Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Lancet ; 389(10088): 2503-2513, 2017 Jun 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28495109

RESUMO

Starting well before Independence in 1948, and over the ensuing six decades, Israel has built a robust, relatively efficient public system of health care, resulting in good health statistics throughout the life course. Because of the initiative of people living under the British Mandate for Palestine (1922-48), the development of many of today's health services predated the state's establishment by several decades. An extensive array of high-quality services and technologies is available to all residents, largely free at point of service, via the promulgation of the 1994 National Health Insurance Law. In addition to a strong medical academic culture, well equipped (albeit crowded) hospitals, and a robust primary-care infrastructure, the country has also developed some model national projects such as a programme for community quality indicators, an annual update of the national basket of services, and a strong system of research and education. Challenges include increasing privatisation of what was once largely a public system, and the underfunding in various sectors resulting in, among other challenges, relatively few acute hospital beds. Despite substantial organisational and financial investment, disparities persist based on ethnic origin or religion, other socioeconomic factors, and, regardless of the country's small size, a geographic maldistribution of resources. The Ministry of Health continues to be involved in the ownership and administration of many general hospitals and the direct payment for some health services (eg, geriatric institutional care), activities that distract it from its main task of planning for and supervising the whole health structure. Although the health-care system itself is very well integrated in relation to the country's two main ethnic groups (Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews), we think that health in its widest sense might help provide a bridge to peace and reconciliation between the country and its neighbours.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acreditação/estatística & dados numéricos , Governança Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção à Saúde/história , Demografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Emigração e Imigração/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde , Serviços de Saúde/história , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Israel , Expectativa de Vida , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/história , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/história , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Setor Privado/organização & administração , Setor Privado/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/organização & administração , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 150(7): 493-5, 2009 Apr 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19258550

RESUMO

The coverage, cost, and quality problems of the U.S. health care system are evident. Sustainable health care reform must go beyond financing expanded access to care to substantially changing the organization and delivery of care. The FRESH-Thinking Project (www.fresh-thinking.org) held a series of workshops during which physicians, health policy experts, health insurance executives, business leaders, hospital administrators, economists, and others who represent diverse perspectives came together. This group agreed that the following 8 recommendations are fundamental to successful reform: 1. Replace the current fee-for-service payment system with a payment system that encourages and rewards innovation in the efficient delivery of quality care. The new payment system should invest in the development of outcome measures to guide payment. 2. Establish a securely funded, independent agency to sponsor and evaluate research on the comparative effectiveness of drugs, devices, and other medical interventions. 3. Simplify and rationalize federal and state laws and regulations to facilitate organizational innovation, support care coordination, and streamline financial and administrative functions. 4. Develop a health information technology infrastructure with national standards of interoperability to promote data exchange. 5. Create a national health database with the participation of all payers, delivery systems, and others who own health care data. Agree on methods to make de-identified information from this database on clinical interventions, patient outcomes, and costs available to researchers. 6. Identify revenue sources, including a cap on the tax exclusion of employer-based health insurance, to subsidize health care coverage with the goal of insuring all Americans. 7. Create state or regional insurance exchanges to pool risk, so that Americans without access to employer-based or other group insurance could obtain a standard benefits package through these exchanges. Employers should also be allowed to participate in these exchanges for their employees' coverage. 8. Create a health coverage board with broad stakeholder representation to determine and periodically update the affordable standard benefit package available through state or regional insurance exchanges.


Assuntos
Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/organização & administração , Regulamentação Governamental , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Gestão da Qualidade Total/economia , Estados Unidos , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA