Comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty performed by a single experienced surgeon.

PURPOSE: The use of endoscopes in otologic procedures has been increasing worldwide. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of microscopic tympanoplasty (MT) and endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) for tympanic membrane and middle ear surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 81 patients who underwent MT (n = 44) and ET (n = 37) for chronic otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation performed by a single surgeon between January 2013 and September 2019. The hearing outcomes, graft success rate, complications, operation time and hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness were recorded and compared between groups. Hearing outcomes were determined by pure tone audiometry. Cost-effectiveness was determined by the operation cost and total cost. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the MT and ET groups regarding demographic characteristics, with the exception of the male:female ratio. There was no significant difference in the pre- and postoperative air conduction, bone conduction thresholds, and air-bone gap values between the two groups, but a significant audiologic improvement was observed in both groups (p < 0.05). In terms of recurrence of tympanic membrane perforation, postoperative otorrhea, and discomfort symptoms, there was no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). The operation time and hospital stay were shorter in the ET group than in the MT group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in operation cost between the two groups (p > 0.05), but the total cost was significantly lower in the ET group than the MT group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ET is as safe and medically efficacious as conventional MT, shortens the operation time and hospital stay, and is cost-effective.

The usefulness of Valsalva computed tomography as an assessment tool for the Eustachian tube.

PURPOSE: To determine the usefulness of 'computed tomography (CT) with Valsalva maneuver (VM)' (Valsalva CT) for localizing lesions of the eustachian tube (ET) and identifying characteristics of ET dysfunction (ETD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case-control study, 12, 17, and 25 patients with obstructive ETD (OETD), patulous eustachian tube (PET), and conductive hearing loss (control), respectively, underwent Valsalva CT in the supine position. The visualized length to total length ratio of the cartilaginous ET (VTRET) with and without VM were compared in the three groups. In the OETD group, obstructed areas of the ET were identified on multiplanar reconstructed images. RESULTS: VTRET without VM in the PET group was significantly higher than that in the control and OETD groups (p-values, 0.003 and 0.007, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the control and OETD groups (p = 0.053). VTRET with VM in the PET group was significantly higher than that in the other two groups (p < 0.001), whereas that in the control group was significantly higher than that in the OETD group (p < 0.001). In the OETD group, the obstructed area was clearly identified, and there were one, one, six, and eight patients in the isthmus; bony portion and isthmus; bony portion, isthmus, and cartilaginous portion; and isthmus and cartilaginous portion subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Valsalva CT is particularly valuable as a visualization assessment tool for identifying obstructed areas in the OETD. It may help future research of disease-specific mechanical characteristics of the ET on controlling pressure variables.