inpatient period costs may be decreased with ORIF in appropriately selected patients with proximal humerus fractures in comparison with hemiarthroplasty. This study provides real world cost estimates with the cost implications of complications, readmissions, and procedure choice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part A/economia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Fraturas do Ombro/economia , Fraturas do Ombro/cirurgia , Idoso , Simulação por Computador , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/economia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemiartroplastia/economia , Hemiartroplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare Part A/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Econômicos , New York/epidemiologia , Redução Aberta/economia , Redução Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fraturas do Ombro/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA