Health care utilization and excess costs after pelvic fractures among older people in Germany.

Our study demonstrates a strong increase in utilization of inpatient health care and clear excess costs in older people in the first year after pelvic fracture, the latter even after adjustment for several confounders. Excess costs were particularly high in the first few months and mainly attributable to inpatient treatment. INTRODUCTION: We aimed to estimate health care utilization and excess costs in patients aged minimum 60 years up to 1 year after pelvic fracture compared to a population without pelvic fracture. METHODS: In this retrospective population-based observational study, we used routine data from a large statutory health insurance (SHI) in Germany. Patients with a first pelvic fracture between 2008 and 2010 (n=5685, 82% female, mean age 80±9 years) were frequency matched with controls (n=193,159) by sex, age at index date, and index month. We estimated health care utilization and mean total direct costs (SHI perspective) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using BCA bootstrap procedures for 52 weeks before and after the index date. We calculated cost ratios (CRs) in 4-week intervals after the index date by fitting mixed two-part models including adjustment for possible confounders and repeated measurement. All analyses were further stratified for men/women, in-/outpatient-treated, and major/minor pelvic fractures. RESULTS: Health care utilization and mean costs in the year after the index date were higher for cases than for controls, with inpatient treatment being particularly pronounced. CRs (95% CIs) decreased from 10.7 (10.2-11.1) within the first 4 weeks to 1.3 (1.2-1.4) within week 49-52. Excess costs were higher for inpatient than for outpatient-treated persons (CRs of 13.4 (12.9-13.9) and 2.3 (2.0-2.6) in week 1-4). In the first few months, high excess costs were detected for both persons with major and minor pelvic fracture. CONCLUSION: Pelvic fractures come along with high excess costs and should be considered when planning and allocating health care resources.

[Distances to hospitals performing minimum volume relevant procedures in Germany 2004 to 2006]. / Distanzen zu Krankenhäusern mit Mindestmengen-relevanten Eingriffen 2004 bis 2006.

INTRODUCTION: In 2004, Germany introduced annual minimum volumes nationwide on five surgical procedures (kidney, liver, stem cell transplantation, complex oesophageal, and pancreatic interventions). In 2006, minimum volumes for total knee prosthesis were added and the five established minimum volumes were almost doubled. Since minimum volumes usually result in the regionalisation of procedures, especially patients from rural areas are impeded by geographical access problems. The aim of our study was to analyse regional and time-related differences in the distances patients travelled to hospitals performing minimum volume relevant procedures between 2004 and 2006 in Germany. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK). Using a geographical information system we analysed the distances that patients who underwent one of the six minimum volume procedures travelled to the hospital in the years 2004-2006. We performed t-tests to analyse differences between the 16 German Federal States and the years of observation while correcting for multiple testing. RESULTS: On average patients travelled between 28.6/28.0 km (2004/2006) for knee prosthesis and 78.9 km for stem cell transplantation (2004) and 97.4 km for liver transplantation (2006). In 2004, distances travelled differed up to a factor of 9.9 [comparing distances travelled to stem cell transplantation of patients of the states of Berlin (30.6 km) and Hamburg (303 km)]. In 2006, the maximum difference (factor 12.2) was observed for oesophageal interventions comparing distances travelled in the states of Bremen (7.2 km) and Saarland (88.8 km). For almost all comparisons there were significant differences of the minimum and maximum distances travelled in one of the Federal States compared to the federal average. Comparing distances travelled in 2004 and 2006 we found only small and inconsistent variations. DISCUSSION: We found that geographical access to inpatient care for minimum volume procedures in Germany differs sizably between the Federal States in 2004 and 2006. In spite of doubling the minimum volumes in 2006, the distances patients travelled to hospitals hardly change. This may be caused by an inert implementation of the minimum volume regulation leading to an unchanged number of hospitals providing the respective procedures.

[Hospitals failing minimum volumes in 2004: reasons and consequences]. / Unterschreitungen der Mindestmengen 2004: Begründungen und Konsequenzen.

BACKGROUND: In 2004 Germany introduced annual minimum volumes nationwide on five surgical procedures: kidney, liver, stem cell transplantation, complex oesophageal, and pancreatic interventions. Hospitals that fail to reach the minimum volumes are no longer allowed to perform the respective procedures unless they raise one of eight legally accepted exceptions. The goal of our study was to investigate how many hospitals fell short of the minimum volumes in 2004, whether and how this was justified, and whether hospitals that failed the requirements experienced any consequences. METHOD: We analysed data on meeting the minimum volume requirements in 2004 that all German hospitals were obliged to publish as part of their biannual structured quality reports. We performed telephone interviews: a) with all hospitals not achieving the minimum volumes for complex oesophageal, and pancreatic interventions, and b) with the national umbrella organisations of all German sickness funds. RESULTS: In 2004, one quarter of all German acute care hospitals (N=485) performed 23,128 procedures where minimum volumes applied. 197 hospitals (41%) did not meet at least one of the minimum volumes. These hospitals performed N=715 procedures (3.1%) where the minimum volumes were not met. In 43% of these cases the hospitals raised legally accepted exceptions. In 33% of the cases the hospitals argued using reasons that were not legally acknowledged. 69% of those hospitals that failed to achieve the minimum volumes for complex oesophageal and pancreatic interventions did not experience any consequences from the sickness funds. However, one third of those hospitals reported that the sickness funds addressed the issue and partially announced consequences for the future. The sickness funds' umbrella organisations stated that there were only sparse activities related to the minimum volumes and that neither uniform registrations nor uniform proceedings in case of infringements of the standards had been agreed upon. DISCUSSION: In spite of the high number of hospitals that failed to achieve the minimum volumes in 2004, only few hospitals experienced consequences from the sickness funds. The reluctance of the payers may be explained, amongst others, by the small number of patients affected and the percentage of cases where legally accepted exceptions applied. In view of the partly unclear definitions of the exceptions and difficulties in the interpretation and execution of the minimum volumes in the hospitals and at the sickness fund level, it may be helpful to formulate more concrete instructions for the implementation of the standards.

[Influence of minimum volumes on the structure of inpatient care]. / Auswirkung der Mindestmengenvereinbarung auf die stationäre Versorgungsstruktur.

OBJECTIVE: In 2004 five minimum volumes were introduced for the first time into German hospitals. The structural effects of these minimum volumes are presented as the first part of a health service research to evaluate the minimum volume regulation. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/METHODS: The investigation is based on the mandatory hospital quality reports for 2004. Data were extracted from 1710 quality reports, descriptively analysed and applied to the modified minimum volumes for 2006. RESULTS: In 2004, 485 out of 1710 German hospitals providing acute care and approximately 23,128 cases, i.e., 0.14% of all hospital cases, were affected by at least one minimum volume regulation. The number of affected hospitals varies considerably between the German Federal Sates with 16% in Bavaria and 75% in Bremen. In 2004 (and presumably 2006) the following hospital numbers will comply with the minimum volume regulation: liver transplantation 100% (63%), kidney transplantation 91% (84%), stem cell transplantation 84% (65%), complex oesophageal interventions 71% (40%), complex pancreatic interventions 82% (51%). On a case level, 4% of kidney transplantation cases and up to 22% of complex oesophageal interventions were to be redistributed. Viewing the hospital size by number of beds, smaller (100-300 beds) and medium size hospitals (300-600 beds) are affected in complex oesophageal and pancreatic interventions, whereas in transplantations medium and large hospitals (>600 beds) are affected. Considering the regional distribution on a district level, the number of districts with at least one hospital providing the respective service will decrease from 2004 to 2006, with the strongest reduction in complex oesophageal interventions from 172 to 82 districts (-53%). CONCLUSION: In 2004 the minimum volume regulation has moderate structural effects on the care setting. In 2006 these effects will be stronger due to the doubled number of interventions required for most of the minimum volumes. The effects on transplantations have to be differentiated from those on oesophageal and pancreatic interventions since the former are already highly centralised whereas the latter are mainly provided on a medium hospital care level and will be shifted on to the maximum hospital care level. This process should stimulate a debate on geographically equal access to care within and among the Federal Sates.

Systematic reviews of clinical decision tools for acute abdominal pain.

OBJECTIVES: To review for acute abdominal pain (AAP), the diagnostic accuracies of combining decision tools (DTs) and doctors aided by DTs compared with those of unaided doctors. Also to evaluate the impact of providing doctors with an AAP DT on patient outcomes, clinical decisions and actions, what factors are likely to determine the usage rates and usability of a DT and the associated costs and likely cost-effectiveness of these DTs in routine use in the UK. DESIGN: Electronic databases were searched up to 1 July 2003. REVIEW METHODS: Data from each eligible study were extracted. Potential sources of heterogeneity were extracted for both questions. For the accuracy review, meta-analysis was conducted. Among studies comparing diagnostic accuracies of DTs with unaided doctors, error rate ratios provided estimates of the differences between the false-negative and false-positive rates of the DT and unaided doctors' performance. Pooled error rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for false-negative rates and false-positive rates were computed. Metaregression was used to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies from 27 articles, all based in secondary care, were eligible for the review of DT accuracies, while two were eligible for the review of the accuracy of hospital doctors aided by DTs. Sensitivities and specificities for DTs ranged from 53 to 99% and from 30 to 99%, respectively. Those for unaided doctors ranged from 64 to 93% and from 39 to 91%, respectively. Thirteen studies reported false-positive and false-negative rates for both DTs and unaided doctors, enabling a direct comparison of their performance. In random effects meta-analyses, DTs had significantly lower false-positive rates (error rate ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.83) than unaided doctors. DTs may have higher false-negative rates than unaided doctors (error rate ratio 1.34, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.93). Significant heterogeneity was present. Two studies compared the diagnostic accuracies of doctors aided by DTs to unaided doctors. In a multiarm cluster randomised controlled trial (n = 5193), the diagnostic accuracy of doctors not given access to DTs was not significantly worse (sensitivity 28.4% and specificity 96.0%) than that of three groups of aided doctors (sensitivities of 42.4-47.9%, and specificities of 95.5-96.5%, respectively). In an uncontrolled before-and-after study (n = 1484), the sensitivities and specificities of aided and unaided doctors were 95.5% and 91.5% (p = 0.24) and 78.1% and 86.4% (p < 0.001), respectively. The metaregression of DTs showed that prospective test-set validation at the site of the tool's development was associated with considerably higher diagnostic accuracy than prospective test-set validation at an independent centre [relative diagnostic odds ratio (RDOR) 8.2; 95% CI 3.1 to 14.7]. It also showed that the earlier in the year the study was performed the higher the performance (RDOR 0.88, 0.83 to 0.92), that when developers evaluated their own DT there was better performance than when independent evaluators carried out the study (RDOR = 3.0, 1.3 to 6.8), and that there was no evidence of association between other quality indicators and DT accuracy. The one eligible study of the impact study review, a four-arm cluster randomised trial (n = 5193), showed that hospital admission rates of patients by doctors not allocated to a DT (42.8%) were significantly higher than those by doctors allocated to three combinations of decision support (34.2-38.5%) (p < 0.001). There was no evidence of a difference between perforation rates (p = 0.19) and negative laparotomy rates in the four trial arms (p = 0.46). Usage rates of DTs by doctors in accident and emergency departments ranged from 10 to 77% in the six studies that reported them. Possible determinants of usability include the reasoning method used, the number of items used and the output format. A deterministic cost-effectiveness comparison demonstrated that a paper checklist is likely to be 100-900 times more cost-effective than a computer-based DT, under stated assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: With their significantly greater specificity and lower false-positive rates than doctors, DTs are potentially useful in confirming a diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but not in ruling it out. The clinical use of well-designed, condition-specific paper or computer-based structured checklists is promising as a way to improve impact on patient outcomes, subject to further research.

[On the prognosis of hip fractures. Assessment of mortality after hip fractures by analyzing overlapping segments of longitudinal data]. / Zur Prognose der Schenkelhalsfraktur. Beurteilung der Mortalität nach Schenkelhalsfraktur durch sektorübergreifende Datenzusammenführung.

BACKGROUND: Data on the treatment of hip fractures in acute care settings have been collected in a report card system for quality assurance in Germany since the beginning of the 1990s. However, there are no data on the long-term outcome and long-term quality of care. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In a retrospective study, data on 1393 patients from 1999 were collected from different sources: from the department of quality assurance at the medical association of Westfalia-Lippe, the Statutory Health Insurance Funds (AOK), and the Medical Review Board of the Statutory Health Insurance Funds (Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenkasse, MDK). Statistical analyses were performed by the Center for Clinical Studies of the University of Düsseldorf. RESULTS: Uni- and multivariate analyses reveal the following prognostic parameters for survival after hip fracture: sex, age, nursing care dependency, living in a nursing home, risk stratification according to ASA, and postoperative complications. Timing of the operation had no affect on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors for the outcome after hip fracture can only be obtained by analyzing data from the hospital stay and the post-hospital setting as well. Chances of survival can be significantly improved by rehabilitative care.

Attitude towards clinical trials: results of a survey of persons interested in research.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Patient recruitment is a major problem in clinical trials. In a survey, the attitude of a public sample towards clinical trials was assessed. SUBJECTS: In a survey 225 visitors to the Heinrich-Heine University were interviewed with respect to their attitude towards clinical trials. METHODS: Visitors were interviewed with regard to sociodemographic variables, disease status, knowledge about and experience of trials and attitude towards clinical trials. Three scenarios for clinical trials were presented (dental trial, surgical trial, pharmaceutical trial). RESULTS: In general, a positive attitude was found. Clinical trials were judged important by 89.5% of the survey participants; however, only 25% would take part in clinical trials. The likelihood of potential participation was lower in the surgical trial than in the dental or pharmaceutical trial scenarios. The willingness to participate was significantly higher in persons, who considered trials to be important, with general knowledge about clinical trials and with previous trial participation. CONCLUSIONS: The willingness to participate in a clinical trial is still low in the public. More information and involvement in clinical trials may improve the general attitude.

[Economic restraints shorten the length of hospital stay: thyroid operation as a model case]. / Okonomische Zwänge führen zur Reduktion der stationären VerweildauerBeispiel: Schilddrüsenoperation.

INTRODUCTION: Decreasing the length of stay is a possible means of cost control in the medical system. Therefore we performed a study to test the feasibility of reducing hospital stay to 2 days after thyroid operation. METHODS: In a controlled prospective trial, 238 patients were randomly assigned to group A (2 days of stay) or group B (more than 2 days). Studied were medical standard, practicability, patient acceptance, and quality of life. RESULTS: Of those in group A, 56.6% did not leave the hospital at the scheduled 2nd day post operation. Reasons were preoperative hyperthyroidism ( P<0.011), postoperative hypocalcemia ( P<0.03), or unspecific disturbances. In group B, 28% of the patients left before the established borderline of 3-4 days, and only 35% left on the 2nd postoperative day. CONCLUSION: Reduced length of stay has no negative influence on medical standards. The quality of life of patients leaving the hospital on the 2nd postoperative day was significantly higher. Reducing hospital stay after thyroid operation to 2 postoperative days is desirable and possible without a loss in quality of care, except in case of postoperative complications or unspecific complaints.

Comparison of three databases with a decision tree approach in the medical field of acute appendicitis.

Decision trees have been successfully used for years in many medical decision making applications. Transparent representation of acquired knowledge and fast algorithms made decision trees one of the most often used symbolic machine learning approaches. This paper concentrates on the problem of separating acute appendicitis, which is a special problem of acute abdominal pain from other diseases that cause acute abdominal pain by use of an decision tree approach. Early and accurate diagnosing of acute appendicitis is still a difficult and challenging problem in everyday clinical routine. An important factor in the error rate is poor discrimination between acute appendicitis and other diseases that cause acute abdominal pain. This error rate is still high, despite considerable improvements in history-taking and clinical examination, computer-aided decision-support and special investigation, such as ultrasound. We investigated three different large databases with cases of acute abdominal pain to complete this task as successful as possible. The results show that the size of the database does not necessary directly influence the success of the decision tree built on it. Surprisingly we got the best results from the decision trees built on the smallest and the biggest database, where the database with medium size (relative to the other two) was not so successful. Despite that we were able to produce decision tree classifiers that were capable of producing correct decisions on test data sets with accuracy up to 84%, sensitivity to acute appendicitis up to 90%, and specificity up to 80% on the same test set.

[Incidence of operations in Germany via telephone survey in 4 selected cities]. / Untersuchung zu Operationshäufigkeiten in Deutschland durch Telefonbefragung in vier ausgewählten Städten.

Considerable regional variation of surgical procedure rates has been reported for a number of countries. Influential variables that have been discussed are patient-related, physician-related and health care system-specific factors. A representative computer-assisted telephone survey was conducted in four selected regions for a study sponsored by the German Federal Ministry of Health. These regions were the townships of Aachen and Hamm in North Rhine-Westphalia and Chemnitz and Görlitz in Saxony. During the telephone survey 1897 persons were contacted and 1041 interviews completed. Multiple logistic regression showed a surgical procedure frequency which was by 40% higher in Aachen than in Hamm. During further analysis the regional localisation was replaced by region-specific structural health care information variables. During this analysis the regional frequency of medical specialists was significant at a 5% level (odds ratio: 1.07; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.12). This result can be interpreted as an increase in surgical procedures by 7% for each additional specialist per 10,000 persons. However, no definite conclusion can be reached based on the available data. Intensifying the presented survey-based health services research has the potential to identify regional over- or undersupply of medical services, to objectify and accompany informational, administrative or political action and thereby to support equity in access and health care in the sense of an optimized allocation of resources.

Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable.

BACKGROUND: Healthy-looking appendixes are often removed at laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. This practice may have adverse secondary effects. METHODS: We reviewed the literature for the years 1978 to 1998 to analyze the negative appendectomy rates, complication rates, the accuracy of laparoscopic appendix assessment, and the incidence of false negative diagnosis of appendicitis at surgical and gynecological laparoscopy. RESULTS: The respective negative appendectomy rates were 22% and 15% in studies that compared laparoscopic with open appendectomy. The appendix was left in situ in 37% of 4,281 surgical diagnostic laparoscopies. There were instances of missed appendicitis among the 3,367 gynecological diagnostic laparoscopies performed on women for lower abdominal pain, and there were 188 appendectomies in this group. Studies comparing the macroscopic appearance of the appendix at operation with microscopic findings from the excised specimen had a false negative error rate of 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to general opinion, there is no substantial evidence to support the assumption that the macroscopic diagnosis of appendicitis is unreliable. High rates of conflicting diagnoses of excision specimens suggest that endoappendicitis has little clinical significance. At present, negative appendectomy rates are considerably higher for laparoscopic appendectomy than for the open approach. The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in suspected appendicitis should be reconsidered. It may be useful in particular subgroups of patients, but it is no substitute for good clinical judgment. Furthermore, it is not always necessary to perform an incidental appendectomy.

[Roentgen imaging in acute abdominal pain is dispensable]. / Röntgennativaufnahmen bei akuten Bauchschmerzen sind vermeidbar.

Plain abdominal X-ray films are overused in patients with acute abdominal pain. Focusing on medical history and physical examination helps to reduce the number of plain films used and saves costs.

A systematic approach to the assessment of user satisfaction with health care systems: constructs, models and instruments.

In this paper an overview is given about research in the field of user satisfaction with health care systems and a new systematic model is set up. The model distinguishes between system-independent and system-dependent factors, the latter characterised by satisfaction with the content, the interface and the organisation. Evaluated instruments for assessing user satisfaction are classified according to the model and recommendation for an appropriate use are given.

[Quality assurance from the theoretical viewpoint]. / Qualitätssicherung aus theoretischer Sicht.

The process of quality assurance is related to all measures and actions used to achieve the required quality. There is agreement about the aim and benefit of quality assurance, but the appropriate way is a matter of discussion. This paper deals from a theoretical viewpoint with basic problems of quality assurance that have not been evaluated adequately so far: a) criteria for measuring quality, b) measuring quality with adjustment for case-mix and c) evaluation of the effects of quality assurance. During the last years tools and study designs have been developed, which could contribute to the solution of these problems by a more sensible analysis, more complete and quality-controlled data and more useful evaluation studies. Further improvements in external quality assurance in surgery are to be expected, if these aspects are taken into consideration.

[Biomedical and clinimetric approaches in determining the causes of perioperative risk: developing a German ASA classification]. / Biomedizinische und klinimetrische Ansätze in der Ursachenforschung beim perioperativen Risiko: Erstellung einer deutschen ASA-Klassifikation.

Perioperative risk research with biomedical (biochemical, physiological) methods must grow up as a main topic in surgical research. However, operative risk has also to be analysed with methods of clinimetrics, such as formal (objective) decision making and epidemiology. Only by this way a convincing practical dimension is added to basic scientific statements. ASA-classification of the preoperative physical status is a global index for estimating the operative risk. It contains objective findings, subjective impressions and the final clinical judgement. For this reason it is so flexible. For a multicentre trial on perioperative risk and histamine an empirical index was constructed using both the ASA-classification and the Mannheim-Munich risk check list.