Anesthesia Lost in Translation: Perspective and Comprehension.

BACKGROUND: Care of non-English speaking patients poses a unique challenge to the anesthesiologist in the perioperative setting. Communication limitations can be frustrating to both the patient and provider, and at times can compromise the quality of care, resulting in health care disparities. An often overlooked, but critical component is the interaction between the anesthesia provider and the interpreter. The goal of our study was to identify misconceptions regarding anesthesia and determine common knowledge gaps amongst medical interpreters. METHODS: A survey inquiring about past perioperative experiences, level of training, and barriers to effective communication was sent to the Department of Interpreter Services (IS). Concurrently, a survey was sent to the Department of Anesthesia, about their experiences with interpreters in the perioperative setting. RESULTS: Our survey had 29 respondents from IS and 42 respondents from Anesthesia. 85% of interpreters had >5 years experience, but 96% denied having anesthesia specific training. Additionally, 42.5% of our interpreters felt that less than half of their patients were sufficiently literate to read and consent in their native language. Anesthesia providers were primarily concerned about the fidelity of the interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Misunderstanding one another's field appears to play a significant role in the communication issues surrounding interpretation for anesthesia. Educating both departments may prove beneficial to resolving misconceptions, improving perioperative interactions and ultimately improving patient care. Based on the gathered information, a continuing education lecture was created by the Anesthesia Department in order to improve our interpreters' understanding of anesthesia, associated procedures and vocabulary.

Spiral gradient endpoint susceptibility testing: a fresh look at a neglected technique.

OBJECTIVES: Increasing antibiotic resistance and interest in matching antibiotic therapy with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of isolates has led to increasing demands for determination of MICs. This can lead to increased costs for the laboratory. The spiral gradient endpoint (SGE) technique, a low-cost method of MIC determination, was developed some years ago. Although the technique showed good correlation with reference methods, it was not widely employed, mainly due to the introduction of alternative methods. We have revisited this technique and evaluated it for the determination of MICs for fastidious organisms. METHODS: The SGE method was first optimized for fastidious organisms using Haemophilus influenzae. Intra-batch and inter-batch reproducibility was determined for H. influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The method was then evaluated by comparison of MICs for clinical isolates of these organisms determined by SGE with those determined with the reference method. RESULTS: Optimization of the technique resulted in a method with excellent reproducibility for all organisms tested [SD 0.10-0.337; coefficient of variation (CV) 8.59%-18.66%]. These SDs/CVs were lower than those of the reference methods (0.27-2.34; 31.0%-63.8%). There was excellent correlation of the MICs with the reference methods (0.908-0.930) and insignificant differences in numbers of strains in each resistance category, with no tendency for SGE to produce higher or lower MICs than the reference method (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SGE was shown to be reproducible and produced results that correlated well with standard techniques for fastidious organisms. The method offers a rapid, flexible, cost-effective alternative for smaller laboratories and for routine use in developing countries.