The economic burden of Ebola virus disease: a review and recommendations for analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ebola virus disease (EVD) continues to be a major public health threat globally, particularly in the low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) of Africa. The social and economic burdens of EVD are substantial and have triggered extensive research into prevention and control. We aim to highlight the impact and economic implications, identify research gaps, and offer recommendations for future economic studies pertaining to EVD. METHOD: We conducted a comprehensive librarian-led search in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, EconLit and Scopus for economic evaluations of EVD. After study selection and data extraction, findings on the impact and economics of EVD were synthesized using a narrative approach, while identifying gaps, and recommending critical areas for future EVD economic studies. RESULTS: The economic evaluations focused on the burden of illness, vaccine cost-effectiveness, willingness-to-pay for a vaccine, EVD funding, and preparedness costs. The estimated economic impact of the 2014 EVD outbreak in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone across studies ranged from $30 billion to $50 billion. Facility construction and modification emerged as significant cost drivers for preparedness. The EVD vaccine demonstrated cost-effectiveness in a dynamic transmission model; resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of about $96 per additional disability adjusted life year averted. Individuals exhibited greater willingness to be vaccinated if it incurred no personal cost, with a minority willing to pay about $1 for the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: The severe impact of EVD puts pressure on governments and the international community for better resource utilization and re-allocation. Several technical and methodological issues related to economic evaluation of EVD remain to be addressed, especially for LMICs. We recommend conducting cost-of-sequelae and cost-of-distribution analyses in addition to adapting existing economic analytical methods to EVD. Characteristics of the affected regions should be considered to provide evidence-based economic plans and economic-evaluation of mitigations that enhance resource allocation for prevention and treatment.

Ebola virus disease (EVD) is a serious health problem, not only in Africa where there have been outbreaks but in other parts of the world as well. In addition to its severe health implications and resultant death, EVD also poses significant impact across several sectors, including food and agriculture, transportation, education, among others, ultimately impacting the economies of affected countries. While some studies have estimated the economic burden of EVD, there remains questions that need addressing. We conducted a review of published studies to estimate what is known about the economic burden of EVD, identified research gaps. Studies looked at how much money EVD costs in terms of prevention and treatment, while others reported on people's willingness to pay for a vaccine. The estimated economic impact of the 2014 EVD outbreak in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone ranged from approximately $30 billion to $50 billion across studies. Healthcare facility construction and modification were significant cost factors for response preparedness for EVD outbreaks. While the EVD vaccine showed cost-effectiveness, surveys of people across various regions revealed that more individuals were willing to get vaccinated if it was free, with a minority willing to pay a median of about $1 for the vaccine. The severe impact of EVD puts pressure on governments and the international community to use resources more efficiently. We recommend conducting analyses on the costs of long-term effects of EVD and costs of vaccine and treatment distribution, as well as adapting existing economic methods to the specific characteristics of affected regions. This would help create evidence-based economic plans and evaluations of strategies to enhance resource allocation for EVD prevention and treatment.

Understanding faculty perceptions and experiences related to climate, diversity, equity, and inclusion at a college of pharmacy: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: A climate survey was piloted to obtain an understanding of the perceptions and personal experiences of faculty for intentional planning of future meaningful, effective, and sustainable diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts at a college of pharmacy. METHODS: A 48-item, four section, online survey was developed and administered to 69 faculty between October and November 2021. Likert-like five-point scales and free-text items were included to determine an overall assessment of climate, as well as perceptions and/or personal experiences for each domain of DEI, and demographics. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (57%) faculty completed the survey. For climate, every attribute had at least one respondent that observed someone make an insensitive or disparaging remark "rarely," "occasionally," and "frequently." The response pattern was similar for personal experience with insensitive remarks. For participation in diversity activities, "awareness without participation" was selected by 56% of respondents. For perceptions of diversity, "fairly" or "very" was selected by 38% to 54% of respondents. For equity, "attainable for some" to "not attainable" was identified for 15% to 26% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot climate survey results inform climate improvement as it relates to DEI and informs survey instrument refinement.

Economic Evaluation of Three BRAF + MEK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced Unresectable Melanoma With BRAF Mutation From a US Payer Perspective.

BACKGROUND: The combinations of BRAF + MEK inhibitors-encorafenib (ENC) + binimetinib (BIN), cobimetinib (COB) + vemurafenib (VEM), and dabrafenib (DAB) + trametinib (TRA)-are recommended for the treatment of BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ENC + BIN versus COB + VEM versus DAB + TRA from a US payer perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to simulate a hypothetical cohort over a time horizon of 10 years. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were independently digitized from a randomized controlled trial for ENC + BIN and fitted using R software. Published and indirectly estimated hazard ratios were used to fit OS and PFS curves for COB + VEM and DAB + TRA. Costs, life-year gains, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with the 3 treatment combinations were estimated. A base case analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). A discount rate of 3.5% was applied on cost and outcomes. RESULTS: The ENC + BIN versus COB + VEM comparison was associated with an ICUR of $656 233 per QALY gained. The ENC + BIN versus DAB + TRA comparison was associated with an ICUR of $3 135 269 per QALY gained. The DAB + TRA combination dominated COB + VEM. The base case analysis estimates were confirmed by the PSA estimates. ENC + BIN was the most cost-effective combination at a high willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $573 000 per QALY and $1.5 million/QALY when compared to COB + VEM and DAB + TRA, respectively. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Given current prices and acceptable WTP thresholds, our study suggests that DAB + TRA is the optimum treatment. In this study, ENC + BIN was cost-effective only at a very high WTP per QALY threshold.

Association between Patient-Provider Communication and Self-Perceived Mental Health in US Adults with Cancer: Real-World Evidence through Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Using real-world data, this retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to analyze the association between patient-physician communication and self-reported mental health from cancer patients using publicly available 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) household component data. Four adjusted logistic regression models were conducted to analyze the association between patient-physician communication and self-perceived mental health among United States adult cancer patients, with each model assessing different aspects of patient-physician communication: being respected (respect), being listened to (listen), spending enough time (time), and being explained (explain). The main finding from this study was that only the time model showed a statistical significance, where patients who reported that their physician always spent enough time perceived their mental health as good. Other covariates that showed statistical significance with self-perceived mental health in cancer patients included age, income level, physical limitation, and limitation from pain. In conclusion, there were generally no statistically significant associations between patient-physician communication and mental health among cancer patients.

Comparing jurisdiction-specific pharmaco-economic evaluations using medical purchasing power parities.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate how medical purchasing power parities (mPPP) may harmonize economic evaluations from different jurisdictions and enable comparisons across jurisdictions. METHODS: We describe the use of mPPPs and illustrate this with an example of economic evaluations of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine (Nab-P + Gem) versus gemcitabine monotherapy in the setting of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Following a literature search, we extracted data from cost-effectiveness studies on these treatments performed in various countries. mPPPs from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development were used to convert reported costs in the jurisdiction of origins to US dollars for the most current year using two possible pathways: (1) reported costs first adjusted by mPPP then adjusted by exchange index; and (2) reported costs first adjusted by exchange index then adjusted by mPPP. RESULTS: Despite many of the pharmaco-economic evaluations sharing similar assumptions and inputs, even after mPPP conversion, residual heterogeneity was attributable to perspectives, discount rate, outcomes, and costs, among others; including in studies conducted in the same jurisdiction. CONCLUSION: Despite the methodological challenges and heterogeneity within and across jurisdictions, we demonstrated that mPPP offers a way to compare economic evaluations across jurisdictions.

Economic evaluation using dynamic transition modeling of ebola virus vaccination in lower-and-middle-income countries.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing occurrence of infectious diseases in lower-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), emergency preparedness is essential for rapid response and mitigation. Economic evaluations of mitigation technologies and strategies have been recommended for inclusion in emergency preparedness plans. We aimed to perform an economic evaluation using dynamic transition modeling of ebola virus disease (EVD) vaccination in a hypothetical community of 1,000 persons in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). METHOD: Using a modified SEIR (Susceptible, Exposed, Infectious, Recovered, with Death added [SEIR-D]) model that accounted for death and epidemiological data from an EVD outbreak in the DRC, we modeled the transmission of EVD in a hypothetical population of 1,000. With our model, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of an EVD vaccine and an EVD vaccination intervention. RESULTS: The results showed vaccinating 50% of the population at risk prevented 670 cases, 538 deaths, and 22,022 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The vaccine was found to be cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $95.63 per DALY averted. We also determined the minimum required vaccination coverage for cost-effectiveness to be 40%. Sensitivity analysis showed our model to be fairly robust, assuring relatively consistent results even with variations in such input parameters as cost of screening, as well as transmission, infection, incubation, and case fatality rates. CONCLUSION: EVD vaccination in our hypothetical population was found to be cost-effective from the payer perspective. Our model presents an efficient and reliable approach for conducting economic evaluations of infectious disease interventions as part of an emergency preparedness plan.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYInfectious diseases affect lower-and-middle-income (LMIC) countries, with their limited resources, disproportionately more. This is certainly the case for ebola virus disease (EVD), a rare, severe, and mostly fatal disease. Vaccination is now available, but whether it is cost-effective remains an open question. We evaluated its cost-effectiveness by modeling the spread of EVD in a hypothetical population of 1000 persons. Using data from an EVD outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), we estimated how many of persons susceptible to infection were exposed to the virus, became infected, recovered, or died. We did so for two scenarios: vaccinating versus not vaccinating enough people to achieve herd immunity. We assumed vaccinating 50% of the people and estimated how many infections, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALY; the loss of the equivalent of a year of full health) would be prevented by vaccination. Our cost-effectiveness metric was the incremental cost of preventing one DALY.The outcomes of vaccination offset the additional costs. Vaccinating 50% of the population of 1000 cost an additional $2,081,358 but prevented 670 infections, 538 deaths, and 22022 DALYs. Preventing one DALY cost $95.63. This is very cost-effective as it is less than the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita for the DRC of $556.81. Vaccination below 40% of the population was less cost-effective, was most cost-effective at the herd immunity threshold of 45.3%, beyond which there were diminishing returns. Summarized, vaccination against EVD is clinically very effective and certainly worth the additional cost.