Experimental study and techno-economic analysis of co-processing system for treatment of food waste with various impurities.

The study assessed a co-processing system segregating food waste (FW) with different impurities into liquid (slurry) and solid fractions and treated using anaerobic digestion (AD) and pyrolysis (Py), respectively, which is defined as ADCo-Py. Biomethane potential tests showed higher methane yield from the FW slurry fraction (572.88 mL/gVSFW) compared to the whole FW (294.37 mL/gVSFW). Pyrolyzing the FW solid fraction reduced nitrogen compounds in bio-oil by 62 % compared to the whole FW. The energy balance and economic feasibility of ADCo-Py were compared with stand-alone AD, Py, and AD integrated with incineration (ADCo-INC). While all systems required extra energy, stand-alone Py and ADCo-INC needed 3.8 and 2.8 times more energy than ADCo-Py, respectively. Techno-economic analysis favored ADCo-Py, with a net present value (NPV) of $15 million and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 34 %. These findings highlighted FW separation as a promising approach, aligning with energy and economic goals in sustainable FW management.

Life cycle assessment of the integration of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for treatment of municipal solid waste.

The integration of anaerobic digestion (AD) and pyrolysis (Py) could be a solution to economically utilize the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). However, it is not clear whether the environmental impact of the integrated pathway always outperforms the two single technologies. In this study, two integrated pathways (AD-Py, Py-AD) were compared with single AD and Py from the life cycle environmental impacts point of view. The results indicate that the environmental impacts of the four pathways are heavily dependent on their energy inputs and outputs. AD-Py is more environmentally friendly (-11.53 of total environmental impact /kg OFMSW) than single AD or Py. Py-AD exhibites the heaviest environmental burden (2.75 of total environmental impact /kg OFMSW) in all pathways. Therefore, AD-Py can be the top priority of treating OFMSW among the four pathways from the environmental viewpoint. This work could provide a theoretical support for the utilization of OFMSW.