Effects of adding statins before surgery on mortality and major morbidity: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To re-evaluate the effects of adding a statin before surgery on mortality at 30 days and at 1 year and on major morbidity at 0-30 days. DESIGN: A meta-analysis of parallel, randomized, controlled trials published in English. SETTING: A university-based electronic search. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing any type of procedure. INTERVENTION: Adding a statin before a procedure compared to a placebo or no intervention. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A search for all randomized controlled trials (RCT) was done in PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in November 2012. The quality of each study was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration Tools. An I-square ≥ 25% was chosen as the cut-off point for heterogeneity exploration. The search produced 29 trials. Statins reduced the 0-30 days' risk of myocardial infarction: risk ratio (RR) 0.48 (95%CI 0.38, 0.61); I-square 13.2%; p<0.001; number needed-to-treat 17 (14, 24). There were no statistical differences at 0-30 days for stroke RR 0.70 (0.25, 1.95), acute renal insufficiency RR 0.54 (0.26, 1.12) or reoperation RR 1.10 (0.51, 2.38). There was a trend for a reduced mortality at 1 year RR 0.26 (0.06, 1.02); I-square 0%; p = 0.053. The hospital length of stay was slightly decreased with atorvastatin: standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.27 (-0.39, -0.14), p<0.001; fluvastatin SMD -0.95 (-1.56, -0.34), p = 0.002; and rosuvastatin SMD -0.69 (-0.98, -0.40), p<0.001 but not with simvastatin SMD -0.04 (-0.41, 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Adding a statin before a high risk cardiac procedure reduces the 0-30 days' risk of myocardial infarction.

Cardiac arrest associated with reperfusion of the liver during transplantation: incidence and proposal for a management algorithm.

Cardiac arrest associated with reperfusion of the liver allograft in a euvolemic patient is a rare but potentially devastating event. There are few case series describing experience with this complication and no published management protocols guiding treatment. This article is a retrospective case series of patients experiencing post-reperfusion intraoperative cardiac arrest between 1997 and 2011. Among 1581 liver transplants, 16 (1%) patients experienced post-reperfusion cardiac arrest. Among patients with intraoperative arrests, 14 (88%) patients required open cardiac massage. Seven (44%) were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) when cardiac activity failed to adequately recover. Placement on CPB reversed cardiac pump failure and established a perfusing rhythm in six of seven (86%) recipients, leading to one of seven (14%) intraoperative mortality. Recovery of myocardial function was associated with low early survival with only 3/7 (43%) patients who underwent CPB surviving until discharge. Among all patients who survived the perioperative period, one-yr survival was 70% (N = 7), and five-yr survival was 50% (N = 5). Cardiac arrest during liver transplantation is associated with a poor prognosis during the perioperative period. In patients who do not recover cardiac activity after standard resuscitative measures, progression to physiologic support with systemic anticoagulation and CPB may allow correction of electrolyte derangements, maintenance of cerebral perfusion, and myocardial recovery.

The impact of continuous pulse oximetry monitoring on intensive care unit admissions from a postsurgical care floor.

Continuous pulse oximetry (CPOX) has the potential to increase vigilance and decrease pulmonary complications and thus decrease intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. In a randomized nonblinded study of 1219 subjects we compared the effects of CPOX and standard monitoring on the rate of transfer to an ICU from a 33-bed postcardiothoracic surgery care floor. There was no difference in the rate of ICU readmission between the CPOX and standard monitor groups. Despite older age and comorbidity, estimated cost to time of censoring (enrollment to completion of the study) was less in the monitored patients who required ICU transfer than in the unmonitored patients who required ICU transfer (mean estimated cost difference of 28,195 dollars; P = 0.04). Use of CPOX altered the reasons that patients were transferred to an ICU but did not affect the rate of transfer. The duration, and thus estimated cost, of ICU stay was significantly less in the CPOX-monitored group. The potential for CPOX to allow for early intervention, or perhaps prevention of pulmonary complications, needs to be explored. Routine CPOX monitoring did not reduce transfer to ICU, mortality, or overall estimated cost of hospitalization, and it is unclear if there is any real benefit from the application of this technology in patients on a general care floor who are recovering from cardiothoracic surgery.