Hispanic/Latinx and Spanish Language Concordance Among Palliative Care Clinicians and Patients in Hospital Settings in California.

Background: Members of racial or ethnic minority groups utilize palliative care (PC) services less than non-Hispanic White patients and multiple factors contribute to this disparity. The impact of racial, ethnic, and language (REL) concordance between patients and clinicians has been demonstrated in general medical populations, but not in PC populations. We characterized the racial and ethnic composition and languages spoken of California PC clinicians and patients to examine clinical impacts of REL concordance. Methods: Using Palliative Care Quality Network data, 15 inpatient teams were identified in California that had collected data on patient race/ethnicity and language. Patient and clinician data were analyzed using means and medians for continuous variables, and chi-squared tests to explore similarities and differences between clinician and patient data. Results: 51 clinicians from nine teams completed the survey. The largest non-White and non-English speaking groups among patients and clinicians identified as Hispanic/Latinx (31.5% of patients, 16.3% of clinicians) and as Spanish speakers (22.6% of patients, 7.5% of clinicians). There was a significantly higher proportion of Hispanic/Latinx patients compared to clinicians (p-value 0.01), with Southern California demonstrating the largest difference (30.4% of patients vs. 10.7 % of clinicians, p-value 0.01). Similar proportions of patients and clinicians reported Spanish fluency (22.6% vs 27.5%, p-value 0.31). Discussion: We found significant differences in the racial/ethnic distributions of Hispanic/Latinx patients and clinicians in California, prompting consideration of whether a lack of representation of Hispanic/Latinx clinicians relative to the patient population may contribute to lower palliative care utilization among Hispanic/Latinx patients.

A Systematic Approach to Assessing and Addressing Palliative Care Needs in an Outpatient Population.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVES: A critical frontier for palliative medicine is to develop systems to routinely and equitably address the palliative care (PC) needs of seriously ill populations. METHODS: An automated screen identified Medicare primary care patients who had serious illness based on diagnosis codes and utilization patterns. A stepped-wedge design was used to evaluate a six-month intervention through which a healthcare navigator assessed these seriously ill patients and their care partners for PC needs in the domains of 1) physical symptoms, 2) emotional distress, 3) practical concerns, and 4) advance care planning (ACP) via telephone surveys. Identified needs were addressed with tailored PC interventions. RESULTS: A total of 292/2175 (13.4%) patients screened positive for serious illness. A total of 145 completed an intervention phase; 83 completed a control phase. Severe physical symptoms were identified in 27.6%, emotional distress in 57.2%, practical concerns in 37.2%, and ACP needs in 56.6%. Twenty-five intervention patients (17.2%) were referred to specialty PC compared to six control patients (7.2%). Prevalence of ACP notes increased 45.5%-71.7% (p = 0.001) during the intervention and remained stable during the control phase. Quality of life remained stable during the intervention and declined 7.4/10-6.5/10 (P =0.04) during the control phase. CONCLUSION: Through an innovative program, patients with serious illness were identified from a primary care population, assessed for PC needs, and offered specific services to meet those needs. While some patients were appropriate for specialty PC, even more needs were addressed without specialty PC. The program resulted in increased ACP and preserved quality of life.

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in a subpopulation of older European clinical trial participants: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate and compare the prevalence and type of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) among community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) enrolled to a clinical trial in three European countries. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of the Thyroid Hormone Replacement for Subclinical Hypothyroidism Trial dataset. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of 48/80 PIP and 22/34 PPOs indicators from the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) V2 criteria were applied to prescribed medication data for 532/737 trial participants in Ireland, Switzerland and the Netherlands. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of PIP was lower in the Irish participants (8.7%) compared with the Swiss (16.7%) and Dutch (12.5%) participants (P=0.15) and was not statistically significant. The overall prevalence of PPOs was approximately one-quarter in the Swiss (25.3%) and Dutch (24%) participants and lower in the Irish (14%) participants (P=0.04) and the difference was statistically significant. The hypnotic Z-drugs were the most frequent PIP in Irish participants, (3.5%, n=4), while it was non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and oral anticoagulant combination, sulfonylureas with a long duration of action, and benzodiazepines (all 4.3%, n=7) in Swiss, and benzodiazepines (7.1%, n=18) in Dutch participants. The most frequent PPOs in Irish participants were vitamin D and calcium in osteoporosis (3.5%, n=4). In the Swiss and Dutch participants, they were bone antiresorptive/anabolic therapy in osteoporosis (9.9%, n=16, 8.6%, n=22) respectively. The odds of any PIP after adjusting for age, sex, multimorbidity and polypharmacy were (adjusted OR (aOR)) 3.04 (95% CI 1.33 to 6.95, P<0.01) for Swiss participants and aOR 1.74 (95% CI 0.79 to 3.85, P=0.17) for Dutch participants compared with Irish participants. The odds of any PPOs were aOR 2.48 (95% CI 1.27 to 4.85, P<0.01) for Swiss participants and aOR 2.10 (95% CI 1.11 to 3.96, P=0.02) for Dutch participants compared with Irish participants. CONCLUSIONS: This study has estimated and compared the prevalence and type of PIP and PPOs among this cohort of community-dwelling older people. It demonstrated a significant difference in the prevalence of PPOs between the three populations. Further research is urgently needed into the impact of system level factors as this has important implications for patient safety, healthcare provision and economic costs.

Self-Reported California Hospital Palliative Care Program Composition, Certification, and Staffing Level Are Associated with Lower End-of-Life Medicare Utilization.

BACKGROUND: California hospitals report palliative care (PC) program characteristics to the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), but the significance of this information is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether self-reported California hospital PC program characteristics are associated with lower end-of-life (EoL) Medicare utilization. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional study of hospitals submitting 2012 data to OSHPD and included in the 2012 Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare (DAHC) dataset, using statistical hypothesis testing, multivariate regression, and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Our analysis included 203 hospitals primarily providing general medical-surgical (GMS) care. MEASUREMENTS: The following measures were available for each hospital: licensed GMS beds; type of control; presence of an inpatient or outpatient PC program; number of physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains on the PC team; number of PC-certified staff; percentage of Medicare decedents dying as inpatients; and average total hospital days, ICU days, and physician visits per Medicare decedent in the last six months of life. RESULTS: Investor-owned hospitals have fewer PC programs and higher EoL utilization than do nonprofit hospitals. Among nonprofit hospitals, small size (substantially fewer than 150 medical-surgical beds), or large size and having an inpatient PC program with more than three PC staff per 100 GMS beds, or an interdisciplinary PC-certified team, is associated with significantly lower EoL hospital utilization and percentage of deaths occurring in the inpatient setting. DISCUSSION: Improved program performance associated with higher staffing levels may be mediated by increased access to and earlier PC interventions. CONCLUSION: California hospital-reported PC program characteristics are associated with significantly lower inpatient utilization by Medicare decedents.

Improving the appropriateness of prescribing in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacists' interventions in secondary care.

INTRODUCTION: potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older hospitalised patients, and in particular those with dementia, is associated with poorer health outcomes. PIP reduction is therefore essential in this population. METHODS: a comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted using 12 databases from inception up to and including September 2014. Inclusion criteria were controlled trials (randomised or non-randomised) of interventions involving pharmacists conducted in hospitals, with an objective of the study being PIP reduction in patients 65 years or older or patients with dementia of any age, using any validated PIP tool as an outcome measure. Risk of bias assessments were conducted utilising the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. RESULTS: a total of 1,752 records were found after duplicates were removed. Four trials (n = 1,164 patients; two randomised, two non-randomised) from three countries were included in the quantitative analysis. All studies were at moderate risk of bias. No study focused specifically on dementia patients. Three trials reported statistically significant reductions in the Medication Appropriateness Index score in the intervention group (mean difference from admission to discharge = -7.45, 95% CI: -11.14, -3.76) and other PIP tools such as Beers Criteria. One trial reported reduced drug-related readmissions and another reported increased adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION: multi-disciplinary teams involving pharmacists may improve prescribing appropriateness in older inpatients, though the clinical significance of observed reductions is unclear. More research is required into the effectiveness of pharmacists' interventions in reducing PIP in dementia patients. Additionally, easily assessed and clinically relevant measures of PIP need to be developed.

The effect of copayments for prescriptions on adherence to prescription medicines in publicly insured populations; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Copayments are intended to decrease third party expenditure on pharmaceuticals, particularly those regarded as less essential. However, copayments are associated with decreased use of all medicines. Publicly insured populations encompass some vulnerable patient groups such as older individuals and low income groups, who may be especially susceptible to medication non-adherence when required to pay. Non-adherence has potential consequences of increased morbidity and costs elsewhere in the system. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of non-adherence to prescribed medicines in publicly insured populations exposed to copayments. METHODS: The population of interest consisted of cohorts who received public health insurance. The intervention was the introduction of, or an increase, in copayment. The outcome was non-adherence to medications, evaluated using objective measures. Eight electronic databases and the grey literature were systematically searched for relevant articles, along with hand searches of references in review articles and the included studies. Studies were quality appraised using modified EPOC and EHPPH checklists. A random effects model was used to generate the meta-analysis in RevMan v5.1. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) test; p>0.1 indicated a lack of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seven out of 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies contributed more than 1 result to the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 199,996 people overall; 74,236 people in the copayment group and 125,760 people in the non-copayment group. Average age was 71.75 years. In the copayment group, (verses the non-copayment group), the odds ratio for non-adherence was 1.11 (95% CI 1.09-1.14; P = <0.00001). An acceptable level of heterogeneity at I(2) = 7%, (p = 0.37) was observed. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed an 11% increased odds of non-adherence to medicines in publicly insured populations where copayments for medicines are necessary. Policy-makers should be wary of potential negative clinical outcomes resulting from non-adherence, and also possible knock-on economic repercussions.

The assessment of complications after spine surgery: time for a paradigm shift?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Recent years have witnessed a shift in the assessment of spine surgical outcomes with a greater focus on the patient's perspective. However, this approach has not been widely extended to the assessment of complications. PURPOSE: The present study sought to quantify the patient-rated impact/severity of complications of spine surgery and directly compare the incidences of surgeon-rated and patient-reported complications. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study of patients undergoing surgery for painful degenerative lumbar disorders, being operated in the Spine Center of an orthopedic hospital. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 2,303 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 61.9 [15.1] years; 1,136 [49.3%] women and 1,167 [50.7%] men). PATIENTS: Core Outcome Measures Index, self-rated complications, bothersomeness of complications, global treatment outcome, and satisfaction. Surgeons: Spine Tango surgery and follow-up documentation forms registering surgical details and complications. METHODS: PATIENTS completed questionnaires before and 3 months after surgery. Surgeons documented complications before discharge and at the first postoperative follow-up, 6 to 12 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 615 out of 2,303 (27%) patients reported complications, with "bothersomeness" ratings of 1%, not at all; 22%, slightly; 26%, moderately; 34%, very; and 17%, extremely bothersome. PATIENTS most commonly reported sensory disturbances (35% of those reporting a complication) or ongoing/new pain (27%) followed by wound healing problems (11%) and motor disturbances (8%). The surgeons documented complications in 19% of patients. There was a minimal overlap regarding the presence or absence of complications in any given patient. CONCLUSIONS: Most complications reported by the patient are perceived to be at least moderately bothersome and are, hence, not inconsequential. Surgeons reported lower complication rates than the patients did, and there was only moderate agreement between the ratings of the two. As with treatment outcome, complications and their severity should be assessed from both the patient's and the surgeon's perspectives.

An assessment of the screening performance of a single-item measure of depression from the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale among chronically ill hospitalized patients.

CONTEXT: Few studies have examined the validity of using a single item from the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) for screening for depression. OBJECTIVES: To examine the screening performance of the single-item depression question from the ESAS in chronically ill hospitalized patients. METHODS: A total of 162 chronically ill inpatients aged 65 and older completed a survey after admission that included the well-validated, 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) and four single-item screening questions for depression based on the ESAS question, using two different time frames ("now" and "in the past 24 hours") and two response categories (a 0-10 numeric rating scale [NRS] and a categorical scale: none, mild, moderate, and severe). RESULTS: The GDS-15 categorized 20% (n = 33) of participants as possibly being depressed with a score ≥ 6. The NRS for depression "now" achieved the highest level of sensitivity at a cutoff ≥ 1 (68.8%), and an acceptable level of specificity was obtained at a cutoff of ≥ 5 (82.2%). For depression "in the past 24 hours," a cutoff of ≥ 1 achieved a sensitivity of 68.8% and a cutoff of ≥ 7 a specificity of 80.3%. For the categorical scale, a cutoff of "none" provided the best level of sensitivity for depression "now" (65.6%) and "in the past 24 hours" (81.3%), with an acceptable level of specificity being obtained at ≥"mild" (68.8%) and ≥"moderate" (68.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION: These single-item measures were not effective in screening for probable depression in chronically ill patients regardless of the time frame or the response format used, but a cutoff of ≥ 5 or "mild" or greater did achieve sufficient specificity to raise clinical suspicion.

Longitudinal assessment of symptom severity among hospitalized elders diagnosed with cancer, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Pain, dyspnea, and anxiety are common among patients with cancer, heart failure (HF), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet little is known about the severity of symptoms over time. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, severity, burden, and predictors of symptoms during the course of hospitalization and at 2 weeks after discharge. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: A large academic university. PATIENTS: Patients were 65 years or older with a primary diagnosis of cancer, COPD, or HF. MEASUREMENTS: Daily living skills and depression were recorded at enrollment. Symptoms were assessed daily and 2 weeks postdischarge. RESULTS: At baseline, most participants reported moderate/severe pain (54%), dyspnea (53%), and anxiety (62%). Almost two-thirds (64%) had 2 or more symptoms at a moderate/severe level. The prevalence of moderate/severe symptoms decreased at the 24-hour assessment (pain = 42%, dyspnea = 45%, anxiety = 55%, burden = 55%) and again at follow-up (pain = 28%, dyspnea = 27%, anxiety = 25%, burden = 30%). While there was no association between primary diagnosis and symptom severity at baseline or 24-hour assessment, at 2-week follow-up, a higher percentage of patients with COPD had moderate/severe pain (54%, χ(2) = 22.0, P = 0.001), dyspnea (45%, χ(2) = 9.3, P = 0.05), and overall symptom burden (55%, χ(2) = 25.9, P = 0.001) than those with cancer (pain = 22%, dyspnea = 16%, symptom burden = 16%) or HF (pain = 25%, dyspnea = 24%, symptom burden = 28%). Predictors of symptom burden at follow-up were COPD (odds ratio [OR] = 7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.0, 27.7) and probable depression (OR = 6.1; 95% CI = 2.1, 17.8). CONCLUSION: The majority of inpatients with chronic illness reported high severity of symptoms. Symptoms improved over time but many patients, particularly those with COPD, had high symptom severity at follow-up.

Ratings of global outcome at the first post-operative assessment after spinal surgery: how often do the surgeon and patient agree?

Patient-orientated questionnaires are becoming increasingly popular in the assessment of outcome and are considered to provide a less biased assessment of the surgical result than traditional surgeon-based ratings. The present study sought to quantify the level of agreement between patients' and doctors' global outcome ratings after spine surgery. 1,113 German-speaking patients (59.0 +/- 16.6 years; 643 F, 470 M) who had undergone spine surgery rated the global outcome of the operation 3 months later, using a 5-point scale: operation helped a lot, helped, helped only little, didn't help, made things worse. They also rated pain, function, quality-of-life and disability, using the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), and their satisfaction with treatment (5-point scale). The surgeon completed a SSE Spine Tango Follow-up form, blind to the patient's evaluation, rating the outcome with the McNab criteria as excellent, good, fair, and poor. The data were compared, in terms of (1) the correlation between surgeons' and patients' ratings and (2) the proportions of identical ratings, where the doctor's "excellent" was considered equivalent to the patient's "operation helped a lot", "good" to "operation helped", "fair" to "operation helped only little" and "poor" to "operation didn't help/made things worse". There was a significant correlation (Spearman Rho = 0.57, p < 0.0001) between the surgeons' and patients' ratings. Their ratings were identical in 51.2% of the cases; the surgeon gave better ratings than the patient ("overrated") in 25.6% cases and worse ratings ("underrated") in 23.2% cases. There were significant differences between the six surgeons in the degree to which their ratings matched those of the patients, with senior surgeons "overrating" significantly more often than junior surgeons (p < 0.001). "Overrating" was significantly more prevalent for patients with a poor self-rated outcome (measured as global outcome, COMI score, or satisfaction with treatment; each p < 0.001). In a multivariate model controlling for age and gender, "low satisfaction with treatment" and "being a senior surgeon" were the most significant unique predictors of surgeon "overrating" (p < 0.0001; adjusted R (2) = 0.21). Factors with no unique significant influence included comorbidity (ASA score), first time versus repeat surgery, one-level versus multilevel surgery. In conclusion, approximately half of the patient's perceptions of outcome after spine surgery were identical to those of the surgeon. Generally, where discrepancies arose, there was a tendency for the surgeon to be slightly more optimistic than the patient, and more so in relation to patients who themselves declared a poor outcome. This highlights the potential bias in outcome studies that rely solely on surgeon ratings of outcome and indicates the importance of collecting data from both the patient and the surgeon, in order to provide a balanced view of the outcome of spine surgery.

Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain.

Spine stabilization exercises, in which patients are taught to perform isolated contractions of the transverses abdominus (TrA) during "abdominal hollowing", are a popular physiotherapeutic treatment for low back pain (LBP). Successful performance is typically judged by the relative increase in TrA thickness compared with that of the internal (OI) and external (OE) oblique muscles, measured using ultrasound. The day-to-day measurement error (imprecision) associated with these indices of preferential activation has not been assessed but is important to know since it influences the interpretation of changes after treatment. On 2 separate days, 14 controls and 14 patients with chronic LBP (cLBP) performed abdominal hollowing exercises in hook-lying, while M-mode ultrasound images superimposed with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) data were recorded from the abdominal muscles (N = 5 on each side). The fascial lines bordering the TrA, OI and OE were digitized, and muscle thicknesses were calculated. The between-day error (intra-observer) was expressed as the standard error of measurement, SEM; SEM as a percentage of the mean gave the coefficient of variation (CV). There were no significant between-day differences for the mean values of resting or maximal thickness for any muscle, in either group (P > 0.05). The median SEM and CV of all thickness variables was 0.71 mm and 10.9%, respectively for the controls and 0.80 mm or 11.3%, respectively for the cLBP patients. For the contraction ratios (muscle thickness contracted/thickness at rest), the CVs were 3-11% (controls) and 5-12% (patients). The CVs were unacceptably high (30-50%, both groups) for the TrA preferential activation ratio (TrA proportion of the total lateral abdominal muscle thickness when contracted minus at rest). In both the controls and patients, the precision of measurement of absolute muscle thickness and relative change in thickness during abdominal hollowing was acceptable, and commensurate with that typical of biological measurements. The TrA preferential activation ratio is too imprecise to be of clinical use. Knowledge of the SEM for these indices is essential for interpreting the clinical relevance of any changes observed following physiotherapy.

Sun care advertising in popular U.S. magazines.

PURPOSE: We assessed the placement of magazine advertising for sun care products to lay the groundwork for broader promotion to more diverse and high-risk demographic groups. METHODS: We reviewed 579 issues of 24 magazines published between the months of May and September from 1997 to 2002. We conducted a cover-to-cover review of top-selling magazines for men, women, teens, parents, travelers, and outdoor recreation users. We determined if there were any advertisements for the following sun care products: sun tanning lotions containing sun protection factor (SPF), sunless tanners without SPF, sunscreen with SPF, moisturizers with SPF, or cosmetics with SPF (which include sunless tanners containing SPF. RESULTS: Sun care products, including sunscreens, were advertised primarily in women's magazines (77%). Nearly two thirds of all sun care products advertised were either for cosmetics (38%) or moisturizers (26%) containing SPF, followed by ads for sunscreen sold as a stand-alone product (19%). None of the ads contained all of the recommendations for safe use of sunscreen: a minimum SPF of 15, both UVA and UVB protection, reapplication instructions, and an adequate application coverage of 2 milligrams per square centimeter. DISCUSSION: Magazine advertising to men, travelers, outdoor recreation users, and parents/families (totaling a circulation of 41 million readers) during this six-year period were far fewer than those for women, despite high rates of excessive sun exposure in these groups.

Sun protection policies and practices at child care centers in Massachusetts.

We assessed the relationship between sun protection policies and practices at child care centers in Massachusetts. We hypothesized that centers with sun protection policies were more likely to have regular sun protection practices in place compared to centers without these policies. We conducted a telephone survey with directors or assistant directors at 327 child care centers during the summer of 2002. The main outcome measure was sun protection practices, which included time spent outside during mid-day and the use of sunscreen, hats, and protective clothing by the majority of children assessed over the last 5 program days. The 36-item survey also inquired about the center's sun protection policy and included demographic questions. Most centers (73%) reported having a written sun protection policy. Sun protection policies were positively associated with reported sunscreen (chi squared = 14.63, p = 0.0001) and hat use (chi squared = 30.98, p < 0.0001) and inversely associated with time outside (chi squared = 10.76, p = 0.001). Seventy-seven percent of centers followed recommended sunscreen practices. However, centers were far less likely to have recommended hat use (36%) and protective clothing (1.5%) practices. A formal sun protection policy may be an effective way to increase sun protection practices in the child care setting. Further research should assess this relationship in other states. Improving and expanding existing state regulations may be a reasonable strategy to increase sun protection at child care centers.