Prevalence of high screen time in English youth: association with deprivation and physical activity.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) and deprivation are major determinants of health. We estimated the prevalence of high screen time (ST) among English youth and examined whether deprivation mediated the relationship between ST and PA. METHODS: It is a cross-sectional study of 6240 participants (53% boys, aged 10-15 years) enrolled in the East of England Healthy Hearts study. The participants were categorized into three groups based on daily ST: <2, 2-4 or >4 h. Participants were classified as 'active' or 'inactive' based on PA z-scores. RESULTS: Prevalence of >2 h ST was 36%. Participants reporting <2 h daily ST were more likely to be active than those reporting 2-4 h (adjusted OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.26-1.82, P< 0.001) or >4 h (adjusted OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.91-2.67, P< 0.001). Analysis of covariance demonstrated a significant main effect for ST on PA (F = 85.7, P< 0.001) with lower PA in each ascending ST group (P< 0.001). Deprivation was not significantly associated with PA and did not mediate the relationship between ST and PA. CONCLUSIONS: There is high prevalence of >2 h ST in English schoolchildren. PA is lower in children reporting 2-4 versus <2 h daily ST and lower still in those classified as heavy users (>4 h) independent of deprivation.

Contrasting physical activity patterns in children and adolescents living in differing environments in the U.K.

AIMS: There is evidence for lower physical activity (PA) in rural adults; it is important to evaluate how the environment influences the PA of children and adolescents. METHODS: We compared the PA of 6485 English 10-15.9 year olds according to two systems for classifying the immediate environment. System one compared urban and rural areas. System two compared urban, town and fringe, and rural areas. Analyses were carried out separately for children (<13 years) and adolescents (>13 years). RESULTS: Rural children were more active than those from urban areas (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.66) as were adolescents (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11-1.51). Using trilateral division, children were more active if they lived in town and fringe (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.03-1.67) or rural (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.14-1.84) areas compared with urban areas. Adolescents from town and fringe areas were more active than urban dwellers (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.24-1.81). Rural adolescents' PA did not differ from urban dwellers'. CONCLUSIONS: Rural environments support PA in children but not that of adolescents. Town and fringe areas with mixed elements of rural and urban land use appear to facilitate and sustain PA in both children and adolescents.