Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease caused by Mycobacterium avium complex - disease burden, unmet needs, and advances in treatment developments.

INTRODUCTION: Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) lung disease (LD) is the most common clinical manifestation of NTM infection and is a growing health concern. Up to 85% of NTM-LD cases are caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Increased awareness of NTM-LD caused by MAC is needed as patients with this disease experience substantial burden and unmet treatment needs. AREAS COVERED: This review provides clinicians and regulatory and healthcare decision makers an overview of the clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of NTM-LD and the unmet treatment needs faced by patients and clinicians. The review focuses on NTM-LD caused by MAC. A summary of the 2020 NTM guidelines specifically for MAC-LD and an overview of novel treatment options, including amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) as the first approved therapy for refractory MAC-LD, and investigational drugs in testing phase are provided. EXPERT OPINION: Key advancements in NTM-LD management include recent updates to clinical practice guidelines, approval of ALIS for the treatment of refractory MAC-LD, and ongoing clinical trials of investigational treatments. Yet opportunities still exist to improve patient outcomes, including development of better screening tools, such as reliable and responsive biomarkers to help identify high-risk patients, and addressing unmet treatment needs.

Predictive modeling of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease epidemiology using German health claims data.

OBJECTIVES: Administrative claims data are prone to underestimate the burden of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). METHODS: We developed machine learning-based algorithms using historical claims data from cases with NTM-PD to predict patients with a high probability of having previously undiagnosed NTM-PD and to assess actual prevalence and incidence. Adults with incident NTM-PD were classified from a representative 5% sample of the German population covered by statutory health insurance during 2011-2016 by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision code A31.0. Pre-diagnosis characteristics (patient demographics, comorbidities, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and medications) were extracted and compared to that of a control group without NTM-PD to identify risk factors. RESULTS: Applying a random forest model (area under the curve 0.847; total error 19.4%) and a risk threshold of >99%, prevalence and incidence rates in 2016 increased 5-fold and 9-fold to 19 and 15 cases/100,000 population, respectively, for both coded and non-coded vs. coded cases alone. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a machine learning-based algorithm applied to German statutory health insurance claims data predicted a considerable number of previously unreported NTM-PD cases with high probabilty.

Health economic evidence of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in post-herpetic neuralgia.

BACKGROUND: Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common and most debilitating complication of herpes zoster, and involves considerable associated costs. OBJECTIVE: This paper presents results from nine health economic studies undertaken in eight European countries that compared lidocaine medicated plaster with gabapentin and/or pregabalin in PHN. It aims to support the increasing need for published cost-effectiveness data for health care decision-making processes in Europe. METHODS: All studies were based on a similar core Markov model with data derived from clinical trials, local Delphi panels, and official national price and tariff lists. The main outcome measure was cost per quality-adjusted life year gained; time without pain or intolerable adverse events was also included as a secondary outcome measure. All studies focused on an elderly population of patients with PHN who had insufficient pain relief with standard analgesics and could not tolerate or had contraindications to tricyclic antidepressants. RESULTS: Despite considerable differences in many of the variables used, the results showed remarkable similarity and suggested that use of lidocaine medicated plaster offered cost-savings in many of the countries studied, where it proved a highly cost-effective alternative to both gabapentin and pregabalin. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine medicated plaster is a cost-effective alternative to gabapentin and pregabalin in the treatment of PHN. These savings are largely the result of the superior safety profile of the lidocaine medicated plaster.

Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain.

BACKGROUND: Assessments of health-related quality of life and particularly utility values are important components of health economic analyses. Several instruments have been developed to measure utilities. However no consensus has emerged regarding the most appropriate instrument within a therapeutic area such as chronic pain. The study compared two instruments - EQ-5D and SF-6D - for their performance and validity in patients with chronic pain. METHODS: Pooled data from three randomised, controlled clinical trials with two active treatment groups were used. The included patients suffered from osteoarthritis knee pain or low back pain. Differences between the utility measures were compared in terms of mean values at baseline and endpoint, Bland-Altman analysis, correlation between the dimensions, construct validity, and responsiveness. RESULTS: The analysis included 1977 patients, most with severe pain on the Numeric Rating Scale. The EQ-5D showed a greater mean change from baseline to endpoint compared with the SF-6D (0.43 to 0.58 versus 0.59 to 0.64). Bland-Altman analysis suggested the difference between two measures depended on the health status of a patient. Spearmans rank correlation showed moderate correlation between EQ-5D and SF-6D dimensions. Construct validity showed both instruments could differentiate between patient subgroups with different severities of adverse events and analgesic efficacies but larger differences were detected with the EQ-5D. Similarly, when anchoring the measures to a disease-specific questionnaire - Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - both questionnaires could differentiate between WOMAC severity levels but the EQ-5D showed greater differences. Responsiveness was also higher with the EQ-5D and for the subgroups in which improvements in health status were expected or when WOMAC severity level was reduced the improvements with EQ-5D were higher than with SF-6D. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed that the mean EQ-5D scores were lower than mean SF-6D scores in patients with chronic pain. EQ-5D seemed to have higher construct validity and responsiveness in these patients.

Cost-effectiveness of tapentadol in severe chronic pain in Spain: a cost analysis of data from RCTs.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is known to be a significant and common health problem. Tapentadol, a recently developed centrally active, oral analgesic agent is used to treat adults with severe chronic pain that can be adequately managed only with opioid analgesics. Tapentadol has been reported to provide an improved adverse-events (AE) profile compared with other potent opioid analgesics at similar levels of analgesia. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of tapentadol to that of opioids commonly used as first-line treatment of severe, chronic, nonmalignant pain from the perspective of the health care payer in Spain. METHODS: A Markov state-transition model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of first-line treatment with tapentadol to that of oxycodone, morphine, and transdermal fentanyl (TDF) over a 1-year time horizon. Four health states were defined: (1) treatment discontinuation due to a severe AE; (2) treatment discontinuation due to a lack of efficacy; (3) occurrence of an AE that required medical treatment; and (4) no discontinuation and no AE. If a patient discontinued a treatment, he or she was switched to an alternative, second-line opioid. Data regarding efficacy, tolerability, and utility values (EQ-5D) were derived from randomized clinical trials. Clinical experts estimated the rates of switching to other opioids and the health care resource utilization associated with the treatment of severe chronic pain. Unit costs were derived from public price lists/tariff works and were calculated from the perspective of the National Spanish Health System. The robustness of the model results was tested in extensive sensitivity analyses in which event probabilities, costs, utilities, and treatment-switching rates were altered. RESULTS: Data from 3 studies (1981 patients) were included in the model. Overall, the model predicted that initiating first-line treatment with tapentadol in patients with severe, chronic, nonmalignant pain was associated with lower costs and greater efficacy versus first-line treatment with oxycodone. Compared with morphine and TDF, tapentadol yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of €2656 and €2069 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. On extensive 1-way and scenario analyses, findings on the cost-effectiveness of tapentadol were consistent. The probability that tapentadol would be cost-effective compared with each comparator at the willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 to €30,000/QALY gained exceeded 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings from the present model, tapentadol is likely to be a cost-effective first-line treatment in patients with severe, chronic, nonmalignant pain in Spain according to the commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. Compared with morphine and TDF, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were low; compared with oxycodone, tapentadol dominated, showing better quality-of-life outcomes at lower costs.

Cost-effectiveness of tapentadol prolonged release compared with oxycodone controlled release in the UK in patients with severe non-malignant chronic pain who failed 1st line treatment with morphine.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of tapentadol PR (prolonged release) compared with oxycodone CR (controlled release) in severe non-malignant chronic pain patients in whom controlled release morphine was ineffective or not tolerated. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to assess costs and benefits over a 1-year time horizon from the National Health Service perspective in the UK. Patients could either continue on 2nd line therapy or switch to 3rd line opioid due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. Patients failing also 3rd line therapy entered the final absorbing health state (4th line). Data on tolerability, efficacy, and utilities for tapentadol and oxycodone were obtained from the three comparative phase III clinical trials. Costs of resource consumption associated with opioid treatment were derived from a retrospective database analysis of anonymized patient records. RESULTS: The model results predicted that initiating 2nd line therapy with tapentadol leads to higher effectiveness and lower costs vs oxycodone. For the overall population included in the clinical trials, mean annual costs per patient when treated with tapentadol and oxycodone were £3543 and £3656, respectively. Treatment with tapentadol, while cheaper than oxycodone, was more effective (0.6371 vs 0.6237 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for tapentadol and oxycodone, respectively), meaning that tapentadol dominated oxycodone. For the sub-group of opioid-experienced patients with severe pain at baseline the ranking in terms of costs and QALYs remained unchanged. Extensive sensitivity analyses showed that conclusions about the cost-effectiveness are consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness study suggested that initiating 2nd line treatment in patients with severe non-malignant chronic pain in the UK with tapentadol instead of oxycodone improves patients' quality-of-life and is less costly. Key limitations when interpreting the results are the use of different sources to populate the model and restricted generalizability due to data extrapolation.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of HPV vaccination alongside cervical cancer screening programme in Slovenia.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination alongside cervical cancer screening programme in Slovenia. METHODS: A previously published Markov model representing natural history of HPV infection was adapted to Slovenian context. The model followed a cohort of 12-year-old girls to 85-year-old women. Two strategies were compared: HPV vaccination alongside conventional cytological screening versus screening alone. Analysis was performed from the health care payer perspective. RESULTS: Vaccination with screening compared with screening alone was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 23,178 EUR per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and 54,536 EUR per life-year gained (LYG) at the discounting rate of 5%. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICER was most sensitive to the need for booster dose and to different values of discount rates. In case the booster dose was assumed 10 years after initial vaccination, the ICER value was increased to 58,690 EUR per QALY. On the other hand, using lower values of discount rates than the base case 5% significantly reduced the ICER value. CONCLUSION: According to the cost-effectiveness thresholds of 30,000 EUR per QALY which was adopted by the Health Council in Slovenia, HPV vaccination alongside screening programme can be regarded as cost-effective. However, cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination would become questionable in case a booster dose was needed to provide lifetime protection.

Market uptake of biologic and small-molecule--targeted oncology drugs in Europe.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the market uptake of biologic and small-molecule-targeted oncology drugs in Europe. METHODS: Targeted oncology drugs that were used in one of the selected European countries before the end of 2007 were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The following European countries were included: Austria, Croatia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom. Monetary market uptake of targeted oncology drugs was assessed by using sales data (in euros) obtained from 2 large data- bases for the period 1997-2007. Market uptake was assessed in terms of expenditures for specific drugs in euros per capita and in market shares. RESULTS: The monetary market uptake of targeted oncology drugs had an exponential growth from 1997 to 2007 in all comparison countries and reached 40% of the total oncology drug market in 2007. Although the various European countries allocate substantially different amounts of resources per capita for oncology drugs, the share of expenditures attributed to targeted oncology drugs did not differ substantially among the countries. Biologic molecules were used in clinical practice before the small-molecule-targeted oncology drugs. Targeted oncology drugs that were introduced first to clinical practice in most of the comparison countries (ie, rituximab, trastuzumab, imatinib mesylate) maintained the leading positions on the market throughout the period of the analysis. In 2007, approximately 25% of all expenditures for oncology drugs were attributed to biologic oncology drugs, and approximately 15% were spent on small-molecule-targeted oncology drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Expenditures on targeted oncology drugs have been increasing exponentially in Europe throughout the past decade and have reached a 40% share of the oncology drug market. As of 2007, the market share of biologic oncology drugs was higher than the market share of small-molecule-targeted oncology drugs.

Cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1 genotyping in second-line, high-dose, once every 3 weeks irinotecan monotherapy treatment of colorectal cancer.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1 genotyping in second-line, high-dose, once every 3 weeks irinotecan monotherapy treatment of colorectal cancer. METHODS: Standard therapy was compared with alternative strategies based on UGT1A1 genotyping from the US healthcare payer perspective. Two alternative strategies (dose reduction and prophylactic use of G-CSF with prior genotyping) and standard therapy were evaluated in a decision analysis, whereas alternative regimens were considered in discussion. The effectiveness outcome was severe neutropenia occurrence and number of life-years gained. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Genotyping in combination with a subsequent reduction of initial irinotecan dose for UGT1A1 7/7 genotype patients was cost-saving for the population of African and Caucasian origin. By contrast, UGT1A1 genotyping was not cost effective for the population of Asian ancestry. Furthermore, the prophylactic use of G-CSFs in UGT1A1 7/7 genotype patients was not cost effective in any population group. Finally, the application of a 3-weekly high-dose treatment regimen with a 20% reduced dosage compared with the low-dose weekly irinotecan regimen in patients with UGT1A1 7/7 genotype was less expensive and is more convenient for the patient.

Accessibility to targeted oncology drugs in Slovenia and selected European countries.

AIM: The aim of the study is to compare the accessibility to targeted oncology drugs in Slovenia and selected European countries. METHODS: Accessibility of targeted oncology drugs was assessed by using their sales data, expressed in mg per individual dying of the cancer for which the drug was indicated. RESULTS: The time of introduction of targeted oncology drugs in Slovenia was in most cases similar to the comparison countries, except for alemtuzumab and rituximab. The utilisation of targeted oncology drugs in Slovenia was in most cases lower than in other comparison countries. Ibritumomab had not been used in Slovenia until 2005, similar to France, Switzerland and UK. After 2003 the utilisation of trastuzumab in Slovenia started to rise substantially, approaching the average uptake in comparison countries. CONCLUSION: The utilisation of targeted oncology drugs in Slovenia was in most cases lower than in comparison countries.