Tools for Responding to Patient-Initiated Verbal Sexual Harassment: A Workshop for Trainees and Faculty.

Introduction: Patients are the most common source of gender-based harassment of resident physicians, yet residents receive little training on how to handle it. Few resources exist for residents wishing to address patient-initiated verbal sexual harassment themselves. Methods: We developed, taught, and evaluated a 50-minute workshop to prepare residents and faculty to respond to patient-initiated verbal sexual harassment toward themselves and others. The workshop used an interactive lecture and role-play scenarios to teach a tool kit of communication strategies for responding to harassment. Participants completed retrospective pre-post surveys on their ability to meet the learning objectives and their preparedness to respond. Results: Ninety-one participants (57 trainees, 34 faculty) completed surveys at one of five workshop sessions across multiple departments. Before the workshop, two-thirds (67%) had experienced patient-initiated sexual harassment, and only 28 out of 59 (48%) had ever addressed it. Seventy-five percent of participants had never received training on responding to patient-initiated sexual harassment. After the workshop, participants reported significant improvement in their preparedness to recognize and respond to all forms of patient-initiated verbal sexual harassment (p < .01), with the greatest improvements noted in responding to mild forms of verbal sexual harassment, such as comments on appearance or attractiveness or inappropriate jokes (p < .01). Discussion: This workshop fills a void by preparing residents and faculty to respond to verbal sexual harassment from patients that is not directly observed. Role-play and rehearsal of an individualized response script significantly improved participants' preparedness to respond to harassment toward themselves and others.

Pupil expansion device use and operative outcomes with topical dilation vs intracameral epinephrine in resident-performed cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the use of topical dilation drops vs topical drops with the addition of intracameral epinephrine in resident-performed cataract surgery and the effects on pupil expansion device (PED) use, surgical costs, and surgical times. SETTING: Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Resident-performed primary cataract surgical cases using topical dilation drops only or drops with the addition of intracameral epinephrine were analyzed for PED use, surgical time, and costs in all patients and in patients with a history of tamsulosin use. RESULTS: In the topical group, PEDs were used in 31.1% of cases compared with 13.5% of cases in the intracameral group (P < .0001). History of tamsulosin use was noted in about one third of cases in both groups. For patients with a history of tamsulosin use, PED use decreased from 52.7% in the topical cases to 17.9% in the intracameral group (P < .0001). Surgical times were on average 7.1 minutes slower with PED use than without PED use. There was a medication savings of $50.44 USD per case in the intracameral group compared with the topical group. Factoring in the $100 to $130 USD per PED used, total surgical costs were $19 267 USD less in the intracameral group over 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Intracameral epinephrine with lidocaine decreases the need for PED use during cataract surgery, lowers intraoperative costs, and improves efficiency compared with topical dilation drops alone.

Resident and fellow participation in strabismus surgery: effect of level of training and number of assistants on operative time and cost.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the level of training and number of assistants on operative time for uncomplicated, 2-muscle, horizontal strabismus surgery at an academic institution. DESIGN: Comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 993 children and adults between the ages of 6 months and 75 years. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of strabismus surgeries performed between July 1, 2008, and December 31, 2012, by any of 3 attending surgeons assisted by a resident in the postgraduate year 3 (PGY3), fellow in the postgraduate year 5 (PGY5), or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time (minutes) and associated operative cost (dollars). RESULTS: There were 373 cases with 1 assistant and 44 cases with 2 assistants. Of all cases with 1 assistant, there were 200 cases with a PGY3 assistant an average operative time of 62.5 minutes (standard deviation [SD], 15.1) and 173 cases with a PGY5 assistant an average operative time of 59.0 minutes (SD, 14.7); the difference of 3.5 minutes was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The average operative time for all cases with 2 assistants (both PGY3 and PGY5) was 10.6 minutes longer than all cases with 1 assistant (P = 0.0002). No statistically significant variation in operative times was demonstrated when comparing cases with a PGY3 (P = 0.29) and PGY5 (P = 0.44) assistant in their respective first and last halves of the academic year, but operative times within individual quarters of the academic year were significant for PGY3 (P = 0.03) but not for PGY5 (P = 0.24) assistant cases. Operative times were significantly different for individual PGY3 (P = 0.03) but not PGY5 (P = 0.22) assistant cases. Cost per PGY3 assistant per year for additional operative time is $3141.95. CONCLUSIONS: Operative time in strabismus surgery increased with PGY3 participation and further increased with both assistants over either assistant alone. Operative times earlier in the year did not vary from those later in the year for PGY3 or PGY5 assistants. The difference in quarterly and individual PGY3 but not PGY5 assistant operative times suggests that efficiency in strabismus surgery varies by assistants with less experience or interest.

A multicenter analysis of the ophthalmic knowledge assessment program and American Board of Ophthalmology written qualifying examination performance.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance on the American Board of Ophthalmology Written Qualifying Examination (WQE) with the performance on step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and the Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) examination for residents in multiple residency programs. DESIGN: Comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen residency programs with 339 total residents participated in this study. The data were extracted from the 5-year American Board of Ophthalmology report to each participating program in 2009 and included residency graduating classes from 2003 through 2007. Residents were included if data were available for the USMLE, OKAP examination in ophthalmology years 1 through 3, and the WQE score. Residents were excluded if one or more of the test scores were not available. METHODS: Two-sample t tests, logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the association of the various tests (USMLE, OKAP examination year 1, OKAP examination year 2, OKAP examination year 3, and maximum OKAP examination score) as a predictor for a passing or failing grade on the WQE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure of this study was first time pass rate for the WQE. RESULTS: Using ROC analysis, the OKAP examination taken at the third year of ophthalmology residency best predicted performance on the WQE. For the OKAP examination taken during the third year of residency, the probability of passing the WQE was at least 80% for a score of 35 or higher and at least 95% for a score of 72 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The OKAP examination, especially in the third year of residency, can be useful to residents to predict the likelihood of success on the high-stakes WQE examination.

Anesthesia monitoring by registered nurses during cataract surgery: assessment of need for intraoperative anesthesia consultation.

PURPOSE: To assess the frequency and risk factors for intraoperative anesthesia consultation when performing cataract surgery monitored by registered nurses. SETTING: Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. METHODS: This retrospective review was of 270 cataract surgeries performed under local anesthesia from April 1, 2002, to April 1, 2003. RESULTS: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of each patient was determined: 1 patient was classified as ASA 1. One hundred fifty patients were classified as ASA 2. One hundred nineteen patients were classified as ASA 3. The anesthesiology department was consulted 24 times. Nineteen consultations involved patients who were ASA 3, and 5 consultations involved patients who were ASA 2 (P<.001). In most cases (23 of 24), the anesthesia service provided a consultation (eg, increase oxygen flow rate, clarification of electrocardiogram, start intravenous line, equipment repair) and left the nurses to continue to monitor the patient. In only 1 case (ASA 3), the anesthesia service converted the case to monitored anesthesia care and relieved the nurse to monitor the patient. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, monitoring of routine cataract surgery by registered nurses was associated with a low rate of intraoperative anesthesia consultation. Most consultations resulted in little intervention. The ASA classification appears predictive of the need for intraoperative anesthesia consultation.