Significant Cost Savings and Improved Early Clinical Outcomes in Medicare Patients Utilizing a Clinician-Controlled Telerehabilitation System Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The costs and benefits of different rehabilitation protocols following total knee arthroplasty are unclear. The emergence of telerehabilitation has introduced the potential for enhanced patient convenience and cost reduction. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost difference between standard physical therapy (SPT) and a telerehabilitation home-based clinician-controlled therapy system (HCTS). METHODS: A prospectively enrolled, consecutive series of 109 Medicare patients who received SPT were compared to 101 Medicare patients who were treated with a HCTS. The analysis focused on total rehabilitation costs and the assessment of outcome measures: knee range of motion, visual analog scale pain levels, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement. RESULTS: The HCTS group demonstrated not only statistically significantly lower average costs but also faster and sustained knee range of motion improvements. Furthermore, in comparison to SPT, the HCTS group exhibited superior visual analog scale pain scores and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement functional scores at all assessment points postoperatively, which were statistically significant (all P < .001) and surpassed the minimal clinically important difference thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: The HCTS used in this study exhibited a remarkable cost-saving advantage of $2,460 per patient compared to standard therapy. As approximately 500,000 primary total knee arthroplasties in the United States are covered by Medicare annually, a switch to HCTS could yield total cost savings of more than $1.23 billion per year for our taxpayer-funded health care system. Furthermore, the HCTS cohort demonstrated superior functional outcomes and improved pain scores across all assessment time points, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference.

Telemedicine for patients undergoing arthroplasty : access, ability, and preference.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine the access to and ability to use telemedicine technology in adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine associations with the socioeconomic characteristics of the patients, including age, sex, race, and education. We also sought to understand the patients' perceived benefits, risks, and preferences when dealing with telemedicine. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey involving patients awaiting primary THA and TKA by one of six surgeons at a single academic institution. Patients were included and called for a telephone-administered survey if their surgery was scheduled to be between 23 March and 2 June 2020, and were aged > 18 years. RESULTS: The response rate was 52% (189 of 363 patients). A total of 170 patients (90.4%) reported using the internet, 177 (94.1%) reported owning a device capable of videoconferencing, and 143 (76.1%) had participated in a video call in the past year. When asked for their preferred method for a consultation, 155 (82.8%) and 26 (13.9%) ranked in-person and a videoconference as their first choice, respectively. The perceived benefits of telemedicine consultations included reduced travel to appointments (165 (88.2%) agreed) and reduced cost of attending appointments (123 (65.8%) agreed). However, patients were concerned that they would not establish the same patient-physician connection (100 (53.8%) agreed), and would not receive the same level of care (52 (33.2%) agreed) using telemedicine consultations compared with in-person consultations. CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing arthroplasty have access to and are capable of using the technology required for telemedicine consultations. However, they still prefer in-person consultations due to concerns that they will not establish the same patient-physician connection and will not receive the same level of care, despite the benefits of reducing the time spent in travelling and the cost of attending appointments, and the appointments being easier to attend. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):98-102.

Patient Attitudes Toward Resident and Fellow Participation in Orthopedic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Residents' and fellows' participation in orthopedic surgery is a potential source of anxiety and concern for patients. The purpose of this study was to determine patients' attitudes toward trainee involvement in orthopedic surgery, surgeons as educators, and disclosure of trainee involvement. METHODS: Three hundred two consecutive patients with preoperative and postoperative appointments at three arthroplasty practices in academic medical centers were surveyed with an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed in consultation with an expert in survey design. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-four patients completed the questionnaire (response rate 77.5%). Respondents were 60.5% female, 79.6% white, 66.5% privately insured, and 82.8% had at least some college education. About 65.9% of the respondents felt that surgeons who teach are better surgeons. Nearly all felt residents and fellows should perform surgeries as part of their education (94.1% and 95.3%, respectively). However, 39.7% of the respondents were not satisfactory with a second-year resident assisting in their own surgery. Patients dissatisfied with their most recent orthopedic surgery were more likely to respond that they did not want residents helping with their surgery. Respondents agreed that resident or fellow involvement in surgery should be disclosed (92.2% and 90.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Insured and educated patients in the United States overwhelmingly desire disclosure of trainee involvement in their surgery. To address the need for orthopedic training in the context of a patient population that is not fully comfortable with trainee involvement in their own surgery, an open discussion between patients and surgeons regarding trainees' roles may be the best course of action.

It's a Brave New World: Alternative Payment Models and Value Creation in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Alternative payment models are constantly evolving in an attempt to create value by decreasing cost while improving or maintaining quality. The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative was implemented in 2011, and many institutions have seen early success by using the seven pillars of total joint arthroplasty episode management. Private insurers have seen improvements in care and cost savings by adopting private bundle programs. In each organization, alignment among all stakeholders is paramount to the success of the bundled payment programs. Gainsharing offers a unique opportunity to incentivize physicians to change their care practices in an attempt to reduce costs and improve outcomes. As bundled payments evolve, the cooperation of physicians, health care institutions, payers, and patients will lead to value creation for all stakeholders.

Patient Perceptions of Home Health Care Services After Total Joint Replacement.

Value-based payment programs have incentivized the reduction of many post-acute care services, including home health care. Patient perceptions of home health care services are currently unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine the value that patients place on home health care after joint replacement surgery and to assess their impression of Medicare reimbursement for these services. Patients with traditional Medicare insurance who underwent primary total hip or knee arthroplasty between January 2016 and July 2017 were given a questionnaire in which they were asked to quantify their satisfaction with home health care, estimate Medicare reimbursement for these services, and give their impression of actual reimbursement. One hundred sixtythree patients completed the questionnaire. Patients were generally satisfied with the services received, giving an overall mean ranking of 9.3 (range, 1-10). Respondent estimates of the cost of home health care services ranged from $0 to $300,000 (average, $8067). Ninety-three percent of patients would choose home health care again if they were to undergo another joint replacement. Patients in this study placed significant value on home health care services after total hip and knee replacement surgery. Further consideration of patient satisfaction may be warranted prior to eliminating home health care services following total joint arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e713-e717.].

Skilled Nursing Facility Star Rating, Patient Outcomes, and Readmission Risk After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the correlation between publicly reported indicators of skilled nursing facility (SNF) quality and clinical outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: This retrospective analysis used Medicare claims from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 100% Standard Analytic File (2014-2015) that were linked to SNF quality star ratings from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Nursing Home Compare database. Overall SNF rating and subcomponents of the rating were evaluated for correlation to 30-day and 90-day risk of readmission. Ratings were based upon a 5-star rating system (1 representing the lowest quality). Cox proportional hazards regressions controlled for age, race, census division, hospital location, comorbidities, and SNF length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 9418 SNFs, 58,064 TKA patients, and 26,837 THA patients met criteria. As SNF overall star rating increased from 1 to 5, incidence of all-cause 30-day readmission decreased from 6.4% to 5.0% for TKA (relative reduction [RR] 22%; P < .001) and from 9.1% to 6.2% for THA (RR 32%; P < .001). As nurse staffing rating increased, incidence of all-cause readmission decreased from 6.8% to 4.7% for the TKA cohort (30.9% RR; P < .001), and from 7.7% to 6.0% for the THA cohort (22.1% RR; P = .003). Regression analysis demonstrated that a higher star rating was associated with decreased risk of readmission (both cohorts P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing TKA or THA, the overall SNF star rating, nurse staffing ratios, and physical therapy intensity were significantly correlated with risk of readmission within 30 days of SNF admission.

Gainsharing Strategies, Physician Champions, Getting Physician Buy In.

As healthcare spending continues to outpace economic growth, legislators and healthcare economists have explored many processes aimed at improving efficiency and reducing waste. Gainsharing or the general concept that organizations and their employees can work together to continually improve outcomes at reduced expenditures in exchange for a portion of the savings has been shown to be effective within the healthcare system. Although gainsharing principles may be applicable to healthcare organizations and their physician partners, specific parameters should be followed when implementing these arrangements. This article will discuss 10 gainsharing strategies aimed at properly aligning healthcare organizations and physicians, which if followed will ensure the successful implementation of gainsharing initiatives.

Clinical Outcomes and 90-Day Costs Following Hemiarthroplasty or Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Fracture.

BACKGROUND: In the era of bundled payments, many hospitals are responsible for costs from admission through 90 days postdischarge. Although bundled episodes for hip fracture will have a separate target price for the bundle, little is known about the 90-day resource use burden for this patient population. METHODS: Using Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files (2010-2014), we identified patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients were aged 65 and older with admitting diagnosis of closed hip fracture, no concurrent fractures of the lower limb, and no history of hip surgery in the prior 12 months baseline. Continuous Medicare-only enrollment was required. Complications, resource use, and mortality from admission through 90 days following discharge (follow-up) were summarized. RESULTS: Four cohorts met selection criteria for analysis: (1) hemiarthroplasty diagnosis-related group (DRG) 469 (N = 19,634), (2) hemiarthroplasty DRG 470 (N = 77,744), (3) THA DRG 469 (N = 1686), and (4) THA DRG 470 (N = 9314). All-cause mortality during the study period was 51.6%, 29.5%, 48.1%, and 24.9% with mean 90-day costs of $28,952, $19,243, $29,763, and $18,561, respectively. Most of the patients waited 1 day from admission to surgery (41%-51%). Incidence of an all-cause complication was approximately 70% in each DRG 469 cohort and 14%-16% in each DRG 470 cohort. CONCLUSION: This study confirms patients with hip fracture are a costly subpopulation. Tailored care pathways to minimize post-acute care resource use are warranted for these patients.

Decreased Hospital Costs and Surgical Site Infection Incidence With a Universal Decolonization Protocol in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus colonization has been identified as a key modifiable risk factor in the reduction of surgical site infections (SSI) related to elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We investigated the incidence of SSIs and cost-effectiveness of a universal decolonization protocol without screening consisting of nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine before elective TJA compared to a program in which all subjects were screened for S aureus and selectively treated if positive. METHODS: We reviewed 4186 primary TJAs from March 2011 through July 2015. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on the decolonization regimen used. Before May 2013, 1981 TJA patients were treated under a "screen and treat" program while the subsequent 2205 patients were treated under the universal protocol. We excluded the 3 months around the transition to control for treatment bias. Outcomes of interest included SSI and total hospital costs. RESULTS: With a universal decolonization protocol, there was a significant decrease in both the overall SSI rate (5 vs 15 cases; 0.2% vs 0.8%; P = .013) and SSIs caused by S aureus organisms (2 vs 10; 0.09% vs 0.5%; P = .01). A cost analysis accounting for the cost to administer the universal regimen demonstrated an actual savings of $717,205.59. TJA complicated by SSI costs 4.6× more to treat than that of an uncomplicated primary TJA. CONCLUSION: Our universal decolonization paradigm for elective TJA is effective in reducing the overall rate of SSIs and promoting economic gains for the health system related to the downstream savings accrued from limiting future reoperations and hospitalizations.

Is Physician Quality Reporting System Worth the Cost to Report to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services?

BACKGROUND: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed a move to payment based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and failure to report on PROs will result in a penalty of 2% in 2016. However, the cost to the physician to collect PROs is not known. METHODS: Using data from the 2013 Medical Group Management Association Compensation and Financial survey and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement, a calculation was performed to determine the cost to the physician to report on PROs for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Using Medical Group Management Association and Medicare fee for service rates, calculations were performed based on an annual volume of 200 Medicare operative cases (125 total knee arthroplasties, 75 total hip arthroplasties) with 1000 new patients (level 4) and 2000 established patients (level 3) visits. A range of start-up and annual costs necessary to collect PROs including hardware, software, and personnel costs was calculated and then compared with the calculated 2% Medicare penalty for failing to report PROs in 2016. RESULTS: The cost to collect PROs ranged from $47,973 to $56,288 which far outweighed the penalty of $2954 in 2016 for failing to report these measures. CONCLUSION: With the move toward requiring surgeons to report PROs for reimbursement, the current financial model would prove to be cost prohibitive and the incentive to report PROs might be too costly to gain wide acceptance.

Patient Attitudes Toward Orthopedic Surgeon Ownership of Related Ancillary Businesses.

BACKGROUND: Physician ownership of businesses related to orthopedic surgery, such as surgery centers, has been criticized as potentially leading to misuse of health care resources. The purpose of this study was to determine patients' attitudes toward surgeon ownership of orthopedic-related businesses. METHODS: We surveyed 280 consecutive patients at 2 centers regarding their attitudes toward surgeon ownership of orthopedic-related businesses using an anonymous questionnaire. Three surgeon ownership scenarios were presented: (1) owning a surgery center, (2) physical therapy (PT), and (3) imaging facilities (eg, Magnetic Resonance Imaging scanner). RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients (76%) completed the questionnaire. The majority agreed that it is ethical for a surgeon to own a surgery center (73%), PT practice (77%), or imaging facility (77%). Most (>67%) indicated that their surgeon owning such a business would have no effect on the trust they have in their surgeon. Although >70% agreed that a surgeon in all 3 scenarios would make the same treatment decisions, many agreed that such surgeons might perform more surgery (47%), refer more patients to PT (61%), or order more imaging (58%). Patients favored surgeon autonomy, however, believing that surgeons should be allowed to own such businesses (78%). Eighty-five percent agreed that patients should be informed if their surgeon owns an orthopedic-related business. CONCLUSION: Although patients express concern over and desire disclosure of surgeon ownership of orthopedic-related businesses, the majority believes that it is an ethical practice and feel comfortable receiving care at such a facility.

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged CMS Beneficiaries Do Not Benefit From the Readmission Reduction Initiatives.

We assessed the impact of minority and socioeconomic status on 30-day readmission rates after 3825 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 3118 primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. Minority patients had higher THA (7.4% vs 3.2%, P=0.001) and TKA (5.4% vs 3.7%, P<0.001) readmission rates. Low socioeconomic status was associated with higher THA (6.0% vs 3.1%, P<0.001) and TKA (6.3% vs 3.8%, P=0.02) readmission rates. Risk reduction initiatives were effective after TKA, but minority status and low socioeconomic status were still associated with higher 30-day readmission rates (4.6% vs 1.8%, P<0.01). Focused postoperative engagement for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) beneficiaries less than 65 years of age may help reduce complications and 30-day readmissions.

Are Financial Conflicts of Interest for the Surgeon A Source of Concern for the Patient?

We surveyed 269 consecutive patients (81% response rate) with an anonymous questionnaire to assess their attitudes toward conflicts-of-interest (COIs) resulting from three financial relationships between orthopedic surgeons and orthopedic industry: (1) being paid as a consultant; (2) receiving research funding; (3) receiving product design royalties. The majority perceived these relationships favorably, with 75% agreeing that surgeons in such relationships are top experts in the field and two-thirds agreeing that surgeons engage in such relationships to serve patients better. Patients viewed surgeons who designed products more favorably than those who are consultants (P=0.03). The majority (74%) agreed that these COIs should be disclosed to patients. Given patients' desires for disclosure and their favorable perceptions of these relationships, open discussions about financial COIs is appropriate.

The Impact of Risk Reduction Initiatives on Readmission: THA and TKA Readmission Rates.

We assessed whether sequential incorporation of initiatives to decrease postoperative surgical complications were similarly effective in reducing 30-day readmission rates following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Readmission rates following TKA decreased substantially (5.6% vs. 3.0%, P<0.001), but readmissions following THA (4.0% vs. 3.4%, P=0.41) were not significantly reduced. The greatest impact of the multimodal treatment approach was a reduction of surgically related TKA complications. Advanced medical disease, facility discharge status, and Medicare or Medicaid coverage contributed to the highest risk for 30-day readmission after THA. Risk models defining expected readmission rates should account for these factors to avoid penalizing hospitals that provide higher proportional care to Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) beneficiaries.

New total knee arthroplasty designs: do young patients notice?

BACKGROUND: Although the volume of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed in the United States continues to increase, recent reports have shown the percentage of patients who remain "unsatisfied" is as high as 15% to 30%. Recently, several newer implant designs have been developed to potentially improve patient outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of high-flex, gender-specific, and rotating-platform TKA designs on patient satisfaction and functional outcomes. METHODS: A four-center study was designed to quantify the degree of residual symptoms and functional deficits in patients undergoing TKA with newer implant designs compared with a 10-year-old, cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA system introduced in 2003. Each contributing surgeon was fellowship-trained and specialized in joint replacement surgery. Only patients younger than 60 years old were included. Data were collected by an independent, third-party survey center blinded to the implant type, who administered questionnaires about patient satisfaction, residual symptoms, function, and pre- and postoperative activity levels using previously published survey instruments. Two hundred thirty-seven CR, 137 rotating-platform, 88 gender-specific, and 65 high-flex TKAs were included in the analysis. Differences in baseline demographic variables were accounted for using multiple logistic regression statistical analyses. RESULTS: Patients who received certain newer designs reported more residual symptoms (grinding, popping, and clicking) in the 30 days before survey administration than the group receiving a 10-year-old CR design (CR, 24% [57 of 237 patients] versus gender-specific, 36% [32 of 88 patients]; odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.8; p=0.03; and rotating-platform, 43% [59 of 137 patients]; OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7; p<0.001). They also reported more functional problems, including getting in and out of a chair (CR, 19% [46 of 237 patients] versus gender-specific, 37% [32 of 88 patients]; OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5; p=0.001). Patients with newer TKA designs did not demonstrate any improvements in function or patient satisfaction versus those who received the 10-year-old CR design. CONCLUSIONS: When interviewed by an independent, blinded third party, the use of newer implant designs did not improve patient satisfaction and the presence of residual symptoms when compared with patients who received the 10-year-old CR design. Future studies should prospectively determine whether the purported benefits of newer implant designs improve patient-perceived outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Economic evaluation of access to musculoskeletal care: the case of waiting for total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The projected demand for total knee arthroplasty is staggering. At its root, the solution involves increasing supply or decreasing demand. Other developed nations have used rationing and wait times to distribute this service. However, economic impact and cost-effectiveness of waiting for TKA is unknown. METHODS: A Markov decision model was constructed for a cost-utility analysis of three treatment strategies for end-stage knee osteoarthritis: 1) TKA without delay, 2) a waiting period with no non-operative treatment and 3) a non-operative treatment bridge during that waiting period in a cohort of 60 year-old patients. Outcome probabilities and effectiveness were derived from the literature. Costs were estimated from the societal perspective with national average Medicare reimbursement. Effectiveness was expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Principal outcome measures were average incremental costs, effectiveness, and quality-adjusted life years; and net health benefits. RESULTS: In the base case, a 2-year wait-time both with and without a non-operative treatment bridge resulted in a lower number of average QALYs gained (11.57 (no bridge) and 11.95 (bridge) vs. 12.14 (no delay). The average cost was $1,660 higher for TKA without delay than wait-time with no bridge, but $1,810 less than wait-time with non-operative bridge. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing wait-time with no bridge to TKA without delay was $2,901/QALY. When comparing TKA without delay to waiting with non-operative bridge, TKA without delay produced greater utility at a lower cost to society. CONCLUSIONS: TKA without delay is the preferred cost-effective treatment strategy when compared to a waiting for TKA without non-operative bridge. TKA without delay is cost saving when a non-operative bridge is used during the waiting period. As it is unlikely that patients waiting for TKA would not receive non-operative treatment, TKA without delay may be an overall cost-saving health care delivery strategy. Policies aimed at increasing the supply of TKA should be considered as savings exist that could indirectly fund those strategies.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: poor cost utility for treatment of adult patients with hip pain.

BACKGROUND: Although MRI is frequently used to diagnose conditions affecting the hip, its cost-effectiveness has not been defined. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed this retrospective study to determine for patients 40 to 80 years old: (1) the differences in hip MRI indications between orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic practitioners; (2) the clinical indications that most commonly influence treatment decisions; (3) the likelihood that hip MRI influences treatment decisions separate from plain radiographs; and (4) the cost of obtaining hip MRI studies that influence treatment decisions (impact studies). METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 218 consecutive hip MRI studies (213 patients) at one institution over a 5-year interval. Medical records, plain radiographs, and MRI studies were reviewed to determine how frequently individual MRI findings determined treatment recommendations (impact study). The cost estimate of an impact study was calculated from the product of institutional MRI unit cost (USD 436) and the proportion of impact studies relative to all studies obtained either for a specific indication or by an orthopaedic/nonorthopaedic clinician. RESULTS: Nonorthopaedic clinicians more frequently ordered hip MRI without a clinical diagnosis (72% versus 30%, p < 0.01), before plain radiographs (29% versus 3%, p < 0.001), and with less frequent impact on treatment (6% versus 15%, p < 0.05). Hip MRI most frequently influenced treatment when assessing for a tumor (58%, p < 0.001) or infection (40%, p < 0.001) and least frequently when assessing for pain (1%, p < 0.002). Hip MRI impacted a treatment decision independent of plain radiographic findings in only 7% of studies (3% surgical, 4% nonsurgical). Hip MRI cost was least when assessing for a neoplasm (USD 750) and greatest when assessing undefined hip pain (USD 59,000). The cost of obtaining an impact study was also less when the ordering clinician was an orthopaedic clinician (USD 2800) than a nonorthopaedic clinician (USD 7800). CONCLUSIONS: Although MRI can be valuable for diagnosing or staging specific conditions, it is not cost-effective as a screening tool for hip pain that is not supported by history, clinical examination, and plain radiographic findings in patients between 40 and 80 years of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, economic and decision analysis study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Readmission following total knee arthroplasty: venous thromboembolism as a "never event" is a counterproductive misnomer.

A national quality improvement initiative identifies certain avoidable complications as "never events," and includes venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study examines the incidence and cost of VTE following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to other causes of readmission and the degree to which VTE was preventable. One hundred twenty-one readmissions (105 patients) were reviewed to determine the reason for readmission, cost, and compliance with SCIP VTE prophylaxis guidelines. The most common reasons for readmission were limited motion (18.2%), wound complication (14%), surgical site infection (9.9%), and bleeding (9.9%). VTE was less common (3.3%), and all occurred despite adequate prophylaxis. The cost of bleeding, wound complications, infection, and limited motion each exceeded the cost of VTE. These results challenge the identification of VTE as a "never event."

Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Using patient-specific cutting blocks for TKA increases the cost to the hospital for these procedures, but it has been proposed they may reduce operative times and improve implant alignment, which could reduce the need for revision surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared TKAs performed with patient-specific cutting blocks with those performed with traditional instrumentation to determine whether there was improved operating room time management and component coronal alignment to support use of this technology. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 57 patients undergoing primary TKAs using patient-specific custom cutting blocks for osteoarthritis and compared them with 57 matched patients undergoing TKAs with traditional instrumentation during the same period (January 2009 to September 2010). At baseline, the groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, and BMI. We collected data on operative time (total in-room time and tourniquet time) and measured component alignment on plain radiographs. RESULTS: On average, TKAs performed with patient-specific instrumentation had similar tourniquet times (61.0 versus 56.2 minutes) but patients were in the operating room 12.1 minutes less (137.2 versus 125.1 minutes) than those in the standard instrumentation group. We observed no difference in the femorotibial angle in the coronal plane between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific instrumentation for TKA shows slight improvement in operating room time management but none in component alignment postoperatively. Therefore, routine use of this new technology may not be cost-effective in its current form. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.